Peace in the Middle EastPosted By James Lacey |
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
The latest from Trump on Hamas disarming, a key point in the peace deal:
"President Trump said Tuesday he expected Hamas to decommission its weapons as stipulated in the negotiated peace agreement, or the U.S. would step in."
“They’re going to disarm, because they said they were going to disarm,” Trump said. “And if they don’t disarm, we will disarm them.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5555070-trump-hamas-disarmament-gaza/
In other words, we'd have to put troops on the ground to do it. I'd be skeptical about Trump actually doing it, particularly after claiming now to have ended eight wars.
I will give Trump credit, however, for actions related to getting the hostages back and for bombing the Iranian nuke sites (despite the equivocal results), something other presidents have inferred but had never did, so at least as far as the middle east is considered, he is being taken seriously.
If only he'd be as aggressive in aiding Ukraine against the continual Russian assaults--here he talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk...
If there is one thing about Trump that we have learned, it's that he talks too much and is indiscreet and careless. It's the main reason he's earned the moniker TACO.
It will be interesting to see if he gives Ukraine Tomahawks, as this would represent a significant escalation in capability for Ukraine to strike deep into Russia. As long as the Putin regime doesn't see an existential threat, I doubt they will respond in kind with nukes, but they certainly will have a response, and it will likely be significant, at least in the short term. Perhaps it will prompt Russia to negotiate for peace with realistic concessions, but then again, maybe not. It's a gamble for sure.