Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I have been saying this for years.... 

Now that you are retired Jim, you might want to consider a side gig in the field of "screed generation."  You're a natural!

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Try again, dodgeball.

You wrote this:  "I have been saying this for years. Some Christians just ain't Christians anymore".

So then, I'll reiterate again, You're the judge of whom is and is not a Christian.

Your statement above says it all about you.

You make a blanket statement about those Christians who don't think like you, and then profess that they aren't Christians.

Based upon What, your sanctimony?  Is that it?  

If not, then upon what do you base your judgement call about them?  

It appears that you read a story from one single guy who makes claims, which in all honesty I would bet are well exaggerated by him, and therefore YOU the self-righteous are to be taken as gospel because he told you something that you wanted to hear about Trump supporters and the right wing?  

Is that how it works, or do you just not like someone else doing the exact same thing to you, that you just did with your posting, calling out all these evangelicals who do not have your mindset, as NOT Christians?

Is that what got you all riled up Jim?  

You surely don't like being judged by me the way you yourself just blanketly judged with utmost contempt and sanctimony, those with whom you disagree politically.

Hypocrite much Jim??  

Funny - Jim posts a commonplace and pretty much indisputable turn of phrase, "Some Christians just ain't Christians anymore" and you act as if Jim has claimed he will be sitting at the right hand of Christ, and personally making all the close calls on judgement day.   

"Lighten up Maurice."  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVAxpNdkFE8

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Well I suppose as impotent as you appear to be, to refute any of the statements I submitted, then the next best thing for an intellectual lightweight would be to simply label the facts I put forth as "screed"

But then again, most of the time you don't have a cogent rebuttal.

You could of course adopt James's tired, worn out accusation of "outrage".

That might suit you as well since you don't seem to be able to debate any of the points I posited. 

Don't be stupid Rich, you claim that your 20 or so talking points are "facts" and I'm supposed to refute your BS?   Ha. Ha.  Here is one refutation, provided because I want to, that is germane to our discussions yesterday.  You claimed:

"So when the US Gov't weaponizes the largest, most powerful law enforcement agency with no limit on the pocketbook and goes after ONE individual, violating his rights to a fair trial, and systematically ignores the crimes and corruption of the other President in office who is of the opposite political party, the idea should be to ignroe it and "turn the other cheek"?

The theory of a weaponized government is not a fact.  It is a widely disseminated opinion held by some and disputed by others.  You are apparently too stupid to know the difference between fact and opinion.   

And the bit about, "violating his rights to a fair trial"  That is not a fact, and not even a widely held opinion.  This is just BS made up by Trump and his sycophants and you lap it up like the loyal dog you are. We had this exact same conversation about the Jan 6 defendants.   You posted unsubstantiated BS about them being held without charge in solitary confinement for years and I schooled you.  I was embarrassed for you.  So what actual facts do you have supporting this contention of "violating his rights to a fair trial?"   Actual facts dude.  Time to put up or shut up.  (Neither putting up or shutting up is remotely likely of course).

I'll help get you started.  The Constitution guarantees a fair criminal trial.   There are many aspects to this right.

Is Trump not apprised of the charges against him?
Is Trump unable to present evidence in his defense?
Is Trump held in jail without bond?
Is Trump being denied his right against compelled self-incrimination?   (Of course not, but he sure enjoys self-incrimination nonetheless)
Is Trump being denied counsel?
Is Trump being denied a speedy trial?
Is Trump denied a preliminary hearing where the government must show probable cause to proceed?
Is Trump being denied the benefits of the government's burden to show proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
Is Trump being denied a jury?

And so on...

Bottom line, your post is laced with opinion at best, and unsubstantiated BS at worst.  It is not my job or anyone else's job to correct you (although schooling you is fun is small doses).  No, it is only our obligation to laugh and shake our heads in amazement when you post stuff like this and in your delusional state call it "facts"!  Jim

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

You seem to equate the words some and all. 


from Imgflip Meme Generator
" />

Indeed.   Inigo Montoya could also be questioning Richard's understanding of the word "fact."

Originally Posted by James Lacey

When your attorney participates in the crime, then the attorney-client privilege benefit is null and void. Of course, I'm sure you will allege that no crime was committed, or Corcoran didn't do anything wrong, or have some other excuse, but Trump would hardly be the first person this has ever happened to.

Yes.  I would not say that this happens often, but it is the primary exception to the attorney client privilege.   

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Name another person, especially a President who has had his ATTY/CLIENT privileges revoked in this country.  

That is easy, use Google.  But I will not take the time to do it for you until you post a fact demonstrating that Trump's constitutional rights to a fair trial are being ignored.   You have dodged that question and deflected to the attorney client privilege.   Rest assured that if the trial judge is determined by an appellate court to have inappropriately pierced Trump's attorney client privilege, then that evidence will be excluded or any conviction based upon that evidence will be overturned.   

The observation that Trump is losing in the preliminary court battles does not mean his rights are being trampled.  Unless you get your opinions from Truth Social I guess.     

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

My challenge for the resident Democrat Bureaucrat Ass Kisser was to challenge him to Name the person who has had their Atty/Client privilege removed.  I don't care about YOUR opinions that Donald Trump committed a crime or that his atty committed a crime. 

True that, but the judge's opinion, after considering the evidence, does matter.  Ouch.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

My challenge for the resident Democrat Bureaucrat Ass Kisser was to challenge him to Name the person who has had their Atty/Client privilege removed.  I don't care about YOUR opinions that Donald Trump committed a crime or that his atty committed a crime. 

Your statement there is so stupid on its face that it isn't even funny.  You claim that Donald Trump's atty
s committed a crime.  What crime was he found guilty of committing?  Name it

When was he found guilty in a court of law?  

Since he wasn't and never has been, let me just point out something about YOUR assertion above.  

It must be interesting in Your Totalitarian Legal world, where YOU get to decide BEFORE the fact that Donald Trump's atty has committed a crime and therefore his ATTY/CLIENT privilege is null and void.

Show me where that is in the US Constitution.  

Please do that.  Your statement above reeks of Stalinist Russia or Communist China where there is no due process, and the state can remove your rights anytime they want.

So now You subscribe to the totalitarian idea that a person is Guilty until Proven Innocent.

This is the James Lacey world of Totalitariian Radical Leftist rule of Law.  

Thanks for clarifying what I've known about radical leftists like Yourself and thanks for finally exposing Yourself and your totalitarian Leftist mindset.  

You don't believe in the Bill of Rights for all Americans.  That is pretty eye opening but then some of us knew that about You all along.  

Nice paranoid rant, give me one example of Trump being denied due process.  You swung and whiffed on this same question for the Jan 6 defendants.   You are such a fool.  Just because your political fellow travelers are losing their court cases does not mean that they are being denied due process.  It is far more likely that those who have lost are simply losing after being accorded due process and a fair trial because they are guilty.  Trump of course has not been tried yet, so your whining is a bit premature.  Still, he has been and still is being accorded due process.   

You will not have an example of Trump or a Jan 6 defendant being denied due process, so cue deflection in 5, 4, 3, 2....

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Name another person, especially a President who has had his ATTY/CLIENT privileges revoked in this country.  

Name that person. 

No one wants extra reading, but here is a law review article that seems to cover the basics.


https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3181&context=mlr

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Democrat ass kisser stated:

until you post a fact demonstrating thatTrump's constitutional rights to a fair trial are being ignored.

Simple, all the CRIMINAL Leaks by the DOJ to the NY Times and the WaPo that have occurred against Trump.  All the Grand Jury Leaks by the corrupt DOJ under the corrupt leadership of Merrick Garland, who is corrupt, biased, and despicable to the core.  Bought and paid for by Joe Biden's WH. He sure is paying back Joe Biden.

Funny how the Marxist Democrats all through the Trump administration made claims that Trump's AG would break the law FOR Trump, and yet as usual, THEY are the ones breaking the law over and over.  


Democrat Bureucrat ass kisser stated above:  Unless you get your opinions from Truth Social I guess. 

No, I get my information from Professor Emeritus of Constitutional Law at Harvard for 50 years, Alan Dershowitz:

https://www.ntd.com/dershowitz-condemns-release-of-georgia-grand-jury-materials-in-trump-election-case_902000.html


 But then being a Democrat bureaucrat ass kisser as you are, you obviously have no problem with one sided persecutions.  

And since there isn't anyone else on this forum who'll call you out for the tool of the left that you are, let me be the first to do so.  

No, I am a tool of justice.   Unlike you, I am watching the proceedings with interest and with no pre-conceived notion of Trump's guilt or innocence.   I've posted many times that he may beat these charges and thus be strengthened.  You on the other hand are blinded by hero-worship and there is nothing anyone can do to fix that!