Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Hi Rod,
What does that mean?
I don't what "Q" is, perhaps you can explain.
BTW, it has to be tough to have to ignore the facts about Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Mueller and all the others on your side, isn't it?
Let me repeat, your Californian Senator there, Dianne Feinstein, along with Ron Wyden and all the other Dems were outraged at Brennan for his crimes of spying on them a few years back. Then when he lied about it, they were furious.
Any comments from you regarding their fake outrage now and complete 180 degree turnaround of their hatred for him?
Strikes me that this whole Russian Collusion charade is just that, a charade and something that the Democratic Socialists can use to gin up their base of complete meatheads. Too bad for your side that they are so phony that they have no credibility on the matter.

First the financials:
"Republicans railed against the national debt during the Obama administration, when it nearly doubled from $10.6 trillion to $19.9 trillion. But Republicans — with few exceptions — have been more muted about the debt under Mr. Trump. Earlier this year, Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul temporarily held up a spending bill on the Senate floor, blasting Republicans for approving of the spending levels they criticized under Obama.
"I ran for office because I was critical of President Obama's trillion-dollar deficits," Paul said at the time. "Now we have Republicans hand-in-hand with Democrats offering us trillion-dollar deficits."
The "burgeoning" federal debt in the decades ahead will result in reduced national savings and income in the long run, increase pressure on the rest of the budget due to growing interest costs, limit lawmakers' ability to respond to unplanned events, and increase the chances of a major fiscal crisis, according to the CBO."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-debt-at-highest-level-since-after-wwii/
Second, the "Q" movement explained:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtXniAZL4jE
Those guys make the wingnuts on this forum look good.
Third, I'll let Brennan defend himself:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/16/john-brennan-security-clearance-new-york-times-op-ed-779542