Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Not to mention those 12 years on the bench he was so admired, respected and praised for by his peers.....He and his family have been put through hell, none of that matters though....

So for the last week all we heard from the Democrats was the "American people deserve to know the truth!"

Then as of today they are shouting "Seal the report!"

They are riding the "blue wave" right down the toilet like champions LOL.....

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Of course he is neutral.  His 300+ opinions, 12 of which were upheld by the US Supreme Court are ample evidence of that fact. 

The only LUNACY came from your side of the aisle, and it certainly takes an IMMENSE HUTZPAH on your part to even mention his partisanship, when EVERY SINGLE Democrat on the Judiciary committee, the one that is supposed to consider his scholarship only in making their decision about him, attacked him as not only a sexual offender, but a predator, and a Gang rapist.  

To have the temerity to sit on your high horse of indignation about the man, when they ran him through the mud with ZERO concern for the consequences to his life and his family is the ultimate in gall.

And WHO exactly did this dastardly deed of ripping apart his GOOD name and his Character?? Which person(s) on that committee did so?  It was ALL the Democrats, one after the next who impugned his character and treated him as a common criminal.

So who is partisan exactly??  Him?  Hell, he was simply defending himself from the mob carrying torches and pitchforks.  

No wonder he exhibited a defense against a certain political Demographic.  Who the hell wouldn't?  It was that Group, ALL Democrats that attacked him mercilessly.

Is he supposed to be equally upset with the Republicans, when they were the only ones to treat him with a modicum of decency, dignity, respect, and humanity??

How stupid can one get to say he's partisan when the MOB of Democrats were the ones atttacking him.  

Your characterization of him as partisan is so damned absurd and idiotic that it is enough to make a person's head spin. 

Your asinine description is tantamount to finding a man shipwrecked by himself on a desert Island, who comes upon a group of Island Natives who surround him and beat him with their fists and feet, punching and kicking him until he finally reaches out and throws a punch back, and then you comment that he must have a prejudice against the native people because they were the only ones he punched back at.  

Your assertion is just that stupid.

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

How convenient Rod....a couple Democrats who know full well the report WONT be made public use it for an opportunity to say "look at me calling for transparency" and you didnt hear the whoosh as it went right over your head

Originally Posted by James Lacey

The thing about this op-ed is, there doesn't seem to be any reason to do it except of course you are concerned about the optics of BK's angry entitled privileged white-male antics. Are the Republicans really struggling to get 50? Imagine if they still needed 60. Just keep in mind though Rod, it's really your fault that BK had to get so angry. If you only had flopped over when he said, "I LIKE ME BEER!"

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

James,
It's not my fault. It's the fault of the Clintons for unleashing the left wing conspiracy against Brett as "revenge" for their loss in 2016. That's obvious and Brett informed everyone of this fact so we would all be on the same page. Not that it really matters since Bret already said it ruined his life, Maybe he'll feel better when he gets elevated to the court and celebrates by going out and having a big gulp beer or two or more but don't worry, he knows when to stop. I also don't think he has too much to worry about since the FBI report about him is confidential and even he can tell you releasing it is illegal. 
Maybe he apologized because he just felt guilty. I suppose those 300 plus pious priests and cardinals that reportedly did what they did after denying what they did "might" have felt guilty about it even though it might have happened decades ago...

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

James,
And one more thing, just consider this: since he blamed the Clintons and their lust for "revenge" against him, he must have the evidence to support his accusation. I'm sure he's keeping safe. But before he even did that, you need to consider the intellect involved in piecing it all together and putting it down on the printed page before reading it to the nation. Not to mention appearing on fair and balanced "Fox News" as his choice for independent thought and objectivity. He's obviously a neutral and disinterested third party when it comes to presenting himself to the public. When you consider all of this in its totality, it's an injustice to have him as an associate justice. He should be the chief justice!

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

James,
It's my fault for dwelling on this but perhaps you can help me with one more thing. Since the revelation that the Clinton's "revenge" is really one for the books, do you have any ideas on how to obtain an autographed copy of the associate justice's hand-penned speech to the nation? Can we petition the court? If you have any ideas, PM me. Additionally, if the good judge attends Sunday services in your locale where he'll be giving a speech on the separation of church and state, send me an autographed copy of that. too. Perhaps it can be posted as the AM picture of the day. And those 300 pious priests, bishops and cardinal in attendance on their road to redemption might just be there as well so send a snapshot of them, too. OTH, their accusers probably lied about it just like Ford, so leave them out of it...