Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Do you have anything additional to put forth. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

It doesn't matter to the left and the Democrat party that they are putting females in Danger from angry Trans-gender males, they have an agenda to push and that is first and foremost the most important thing to them.

They don't care about the safety of women in society, they have social engineering to engage in and if a few women get hurt or even killed in the process, they are just collateral damage as far as the Democrat party is concerned. 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/transgender-cheerleader-attacked-teammate-camp

Headline:   25-year-old transgender cheerleader kicked out of cheer camp after allegedly choking female teammate for saying that the transgender cheerleader is a 'man with a penis'

From the article above:   Transgender cheerleader Averie Chanel Medlock, 25, was booted from the cheer camp at Ranger College for allegedly assaulting a female cheerleader.

Fox News reported, "Medlock alleges that a teammate made transphobic and racist remarks before the altercation, with cell phone video showing other cheerleaders hiding in a room from an agitated Medlock."

Medlock posted a video on social media, where Medlock went to the door of Karleigh's room and reportedly said, "If anyone has a problem, come address it to my face like an adult."

Karleigh contacted her dad about the incident, and claimed that Medlock choked her.

Karleigh's father posted a message about the incident on social media, "I ask you what you would have done when receiving a phone call at 1 o’clock in the morning from your daughter stating they had locked themselves in the room with other girls, after this person said You want to fight, and proceeded to put their hands around my daughters neck.”

When police purportedly questioned Medlock about putting Medlock's hands on the other cheerleader's throat, Medlock said Medlock was only joking.



But not to worry, because the left has an agenda to push and that is first and foremost MORE important than the safety of young female cheerleaders.  

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

You know, I think we all owe Richard a debt of gratitude, without his constant and numerous postings with all the name calling, innuendo, machismo, misogynistic, blowhard bullying, along with a big heaping helping of self inflated ego this forum would probably just wither away from lack of traffic.

An honorable mention has to go to any of us who have the will or energy to go after Richard at all is another testament why this forum doesn't die like the rest of the AM forums have.

Long live Richard, King of the D's.

Now does that post only count as one name called in the name calling derby? LOL.

Hey, I'm not proud. I'm just as big of a douchebag as the next slob over there.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Still stinging eh Water Boy?  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

My words as I wrote them in the OP:   we all have been told by the leftist Democrats on this forum and elsewhere, that this kind of thing almost Never occurs. 

On this forum:  Rod Kaufman

Elsewhere: The HUFFINGTON Post.


Now you've conveniently discounted the Huffington Post, but I have proven my statement to be factual.

Is there anything else I need to provide for your education and for your correction?  

You let me know Water Boy.  

Originally Posted by James Brown

Point the Rod Kaufman bit out for me in your initial replies, would you please?  I don't think Rod Kaufman has ever stated that self defense with a gun almost never occurs.  I assume that you are just making this up, after the fact, since you know now that you were in the wrong.  I am willing to look at Rod's posts if you think he did say self defense with a gun almost never occurs.  Until then, James characterization of you as a serial liar seems pretty accurate to me.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

My words as I wrote them in the OP:   we all have been told by the leftist Democrats on this forum and elsewhere, that this kind of thing almost Never occurs. 

On this forum:  Rod Kaufman

Elsewhere: The HUFFINGTON Post.


Now you've conveniently discounted the Huffington Post, but I have proven my statement to be factual.

Is there anything else I need to provide for your education and for your correction?  

You let me know Water Boy.  

Originally Posted by James Lacey

https://www.npr.org/sections/2022-live-primary-election-race-results/2022/08/02/1108929419/kansas-primary-election-results

Voters in Kansas rejected a proposed state constitutional amendment that would have said there was no right to an abortion in the state. The amendment could have opened the door to more abortion restrictions in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

If this can happen in red-state Kansas, it can occur in any state of the union. Voters rejected the proposal in a huge double-digit loss for supporters of the amendment. It looks like about 20% of GOP voters rejected the amendment, and there was a substantial Democratic turnout. Like I've said, I think the GOP failed to entirely grasp the consequences of overturning Roe v. Wade. Of course, there will be lots of back-and-forth over what this portends for the mid-term elections, but it sure doesn't look good for the GOP. State's rights indeed.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

52

The #7 response here.  

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

The one issue voters who supported the overturning of Row v. Wade got what they wanted. The GOP used it as a wedge issue for years and now they can't and they energized democrats at the same time. Might not be the red wave they were all predicting. We will see.