Image of the day

Captured by
Douglas Rollain

M20 Trifid Nebula in LRGBHa

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Ed Moran

October 14, 2005 02:11 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

DSC problem and solution, your opinions please!

Posted By Ed Moran

Hi All,

My DSC's were not working well with my 12.5" Discovery PDHQ, with the first few goto's falling within a 1.0 fov, but subsequent objects farther and farther out. I discovered (hey, that's almost a pun!) that the hole in the bottom of the rocker box was about 3/16ths of an inch offset to one side, but ok front to back. I plugged the hole and re-drilled it on center and my last time out all objects fell within a 1.0 degree fov all night long. So the problem appears to be resolved. What I would like is your august and learned opinions on my reasoning as to why the 3/16ths offset was a problem. Here goes:

At the eyepiece, with the scope pointed at the horizon, one inch of movement in azimuth = 1.5 degree of movement on the sky (or about the apparent diameter of M42).

This is based on the fact that my eyepiece is about 3 feet from the point in the center of the OTA where the altitude and azimuth axes intersect.

At that radius, a 360 degree circle described by the eyepiece is about 226 inches in circumference. So 360 degrees / 226 inches = 1.5 inch per degree. Therefore a 3/16ths mechanical offset = .25 degree of sky offset.

This value gets worse with the scope pointed up at 45 degrees and higher, since the diameter of the circle (described by the eyepiece when the scope is rotated 360 degrees in azimuth) gets smaller.

Cont. next post.


December 29, 2005 05:20 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Recent mods to my 12.5" PDHQ...

Posted By Ed Moran

The weather prevents actual observing so there's not much left to do except play with the scope in the garage smile

I've flocked the tube wall opposite the focuser, installed a Protostar spider assy and piggybacked my 80mm f/5 shorty. I better think of some additional mods or She Who Must Be Obeyed will put me to work remodeling the bathroom or something equally annoying... :S

February 5, 2006 05:06 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Monokote repair?

Posted By Ed Moran

Hi All,

While removing a strip of velcro from my Discovery PDHQ dobbie I also removed a small piece of the Monokote tube covering, about an inch wide and 4 inches long cwy

Any advice on how to repair this would be gratefully received!!

Thanks in advance,

Ed

February 7, 2006 08:16 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Alan Adler's "cool.exe"

Posted By Ed Moran

Hi All,

I've been playing with Mr. Adler's cool.exe program (Jan. 2002 Sky & Tel.) again and I just noticed something...The program lets you adjust the cooling fan's output using a FPS or feet-per-second value. However....most of the cooling fans I've seen (on websites and in magazine ads) are rated in CFM or cubic-feet-per-minute. If I divide a CFM value by 60 to get a cubic feet per second value it looks like I'll need Pratt & Whitney Double Wasp radial engine to drive a fan at the necessary rate shocked

That being said, the 120mm fan I currently use, rated at 53CFM, seems to work just fine so this question is just out of curiosity I guess...

Ed

October 13, 2006 02:49 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

New Catseye autocollimator...

Posted By Ed Moran

I'm probably late to the parade, but have you all seen this?

http://www.catseyecollimation.com/infinixl.html

A new autocollimator with a smaller peephole, a longer barrel with a larger i.d. and a "brushed" finish on the inside wall.

I have no complaints about my "old model" autocollimator smile although I think the Catseye cheshire could be improved with a smaller peephole...

Ed


November 1, 2006 05:35 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Replacent Secondary Mirror?

Posted By Ed Moran

I'm thinking about replacing the 2.6" minor axis secondary mirror in my 12.5" f/5 Discovery newt. A quick search reveals at least 3 probable sources:

AstroSystems 1/10th wave (p-v or rms?) pyrex $150.00

Protostar .101 lambda (which might mean ~1/10th wave) pyrex $135.00

Antares Optics 1/15th wave (p-v) pyrex $169.00 (Better wave numbers available for extra $$ from Antares)

Since the supplied secondary from Discovery is supposed to be a 1/10th wave mirror I imagine it would be a waste of time/money to get another 1/10th wave mirror so I lean towards the 1/15th wave (or better) Antares product and I know Floyd B. likes the Antares product.

Any thoughts, opinions or experiences with any of these products would be appreciated!

TIA,

Ed Moran

November 17, 2006 03:58 PM Forum: Eyepieces

Eyepiece indentification help, please :-)

Posted By Ed Moran

Attached is a pic of the eyepieces that were included with my 12.5" PDHQ dobbie. I tried them once and relegated them to use with my 80mm f/5 short tube refractor. The large one, a 20mm, is usuable with the little refractor (good eyerelief, edges look fine at 20x) but the smaller one, a 10mm, just stinks up the eyepiece case. Very short eyerelief, poor edge performance, etc. The question is:

What brand are they? Who makes them? I'm just curious...

Thank you,

Ed

August 25, 2002 05:20 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Re: 2" Diagonal Preferences and Opinions! SC

Posted By Ed Moran

1.0 degree with 40mm UO MK-70...

September 14, 2002 04:33 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

SCT Crayford Focusers?

Posted By Ed Moran

Thanks, Bill & Michael. I ordered a Williams Optics unit from Anancortes....3 week backorder. Oh well, it sounds like it's worth the wait.

October 4, 2002 04:54 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Meade $99 EP's on Astromart.

Posted By Ed Moran

It's just my opinion, but asking $300.00+ (from other astronomers) for this special offer set is unrealistic. Especially since they know you payed $99.00. It's true that individually they're worth the $300.00 (or more) but.....

$200-250.00 seems about right, but if a scope store lets you trade them in with a few extra bucks for a 31mm Nagler that's great! Sounds like a good deal to me! My prediction is that not too many will sell on AstroMart at $300.00, but they will move nicely at $250.00 or a bit less.