Image of the day

Captured by
RICHARD COFER

Lunar Occultation of Jupiter (Egress)

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: James Brown

January 8, 2023 11:55 PM Forum: Politics

Speaker of the House election

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by George Blahun
I watched the entire bizarre theatrical production from 10 pm on.  The GOP delegation to Congress has turned into a goddamn joke, and it's not just the full-on fascist wing of the party.  The thing that really annoyed me was Kevin spent his first few minutes as Speaker bitching out the Biden Administration and pandering to the insurrectionists instead of doing what Jeffreys did.  
Claiming that Pelosi was the best speaker in US History?  Lauding Biden's legion of legislative accomplishments?  Would have been kind of weird if McCarthy did what Jeffries did.  

January 9, 2023 11:26 PM Forum: Politics

Speaker of the House election

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by George Blahun

James:
     I'm a little surprised you missed or ignored the point that the moment in the spotlight was spent bitching rather than stating a positive vision for the years ahead.  If I missed the humorous or sarcastic intent of your comment, I apologize.
No worries.  This is not a great medium for humor and sarcasm.

January 11, 2023 11:57 PM Forum: Politics

Classified Documents found at Biden's Private Office, illegally taken by him. May have sold Nuclear Secrets to China.

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
Apples and Oranges:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3806250-differences-in-the-trump-biden-classified-document-discoveries/
and
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/10/politics/biden-classified-documents-trump-garland/index.html
and 
https://www.newsweek.com/how-joe-biden-classified-documents-compare-donald-trumps-1772552

Do you think Rich and the MAGATs will comprehend the differenceS ?

Riight...
Hi Jim, Rod, and Rich:

Of course there seem to be huge differences in the cooperation, quantity of documents and so on.  Still, I think one would have to be pretty naïve to believe that this embarrassing faux pas by Biden does not eviscerate the government's ability to actually prosecute Trump for his documents or even his alleged obstruction concerning those documents.  Explaining to a jury and justifying the nuanced differences between this affair, Clinton's email server, and Trump's documents at Mar-a-Lago is not something any DOJ lawyer would relish.

Like I said months ago, all of the investigations and hearings about Trump in '21 and '22 and the raids on Mar-a-Lago are going to backfire immensely if his political foes can't actually take Trump down.  Has there been any real progress toward taking him down?  A lot of noise of course, which people who already hate Trump think is meaningful, but how about an indictment that can be successfully prosecuted?

I am going to be extremely upset if Biden's ineptness, Congress's drama last year, and more ineffective drama to come end up installing Trump as president in '24.  Jim

January 12, 2023 12:11 AM Forum: Politics

SCOTUS John Robert's Year End Nothingburger Report

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
And thanks to the cons on the court:
"The American public no longer believes the Supreme Court is impartial"
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3807849-the-american-public-no-longer-believes-the-supreme-court-is-impartial/
Hogwash.  From your own article it is obvious that the public is polarized, rather than the court being "not impartial."   Compare 2015 to 2022.  You know what case was decided in 2015 that pissed the R's so and energized the D's?  Obergfell (gay marriage).

I am defining "not impartial" as follows:  "Deciding cases based upon politically desired outcomes rather than through legitimate constitutional interpretation."   Under this definition, the allegations of "not impartial" are the immature whines of a partisan public that is too stupid and too glued to Facebook or their favorite talking head anchor person to even try to understand the Court's processes or reasoning in close cases.  Was Obergfell also decided as a politically desirable outcome?  Of course not.  The 14th Amendment mandated the Obergefell result under the legitimate school of Constitutional interpretation applied by the majority.  Did the fact that Thomas disagreed mean that the majority was being partisan?  Of course not.  Now the shoe is flipped and people like you apparently think that the reasoning in Dobbs is illegitimate and political.  Sheesh.     

Conservative justices follow legitimate conservative schools of constitutional interpretation.  Liberal justices follow legitimate liberal schools of constitutional interpretation.  Period.  This is not a sign of any failure of impartiality.  To allege otherwise is ridiculous.   The justices understand this among themselves, which is why RBG and Scalia were such good friends of course.  Too bad the public is so easily led into bogus allegations of partiality.  The press has undermined the Court since Trump made his first appointment.  Eternal and undying shame on them.  Jim

January 12, 2023 01:28 AM Forum: Politics

SCOTUS John Robert's Year End Nothingburger Report

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
The ACTIONS of several of the SCOTUS justices, all of them cons, are a significant contributing factor that belies the public trust in the court. Specifically, Thomas failing to recuse himself in cases that his wife has advocated on in relation to attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. (Not to mention him appearing on his wife's conservative talk show).  Alito traveling to another country to advocate for an anti abortion position and Barrett running to the McConnell center shortly after being appointed in order to decry criticism that the court is somehow partisan in front a staunchly conservative audience.  
If Roberts were to institute a code of ethics for his own court, it would go a long way to attenuate these actions and improve the public's perception of SCOTUS. Sadly, he will do nothing... 
This is silly.  The only Court action that is either thrilling or upsetting 99% of the public the Dobbs decision.  The press has painted that as a political maneuver, rather than the entirely predictable result of decades-old concepts of conservative constitutional law construction.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg was the most politically active justice in the past century.  I posted a list of her political speeches some time ago.  She was not a shy woman.  Yet she has been canonized by the left.  No worries for me, I liked the notorious RGB a lot.  But the fact that her activism is inspirational to a generation and any weak by comparison activism by  Alito or others is reprehensible says a lot.

January 12, 2023 01:41 AM Forum: Politics

David Koch's 1980 Vice-Presidential Platform. The genesis of modern conservatism...

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by David Cotterell
This is the call for the death of the American middle class.  And I see the same thinking up here in Canada from our Conservative Party at both the provincial and federal levels.  See also, the UK, Europe, etc., wherever 'populist conservative' parties are active.  

— “We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.
— “We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.
— “We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.
— “We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.
— “We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.
— “We propose the abolition of the governmental Postal Service.
— “We oppose all personal and corporate income taxation, including capital gains taxes.
— “We support the eventual repeal of all taxation.
— “As an interim measure, all criminal and civil sanctions against tax evasion should be terminated immediately.
— “We support repeal of all law which impede the ability of any person to find employment, such as minimum wage laws.
— “We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.
— “We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws.
— “We support the repeal of all taxes on the income or property of private schools, whether profit or non-profit.
— “We support the abolition of the Environmental Protection Agency.”
— “We support abolition of the Department of Energy.
— “We call for the dissolution of all government agencies concerned with transportation, including the Department of Transportation.
— “We demand the return of America’s railroad system to private ownership. We call for the privatization of the public roads and national highway system.
— “We specifically oppose laws requiring an individual to buy or use so-called ‘self-protection’ equipment such as safety belts, air bags, or crash helmets.
— “We advocate the abolition of the Federal Aviation Administration.
— “We advocate the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration.
— “We support an end to all subsidies for child-bearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children.
— “We oppose all government welfare, relief projects, and ‘aid to the poor’ programs. All these government programs are privacy-invading, paternalistic, demeaning, and inefficient. The proper source of help for such persons is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.
— “We call for the privatization of the inland waterways, and of the distribution system that brings water to industry, agriculture and households.
— “We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
— “We call for the abolition of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
— “We support the repeal of all state usury laws.”


This is scary beyond belief.  


Dave
Hi Dave:

I gotta ask.  Why would you find a nearly 50 year old platform of the Libertarian party scary?   You realize, don't you, that the Libertarians got exactly, wait for it, (0) zero electoral college votes in 1980?  Angela Davis ran as VP for the Commies in 1980 too.  Is she more your cup of tea?  Hell, according to Wikki, Rock star Joe Walsh ran a mock campaign as a write-in candidate, promising to make his song "Life's Been Good" the new national anthem if he won, and running on a platform of "Free Gas For Everyone."   He got about as many votes as the Libertarians.

Sure, a few hard-core libertarians still exist and still subscribe to the "abolish all government" philosophy.  These hard core Libertarians have no political clout.  At all.  None.  Look at the ballooning scope of the federal government under both parties from 1980 to now!   For you to consider this 50 year old platform, which has never received any mainstream traction at all "scary" is about the same as considering Mein Kompf "scary" for modern politics, just because there still exist some neo-nazis in the dark corners of society.   Jim 

January 12, 2023 01:46 AM Forum: Politics

David Koch's 1980 Vice-Presidential Platform. The genesis of modern conservatism...

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
Insurrectionists want the government to fail. They want to shutdown the government. They want Democracy to fail. Those are their goals. They're essentially anarchists and THEY complain about Antifa...
The Proud Boys etc. and Antifa are all the same to rational people.  They are a tiny minority population of criminals who mask their crimes in political rhetoric.  But hey, they almost brought the United States to its knees on Jan 6, right?  That was sarcasm, in case anyone missed it.

The ability of people to overestimate the political impact of the criminal enterprises of a tiny group of criminals amazes me.

January 12, 2023 01:52 AM Forum: Politics

David Koch's 1980 Vice-Presidential Platform. The genesis of modern conservatism...

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Brown

The Proud Boys etc. and Antifa are all the same to rational people.  They are a tiny minority population of criminals who mask their crimes in political rhetoric.  But hey, they almost brought the United States to its knees on Jan 6, right?  That was sarcasm, in case anyone missed it.

The ability of people to overestimate the political impact of the criminal enterprises of a tiny group of criminals amazes me.
p.s. the ability of our political parties to leverage the political impact of the criminal enterprises of a tiny group of criminals does not amaze me.  This is just the way politics is done.  But does everyone have to fall for the overheated rhetoric?  

Every time?

For goodness sake David, did this 50 year old platform show up on your Facebook feed this morning?  Let me guess, is it being sold as the current and imminently dangerous philosophy of the GOP?  Wake up my man, the GOP are just as "big government" as the Democrats in 2023.

January 12, 2023 01:58 AM Forum: Politics

David Koch's 1980 Vice-Presidential Platform. The genesis of modern conservatism...

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

"The ability of people to overestimate the political impact of the criminal enterprises of a tiny group of criminals amazes me."
Except when it's part of a coup plot orchestrated by a defeated president. Your ability to underestimate that amazes me...
Bring out the indictments then!  If Trump is proved in court to have "orchestrated" Jan 6, then I am fine with hanging him till death in front of the Capitol as a message to all traitors.   When does the trial start? 

Until then, you are just the consumer and the purveyor of ridiculously overheated rhetoric.

January 12, 2023 02:06 AM Forum: Politics

David Koch's 1980 Vice-Presidential Platform. The genesis of modern conservatism...

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by David Cotterell
This is the call for the death of the American middle class.  And I see the same thinking up here in Canada from our Conservative Party at both the provincial and federal levels.  See also, the UK, Europe, etc., wherever 'populist conservative' parties are active.  

— “We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.
— “We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.
— “We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.
— “We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.
— “We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.
— “We propose the abolition of the governmental Postal Service.
— “We oppose all personal and corporate income taxation, including capital gains taxes.
— “We support the eventual repeal of all taxation.
— “As an interim measure, all criminal and civil sanctions against tax evasion should be terminated immediately.
— “We support repeal of all law which impede the ability of any person to find employment, such as minimum wage laws.
— “We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.
— “We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws.
— “We support the repeal of all taxes on the income or property of private schools, whether profit or non-profit.
— “We support the abolition of the Environmental Protection Agency.”
— “We support abolition of the Department of Energy.
— “We call for the dissolution of all government agencies concerned with transportation, including the Department of Transportation.
— “We demand the return of America’s railroad system to private ownership. We call for the privatization of the public roads and national highway system.
— “We specifically oppose laws requiring an individual to buy or use so-called ‘self-protection’ equipment such as safety belts, air bags, or crash helmets.
— “We advocate the abolition of the Federal Aviation Administration.
— “We advocate the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration.
— “We support an end to all subsidies for child-bearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children.
— “We oppose all government welfare, relief projects, and ‘aid to the poor’ programs. All these government programs are privacy-invading, paternalistic, demeaning, and inefficient. The proper source of help for such persons is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.
— “We call for the privatization of the inland waterways, and of the distribution system that brings water to industry, agriculture and households.
— “We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
— “We call for the abolition of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
— “We support the repeal of all state usury laws.”


This is scary beyond belief.  

Dave
p.s. Dave - this is so dopey I have to keep re-reading it.  "The genesis of modern conservatism" my ass!  How many of these Libertarian bullet points have been enacted between 1980 and now, by conservative presidents Regan, Bush, Bush, and arguably Trump?  How many?

Zero, none, zilch, nada.

How many bills have even been proposed to enact any of these bullet points?  I bet it is zero.  You can tell all your buddies that the there is not a dime's worth of difference (I think it was Ralph Nader who first said that) between the Rs and the Ds in the US when it comes to an expansive federal government.  That ship sailed about a hundred years ago.

Jim