Posts Made By: James Brown

Ray Medhurst said:
So you aren't going to read the Pentagon Papers, the Hitz Report, or the documents released about the CIA in the Freedom of Information Act?

"The documents released about the CIA in the Freedom of Information Act"

All of them? Thats a lot of reading don't you think!?

But to answer your question:

No, I am not going to read them. Are you?

- Jim -

Is reposting this kind of stuff on Astromart spam? Should we be offended or amused? I don't know. I find this particular piece pretty harmless but then it does dovetail nicely with my conservative worldview.

For those interested in the history of this particular slice of spam, go here:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp

You might find it interesting to note that the piece was originally (allegedly) addressed to Dr. Laura. Only recently has it been re-directed toward the president.

We also saw this slice o' spam over on the Religion forum not too long ago. It has been posted there at least twice, most recently by our good buddy Ray Medhurst (Eric Gage provided a nicely done theologically sound rebuttal):

http://www.astromart.com/forums/viewpost.asp?forum_post_id=278166&poll_id=&news_id=&page=

You can find it here too (in its original Dr. Laura format):

http://www.astromart.com/forums/viewpost.asp?forum_post_id=147605&poll_id=&news_id=&page=

I'm standing in for Chris Nicholl by calling out the tedious redundancy. Chris is presumably in mourning, and if you do not know why, you have not been paying attention! - Jim -

Here is a baby surfacing for air.

Gorgeous! I lived on the double topped mountain just to the right of center on your photo's skyline from 1986 to 1999. It is very sensibly named "Double Header" mountain. You obtained great resolution on your photo because one can see the tower on the South peak of Doubleheader. That is very hard to see in broad daylight from Littleton! - Jim -

I think this is an Egret, correct me if I'm wrong!

Hi Eddie:

I also read the Teegul comments on the TEC yahoo group. I own a Teegul, and I own a TEC 140. I do not have the courage to put my TEC on the stock Lapides Teegul. The connection between the two axes of the mount seems too light weight.

I love the Teegul. The slow motion controls are fabulous of course. I am sure that Discmounts, large Giros, and the other heavy duty alt-az solutions are wonderful pieces of engineering. On the other hand, the Teegul slow motion controls and very nice axis locks allow you to bump a scope accidentally, or change eyepieces without worrying about re-acquiring the viewing object.

I think you are about right regarding the Teegul's appropriate capacity. Mine worked great with an 80mm refractor. I have read about using an AP 130 with the Teegul, but that is a famously compact and light scope.

Thus, I personally am thinking about machining some large scale reinforcement parts to beef up the Teegul. In particular, I want to beef up the connection between the two axes. I would love to use the Teegul with my APO 140. I just don't think it's up to the task now. My humble opinion of course. - Jim -

At least you could spell the man's name correctly when you defame him.

Thanks for the words of encouragement. This is going to be fun.

- Jim -

Arkansas is in the USA? :S

That is disturbing news.

- Jim -

I gleaned this from the internet, so I can't vouch for its accuracy, but it seems reasonable:

Length of the past 5 conclaves:

Pope Pius XII: 1 Day; 3 Ballots; elected 3/2/39

Pope John XXIII: 3 Days; 11 Ballots; elected 10/28/58

Pope Paul VI: 2 Days; 6 Ballots; elected 6/21/63

Pope John Paul I: 1 Day; 4 Ballots; elected 8/26/78

Pope John Paul II: 2 Days; 8 Ballots; elected 10/16/78

However, John Paul II instituted an important rule change:

"To be elected Pope, one Cardinal must receive more than two-thirds of the votes. Except that, under the new rules established by Pope John Paul II, if 30 ballots have taken place without any Cardinal being elected Pope, then the Cardinals may then elect by simple majority. This is an important change and may well be the most important change made. In the past, it has often been the case that a particular candidate has had solid majority support but cannot garner the required two-thirds majority, eg, because he is too conservative to satisfy the more moderate Cardinals. Therefore a compromise candidate is chosen, either an old Pope who will die soon and not do much until the next conclave (which is what was intended with John XXIII!) or someone not so hard-line wins support. The difference now will be that if, in the early ballots, one candidate has strong majority support, there is less incentive for that majority to compromise with the cardinals who are against their candidate and they simply need to sit out 30 ballots to elect their man. This may well see much more "hard-line" Popes being elected, and given the conservative trend of most appointments to the College by Pope John Paul II, it is almost certainly going to be a man cut from the same cloth. There will also be far less incentive for the Cardinals to finish quickly as in the past. After such a long papacy, they may need time to arrive at a strong consensus on what type of papacy the Church now needs. They will also be staying in comfortable lodgings, rather than sleeping in foldaway cots in hallways and offices in the Sistine Chapel.


The cardinals vote on the afternoon of the first day, then twice each morning and once each afternoon. If they have not elected someone within the first nine votes, then they may devote up to a day to prayer and discussion before resuming. They may do the same every seven unsuccessful votes after that. The Cardinals are not permitted any contact with the outside world: no mobile phones, no newspapers or television, no messages or letters or signals to observers. There will be regular sweeps of all relevant areas for listening devices. The Cardinals will for the first time be visible, at least twice daily, to the observing world, when they move the 350 metres from the Domus Sanctae Marthae to the Sistine Chapel and back again. No doubt, Vatican "experts" will be hired to expound at length on what the countenance of certain key Cardinals indicates as they are filmed moving to and from the Chapel!"

http://www.catholic-pages.com/pope/election.asp

I must say, that as a Catholic, I find the intense media coverage and high interest of non-Catholic persons kind of wierd. Why do you all care who is Pope? We here in the states by and large don't follow other international elections nearly this closely.

- Jim -

p.s. Darrell: The Holy Spirt is merely toying with the media. When the Holy Spirit is ready, the Cardinals will listen.