Jay Sekulow, US Constitutional legal scholar who has argued before the Supreme Court nearly 2 dozen times..Posted By James Brown |
I think you might be confusing Jay with his kid Jordan, but it does not matter. https://aclj.org/government-corruption/trump-indictment-soros-funded-da-chooses-political-prosecution-and-ignores-violent-criminalsOriginally Posted by Richard DavisIn cases involving our Basic 1st amendment rights to free speech, now says we are living in a Banana Republic, reminiscent of countries like Venezuela.
Imagine that.
A real, honest, rule of law driven lawyer who has argued many, many times in front of the US Supreme Court, and not only argued but Won the majority of cases he represented.
Just read his statement below:
Jay Sekulow:
"The radical Left has turned America into a banana republic. The indictment and political prosecution of President Trump weaponizes the justice system – lawfare.
Rather than prosecuting rising violent crime, a rogue, Soros-backed prosecutor in New York City indicted President Trump.
I personally argued at the Supreme Court on behalf of President Trump that we can't allow 2,300 local prosecutors to harass a President for politically motivated reasons.
You expect despicable political prosecutions like this in third-world dictatorships, not America. We look like Venezuela here.
We must all stand for the Constitution and oppose this dangerous, two-tiered justice system.
At the ACLJ, we are dedicated to defending the Constitution and will raise any necessary constitutional issues as this case makes its way through the courts.
Demand Congress investigate the abuse of power and that DAs prosecute violent criminals harming Americans. Stop the political prosecutions.
Sign Our NEW Petition: Stop the Political Prosecution of Trump.
Jay Sekulow
ACLJ Chief Counsel
Just remember folks, so many agenda driven "Lawyers" in this nation have thrown out and tossed into the waste can their ethics, their principles, and their legal character because their TDS filled minds guide them to ignore their obligation to speak out against those attempting to destroy the very foundation upon which this nation was built.
You will see these "Lawyers" mostly on the left, because they have forgotten what it means to act on principle rather than their petty anger towards one man in this country.
But you will also see others as well, claiming to support the Rule of Law and the Consititution of the USA. I surely don't buy it.
Those who have ethical integrity will stand up and speak out. Others will cower.
Jay Sekulow and others like him? Stand up guys who are willing to speak out against tyranny.
Others who don't say a word and even stand with the tyrants? Frauds who only talk the talk, they don't walk the walk.
As Edmund Burke once wrote:"The only thing necessary for the Triump of Evil is for Good men to do nothing"
I still can't figure out what your point in this thread or the other thread might be. Do you deny that Trump is receiving due process? Do you advocate for stripping grand juries of the right to indict? I would really like to hear, in your own words, what the problem with this indictment might be?
The way I see it, is this: If Bragg has no case he'll lose. The deck is stacked in the defendant's favor. Trump's strategists should be and probably are rejoicing in the indictment. This indictment and prosecution will make Trump stronger. Unless he is convicted, maybe. Is conviction what you are worried about? I'm not sure even conviction will hurt Trump with his base.
Jim