Inevitable stupidityPosted By James Lacey |
Jim Brown said:
It bugs me that many lefty commentators are pointing to Hillary's popular vote victory as some sort of salve. Do these fools really think that the popular vote would be exactly as it was on Tuesday if the campaigns had been focused on winning the popular vote?
Think about it, if the popular vote mattered, the campaigns would have focused on all 50 states, but really focused on CA, NY, TX FL and other states where big popular vote totals might be run up. The complexion of the game would change entirely! Would Trump still have won if the campaigns had been focused on the popular vote? Maybe, maybe not - we don't know because that is not the game that was played.
Popular vote whiners would be like a football fan who thinks it matters that his team got 450 yards to the opponents 325 yards, even though his team was outscored 35-10. Then this loser says, well, the other teams victory is diminished because we got more yards than them! How foolish would that be since the goal and two teams' game plans were designed to score, not to run up yardage!
Hillary and Donald competed to win the EC. Everyone knows that the EC is all that matters legally. How come certain pundits don't also recognize that the popular vote is doubly irrelevant because the parties did not campaign to run up the popular vote?
Jim
Just more nonsense you hear every election cycle. Without the electoral college, candidates would only campaign in densely populated urban areas which would clearly favor the Democratic party of today.
