Image of the day

Captured by
Craig Bobchin

Coathanger CR 399

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Matt Luttinen

March 29, 2004 08:50 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

DSC's, GOTO, or Star Hop??

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Randy and everybody,

As a recent convert to DSCs (Argo Navis), I can testify that this technology has revolutionized the observing experience for me. My observing lists are 2-3 times longer per session these days, and I am actually spending more time on each object than in my star-hopping days.

I live in urban Phoenix, Arizona, so there is no opportunity to observe DSOs from home. I estimate that I get out to dark skies 12-15 times per year depending on the weather. This is a depressingly low number. So, I find my dark-sky time to be a precious commodity, and the efficiency I have gained by using the AN has shown me that I have been wasting at least 50% of this time star-hopping to objects.

As for those people who think GOTO scopes allow users to get away with "not knowing the sky," I say "balderdash!" Perhaps this is true of GOTO scope *owners*; that is, people who buy scopes and rarely use them, but I have found that every earnest observer must "learn the sky" in order to place his/her observing in context. For example, GOTO and DSC owners must know the names and reletive locations of many bright stars in order to get aligned. OK, Celestron GPS Nexstars are fully automatic, but the Nexstar 11 owners I know have become experts at the hardware (and still need to know at least the bright stars, which means you have to know many constellations, etc) because GOTO systems are far from perfect, and they don't always point correctly. The user often has to step in to make things right.

Oh, and GOTO scopes track objects. As has already been said, the higher the power, the more tracking matters.

My Argo Navis has directed me to objects I would not likely have ever "found." A good example is the Struve double catalog--in the city, star hopping to these objects would be extremely difficult. With the AN, it is almost too easy.

As always, YMMV, but I and my fellow SAC observers have discovered that serious observing can get more serious when modern technology is brought to bear.

Matt
Saguaro Astronomy club
Glendale, AZ

May 9, 2004 07:59 PM Forum: Pictures of Me and My Telescope and........

Scopes please Scopes

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Hello everybody,

Presented for your consideration, my 14-1/4" f7 Newt, with an excellent circa 1979 full-thickness Coulter mirror:

Matt

May 27, 2004 06:53 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

$$$ AP$$$ OTA ?? Only??

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Hello everybody,

Well, a 7" AP is certainly collectable, and the perceived value "is what it is" to the collector. Heck, I paid $200 for a 60s-vintage Edmund 4-1/4" f10.5 Newt simply because it was an exact example of my first scope. BUT, for $37K you could buy two TMB 175s ($13K each) and have Joe Castoro or some worthy atmer create an awesome pair of binos with them. 7" APO binos, now we're talkin! Matching AP 155 EDFs for binocular use would also be nice ($8.8K each), and you would have enough "left over" to get a 28" Starmaster!

$37K goes a long way with astro gear, if you let it.

Click on the image link to see what $200 can get you.

Matt

June 10, 2004 08:52 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Digital Setting Circles

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Hello everybody,

I would not call the Argo Navis "huge." It is 7.5" x 4" x 1.75" and very light-weight. It fits easily in my hand and is a pleasure to use. As has been said, it is a step up from the SC in both features and technology. The only feature needed is "PUSH TO" RA/DEC, which will be added with the next firmware release. In this it is like Meade's Autostar, which I'm sure everyone knows is Internet-upgradeable via firmware downloads.

Sure, the AN costs more, but it's worth it IMHO.

Matt


July 22, 2004 02:17 PM Forum: Telescope Making

BORED (Pictures Please)

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Ian and everybody,

This will be a repost (I think), but sometimes you got to say, "what the heck!"

The scope is my soon-to-be-remade-into-a-Dob 14.25" f7 Newtonian. The primary is vintage 1979 Coulter, and it is most excellent.

Matt
Glendale, AZ


August 30, 2004 05:17 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Things you'd like to see....

Posted By Matt Luttinen

How about a TV Nagler 4-8 Zoom?

Matt

November 14, 2004 10:09 PM Forum: Telescope Making

A big box on the porch

Posted By Matt Luttinen

At 20:1 thickness ratio, the mirror support system becomes all-important. If this big hunk-o-glass were mine, I would spare no expense to create an ultra-precise and flexible yet extremely rigid (that is, the support frame) whiffletree backstop.

Plop suggests a 36pt design. 27 pts brings the allowed flexure pretty close (actually a little over) the recommended 1/16 wavefront P-V limit . . .

See this page:

http://www.davidlewistoronto.com/plop/#Graphic%20Output

Dave Lewis is the man when it comes to this stuff!

Matt




February 5, 2005 06:34 PM Forum: Pictures of Me and My Telescope and........

Scopes Please 2

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Hello everybody,

Presented for your consideration, a standard-issue Hardin DSH 12 OTA on one of my custom mount-strosities.

After the time and effort invested in the fabrication of this mount, I have decided that I will never make an un-driven mount again. The benefits definitely outweigh the additional layer of complexity.

Cheers,

Matt

February 18, 2005 05:13 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Zambuto 10" f/6 mirror update.

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Floyd,

I have a freshly baked 12.5" f5.6 by Carl at Spectrum. I am going to build the OTA and mount myself but can't decide which way to go, tube or truss.

All I can say is that it's a great problem to have! I am counting the days until it arrives . . .

Good luck with your 10"!

Matt

February 25, 2005 12:51 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

OK, now for the secondary for the new ZZ-10

Posted By Matt Luttinen

Floyd,

You might want to take a look at Protostar quartz. Sometimes they even offer a "select" best-of-batch for a few more $.

My 12.5" CZ primary will have one of these (2.14") along with their curved spider. I am buying into the fact that quartz polishes out to a smoother micro-finish than Pyrex.

But I'm sure you really can't go wrong either way--I imagine Antares knows their business too.

Flat AND smooth--now that is a nice combination. Go for the best!

Matt