Originally Posted by Richard Davis
It wouldn't bother me a bit. Why should it?
I don't find this credible. History demonstrates that you would reply to my hypothetical inflammatory post with a long and angry rebuttal full of all-cap shouting.
I personally think there are a couple of
reasonable replies to my inflammatory hypothetical, some may think of other reasonable replies.
1. One could point out that the number of folks who actually feel this way is a vanishingly small number of mass murderers. This was basically my reply to your original post.
2. One could point out that the original hypothetical post was once again a fabrication and blatantly dishonest caricature of the right. This was James' reply to your original post.
3. One could observe that he personally is on the right and he does not feel this way. i.e. Jim M's reply.
The person who posted my hypothetical would have to be a true weasel to respond to any of these replies with: "I never said
everyone on the right..."