Image of the day

Captured by
Shane Yarnall

LDN 1622

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

September 23, 2019 01:38 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Its pretty easy.  All I do is look at your postings Rod, and they mirror CNN to a tee. 

It doesn't take Rocket Science to figure it out.  LOL  tongue
Here's Fox News On Trump blasting them by saying they don't work for him any more:
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6082377395001/#sp=show-clips
Ya gonna troll them too?

September 23, 2019 03:31 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck



LOL <snort>
You beat me to it!...

September 23, 2019 05:45 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Well, when you can name one single reporter or anchor over at CNN or MSNBC who even leans the tiniest bit to the right, politically, then you can snort, but until then, you 2 haven't got a clue!  tongue
No Mr Troll, you don't have a clue. CNN, on virtually a daily basis (and unlike Fox), has both left and right right wing political commentators who offer their views on the issues at hand. Rick Santorum, Kayleigh McEnany, and Ana Navarro are frequent contributors of conservative Republican viewpoints. The anchors and reporters on CNN provide the news on the issues and stories of the day in unbiased presentation of the facts known at the time the story breaks. It's up to the commentators to provide their perspectives on the stories. 

September 23, 2019 08:58 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

LOL! 

I'm not speaking about the GUESTS they have on Dummy. I'm speaking about Anchors such as Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, John King, Stephanie Rule, Brooke Baldwin, Alison Camerota, and the other liberals. Do you understand the difference?  

Rick Santorum doesn't host any shows you fool.  Hell, there isn't ONE conservative Republican host, and here's a clue for you Ana Navarro is the furthest thing from a conservative that there is.  Just because that little fat girl tells you she's a conservative Republican, doesn't mean she is. She's a complete hysterical moron.  They may have paid contributors, but I'm talking about people who are the 'reporters' over there, that don't have opinion shows.  Leland Vittert does a news segment at the same time every Sunday and Shepard Smith has a news Segment from 3PM to 4PM EST every single day.  Arthel Neville has a news segment every Sunday.  They are not  "contributors", they are PAID anchors with a regular schedule.  

They are all liberals, and there are more than a few Never Trumpers that host shows during the week.  Neil Cavuto is certainly no Trump supporter.  Juan Williams is very far left, hates Trump, and he's a regular Paid DAILY Host on the Fox Show "The Five".  

If you look up the FoxNews website, you'll see him there on there lineup. He not an occassional guest. He's the actual host you fool.

Here's the CNN ROSTER:  https://www.cnn.com/specials/tv/anchors-and-reporters

Show me where Kayleigh McEnany, Rick Santorum, or Ana Navarro is listed as an anchor, reporter, or correspondent you tool?  

They aren't.  You need to get a clue but for you that is a real chore! 

Good grief you are such a MEAT head!  LOL 

 
Hey Ding dong, I already stated in my post that the anchors and the reporters state the facts on the issues and the political commentators on both sides present their views on them. That's as simple as one can state it for the reading comprehension-challenged on the forum...

September 24, 2019 09:12 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

"You claimed that CNN has more people on their staff who are conservatives than Fox has liberals. "
Davis and your above quote is as full of it as it comes... 

September 25, 2019 08:55 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

I would have preferred to wait until the transcripts have been released and the whistleblower complaint heard.before proceeding with impeachment proceedings.  

September 26, 2019 09:09 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

I would have too, but there is zero chance the whistleblowers allegations would ever have made it to Congress without this proceeding. House dems had no choice (and every right) in my opinion to launch this inquiry. If it tuns out to be nothing, they can vote not to impeach him themselves. The fact that a Trump-appointed Inspector General raised this as a serious and credible threat to US securty, and was blocked from giving it to Congress, is why we are here, nothing more.
Naw, Trump can call the president of another country to get dirt on his chief political opponent. It's in the constitution. It's called "executive privilege". You get your own lawyer to do it, too. Then when some partisan hack that everybody except Trump seems to know but him, calls him on it, he pleads not guilty by denying he did it, calls the partisan hack who may yet turn out to be a Trump appointee, a political hitman and and sits back and thinks he's done with it. I thought you could only see that on the AM but then I read it on Fox...

September 26, 2019 11:27 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

You can put the worst case spin on it. I can also go the other way and say the phone call was hardly the demise of our democracy.
People would have screamed if Trump's kid had that job.
An edit-Biden is now toast.
I don't know how you could possibly come to that conclusion. You really do have to stop reading Fox...

September 26, 2019 12:08 PM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer
Lordy the comedy just keeps coming......belly laugh this morning and another tonight.
Yeah Greg, that's right, Trump and the prez from Ukraine were just exchanging pleasantries, telling jokes while talking about the weather. And the hoopla about this whistleblower, I mean nobody knew who he really was until we read about him on the AM today so we got the scoop on whoever it is before the prez did. 
Ya gotta love the AM... 

September 27, 2019 11:37 AM Forum: Politics

Really?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Lacey


I've read them, and they are incredibly damning. The complaint alleges that White House lawyers have been stuffing politically troubling records of presidential calls into highly classified storage to hide them from scrutiny throughout Trump's Presidency. The complaint cites multiple US officials who can independently corroborate the charges. Trump has been using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 US election, and now we know where all the evidence can be found. Trump is so fucked.
i see the stock marketing is betting Trump will be impeached but not removed from office:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/business/trump-impeachment-predict-markets/index.html
I suspect the same with Republicans in control of the senate running interference for Trump no matter what. Let's take a hypothetical example. Remember when Trump said he could shoot someone in Times square and get away with it? Well, let's say Lindsey Graham witnessed it but when it came time for the trial, here's what you'd get:"Well, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, whereas I did see him raise and shoot the rifle and a man did go down but I didn't actually see the shot." "I mean it wasn't a tracer round and nobody can see a round leaving a rifle at that kind of velocity so there's no way I can testify beyond the shadow of a doubt that the man holding and firing the rifle actually killed the man in question." "Therefore, in all good conscience, I can truthfully say under oath that I didn't really see Mr Trump shoot that man."
In essence, that's the kind of stonewalling you're going to get...