Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I agree with him sometimes, not all. All I know is what you comment on, usually agreeing with the far right and fox news. I swear, sometimes I can' decipher what you are trying to say.

BTW- were you upset about Hillary's deleted or missing emails? I seem to recollect you were and still are. Is it okay when your guy does it? I've asked that a couple of times, I could demand an answer like our resident "Richard", but I won't.

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Rich stated that the sun rising was a fact..... Lacey argued that it isnt a fact but a social construct. In other words Lacey wanted to turn the sun coming up into a semantic argument to avoid the fact that it just is a fact, same as a man cant give birth to a baby lol

(although it does occur to me that my time here in this group does at times confirm there is such a thing as an asshole baby so maybe there is wiggle room on whether men can have one) lol

I gave my opinion on the abortion issue a few days ago and you agreed with it......not interested in beating a dead horse

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

This latest crap from the left about men can have babies is ridiculous and I get Rich wanting to point that fallacy out and get an admission from those on the left that it is ridiculous. Yet the left on here avoids it at all costs, even using semantics to argue about the sun rising  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Here's the question.  Its very difficult to answer.  

And apparently, asking for an answer to one of the most simple questions and obvious answers, is now  beating a dead horse?

Greg has figured out my motive and he explained it perfectly above.

I'm simply exposing the left for their bizarre thoughts, showing how their leadership and their candidates for positions in gov't are a scary thing to think about when they want to shove their psychotic views down the throats of all Americans.

Why is it that Greg was able to get my gist and you're still puzzled?  

My guess is that Greg is just a sharper cookie and has something that you seem to be lacking, common sense!  

And BTW, I checked with Merriam-Webster and the Oxford English Dictionaries as well.  

The word "Semantics" and the phrase "Social Construct" don't seem to be interchangeable at all.

In fact "Semantics" is an adjective, while "social construct" is a noun.

Contextually they are totally different as well.  Just an FYI for your education counselor.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Desperate?  Really I'm desperate?  LOL

I asked a question.  You and the rest are the ones hyperventilating over it.

Here's the question:

Can a man have a baby?  Wow, I must be SO desperate.   Emote and exaggerate much Jim?  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

And NO ONE claims they have said that.....just that they support those who are saying it and rather than admit the ones claiming it are full of shit they will argue all around it without addressing it. What part of that escapes you counselor? I explained why Rich keeps repeating the question and yet you still refuse to recognize it.... You seem reasonably conservative but you sure spend a lot of time here toting water for the other side

I am fine with whatever delusions people want to hide themselves in however this push to allow men to participate in women's sports is a few steps over the line into stupid so stupid its trans-stupid, meta-stupid.

I dont "think" Rich is making a point....I know he is and he did it quite well with this latest round.

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

And NO ONE claims they have said that.....just that they support those who are saying it and rather than admit the ones claiming it are full of shit they will argue all around it without addressing it. What part of that escapes you counselor? I explained why Rich keeps repeating the question and yet you still refuse to recognize it.... You seem reasonably conservative but you sure spend a lot of time here toting water for the other side

I am fine with whatever delusions people want to hide themselves in however this push to allow men to participate in women's sports is a few steps over the line into stupid so stupid its trans-stupid, meta-stupid.

I dont "think" Rich is making a point....I know he is and he did it quite well with this latest round.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Here's a suggestion for you Jim, get over it.  

I don't sit here and shoot names at people at any rate even close to what you claim I do.  You say I "Nearly always" do that?  Hmm... that's another bit of complete exaggeration on your part as far as I can tell.  

In fact the only person I do that with it is really Rod K.  

That's because he refers to me as an asshole and a Trumptoid regularly.

But hey don't let the truth get in the way of your narrative where you claim I "Nearly always" name call.    .  

Just yesterday or today (can't remember for sure) Jim M. Called me a Dick,   once again.

And he didn't address me as "Dick" his remarks were personal and he even created a picture with a guitar pick.  

What was my response in return?  Gee, nothing.  I don't even think I mocked him back.  LOL!.

So then, I guess that was the ONE single time out of the last 20 responses I gave here where I didn't call someone a name in return, because we all know that the other 19 times, I called the person I was responding to, a vulgar name, correct?  

Oh wait.... You mean to say I did NOT do that as you claimed??  Gee, isn't that shocking.  

However, if you want to continue being stuck on that broken record, just like the rest of the left here, whining and complaining about my persona, it doesn't really bother me, but I will take the opportunity to set the record straight. 

P.S.  I just revisited this very thread, and Jim M. posted on Page 9, response #86, and you tell me why he felt the need to call me a dick?

He even posted my response to James, which had no name calling or obnoxious remarks about James personally and yet one of his lines was to say "Insert any derogatory name you want to call Rich here". 

You know something Counselor, that is just another of the dozens of examples whereby you've shown completely biased selective outrage, so I think that makes my point for me.  Don't you?  

And my guess is that you'll completely ignore his posting #86, because...... well in your mind Jim M's response about me, and his nasty remark to me,  was a completely appropriate one, and within reason, right ?   

And you wonder why I call you a fraud and a tool for the left??    Believe me, when I tell you that love you more than you could ever know, because as Greg pointed out earlier you tote their water for them.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

What trigger?  I simply put up the facts, and you can't seem to deal with it.

Like I said, I'm happy to defend myself against all the false accusations that you make on a regular basis.  

Would you care to respond to my factual statement about Jim M. and posting #86,  or do you simply want to give your regular little fraudulent remark above?

Here's a challenge for you counselor, put your money where you false assertions are.  

Care to make a wager here and now that Jim M. has called me more names in his last 40 posts than I have him in the last 40 posts I've made?  

How 'bout we make it interesting?  Let's bet $1000.  How does that sound?  

Or are you too much of an intellectual coward and fraud to put your money where your mouth is? 

You let me know here in the next few minutes, Ok Jim.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

What trigger?  I simply put up the facts, and you can't seem to deal with it.

Like I said, I'm happy to defend myself against all the false accusations that you make on a regular basis.  

Would you care to respond to my factual statement about Jim M. and posting #86,  or do you simply want to give your regular little fraudulent remark above?

Here's a challenge for you counselor, put your money where you false assertions are.  

Care to make a wager here and now that Jim M. has called me more names in his last 40 posts than I have him in the last 40 posts I've made?  

How 'bout we make it interesting?  Let's bet $1000.  How does that sound?  

Or are you too much of an intellectual coward and fraud to put your money where your mouth is? 

You let me know here in the next few minutes, Ok Jim.