Then there's Fauci.......Posted By James Brown |
We have always been talking about reinfection rates. In that thread and this one too. If we (or Rich) was talking about something else, please let me know.Originally Posted by James Lacey
Here are other things I said in the same thread. We were talking about reinfection rates.
https://astromart.com/forums/commentary-careful-read-the-terms-of-service/politics/dr-marty-makary-top-epidemiologist-at-johns-hopkins-university-says-about-natural-immunity-vs-vaccinated-immunity?page=4#post182796
Regarding the claims that natural immunity is more effective than the vaccine, several studies from the CDC say precisely the opposite. For example, from August 13, 2021, the analysis below shows how people with a natural infection are 2.3 times more likely to get reinfection than those vaccinated.
But let's set aside actual scientific studies and articles for the moment and think about it logically. The immune response from a natural infection can be pretty variable. Depending on how much viral load you received, you may have a strong or weak response. The vaccine guarantees a strong reaction. Also, a natural infection makes antibodies to all proteins from the virus that your immune system recognizes as foreign. Even the ones that have nothing to do with the infectious nature of the virus. Thus, your immune system is wasting a lot of energy and effort fighting unnecessary things. The vaccine elicits a response to only the spike protein and is a targetted and robust response that is much better at preventing and neutralizing the infection. The science says, and the data says, the vaccine is better. There is no serious debate about this among professionals and experts.