Posts Made By: Greg Shaffer

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

 Wanna watch me play dump truck ya hillbilly hick?

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi Rod:

Mel's position makes sense to me.  He would never vote for Trump and never did vote for Trump.  Even so, he is not convinced that the union was nearly lost on Jan 6, or that Trump was the mastermind behind the insurrection.  So he posts here.  Mel's position is not unlike my own.  I think we will both wait and see if Trump is referred for prosecution.  I hope he is, but I don't think the likes of Adam Schiff can get it done.  Jim

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Of course it is. This whole thing is reminiscent of a Banana Republic.  The idiots who are hoping for prosecution of Trump are just that, idiots.  

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

Greg, I'm genuinely curious. Are you willing to let the past go in 2024 and forget about Trump as far as the Presidential race goes? I'm willing to do that to support a GOP candidate, but I don't know if others in the GOP base are. If this is just going to be an election about how Trump was screwed, I may vote for the GOP, but with little enthusiasm. If Trump actually runs again (or someone like DJT JR), I'll hold my nose again and vote for and support the Dems.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

These are UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, not rights that bureaucrats decide you get to have.

Thankfully 6 Justices on the SCOTUS still believe in the US Constitution BILL OF RIGHTS.

You have a unalienable RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.

It doesn't say in the Constitution that you may ONLY Protect yourself when you are AT HOME.

That is an Asinine concept. They US Constitution does not say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed...... as long as you're at home watching TV"

And to those who are going to go insane about this ruling, My words to you are "deal with it", you don't get to decide that I need to jump through YOUR hoops to be able to exercise my RIGHT under the Constitution.

Got it?

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I'm not pro abortion at all but in certain cases it is warranted. In 24 hours the supremes gave a gun carrying rapist the right to choose the mother of his future offspring and force a government mandated unwanted pregnancy/child to the victim as a constant reminder of her rapist.

On edit: I guess you could argue the woman who gets raped should have been packing to ward off her attacker herself.