According To The People Who Make The Call, We're Not In A RecessionPosted By James Brown |
p.s.s.s. I'm not gonna count the names you called Jim over any number of posts by the way, even though I think that objectively you would lose the bet. When I posted the results the only thing certain is that you would deny, redefine, twist, and deflect to avoid admitting all the names you have used. This is my opinion of course, but it is as likely to be true as the sun rising in the East this morning.Originally Posted by James Brown
p.s.s. You should write more carefully. Do you mean last your last 40 posts, period, or last 40 posts in response to each other? If it is the latter, I would not take the bet. Jim calls you a dick now and then. I would be surprised if he called you more names than you called him, but it is not out of the question. If it was the former, I think you'd be surprised.
One thing is certain. You have called me more names, questioned my character, questioned my skills, questioned my intelligence and so on far more than I ever do the same to you. See the bits in red above, for example. You are quite the name-caller actually, and when you complain about other people returning the favor, it is damned hilarious. Jim
JimJust in case the above is not clear to readers, I'll give an example. Earlier in the thread, Rich said: "You're acting like a hysterical woke leftist woman now." I would define that as a derogatory name call. Rich would flat out deny this. Not sure if he would say that it is "true" a "fact" or that there is nothing inherently wrong with women, woke people, or leftists, or some such other dodge. If I took the bet that particular phrase would be on my list of "name-calls" because Rich's intent, in context, was undeniably denigration. Even so, Rich would deny this. Of course. That is a fact. Jim
