Posts Made By: Steven Moore

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

which would include Rod Kaufman, James Lacey, and Brian McFarland, but Not James Brown (because I consider him neither crazy, nor stupid).

So here it is. 

A radio host I listen to, just made a good point.

Why is it that when it comes to abortion, leftists like all 3 above, will make the idiotic claim that Abortion is something that has to do with a woman's body, which of course is false, it has to do with a separate human being growing inside her body.

Therefore it isn't a situation of her body, her choice, it is a choice that she's making in most cases to kill a growing baby inside her body. 

That's one thing Her body, her choice.

Now then, if we have a situation in this nation, which we are supposed to have, that says that a person's relationship with his doctor is between he/her and his/her doctor and is only between his/her doctor then let's apply the abortion standard again.

We are told by abortion promoters that a choice of killing a baby inside her body should ONLY be between her and her doctor.

If that is the case that what goes on between a patient and the doctor should only be between the patient and doctor, then why does the standard above NOT apply when the doctor prescribes a drug to that patient? 

In other words what business is it of a third party like the 3 leftists above, to INTERFERE with the prescriptions between a doctor and patient?

Please explain, as to why the Doctor/patient confidentiality rule does NOT apply to that Doctor/patient when he prescribes an FDA approved drug to the patient?

This happens ALL The time with Doctors in this nation, that Doctors prescribe OFF USE drugs to patients.  

So then, Why is it YOUR business to INTERFERE with the Doctor and his patient in that instance?

Be specific. 

Lastly, applying the same abortion promoter's assertions that what goes on between an abortion doctor and his patient should be between ONLY the doctor and his patient when it comes to abortion.

Let's just take that same standard that leftists rely on, like the 3 leftists above, and ask the burning question.

Why then is it YOUR business that a person has been vaccinated when it should be between a doctor and his patient, and NONE Of YOUR business? 

If YOU are vaccinated, then why in Hell is it YOUR business whether or not someone else is vaccinated?

If YOU are vaccinated, you are supposed to NOT have to worry about getting the virus.

So what the hell do YOU care whether another is vaccinated?

Why doesn't the Doctor/patient Privilege apply to those who don't want to get the vaccination? 

If it is a personal thing with abortion that is allowing a woman to kill a growing human being in the womb, and it is none of my business according to you lefties, then why is it YOUR business when it comes to a person deciding whether or not to get a vaccine?

What business is that of yours?  Why does the same principle NOT apply?  

Go ahead and make your inconsistent case using your inconsistent logic. 

As it is often said, if liberals and leftists didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Their posts re: Ivermectin have been entertaining, laughably entertaining.....

Trying to take pot shots at it when its been used for treating humans for various things for 35 years or so with over 4 billion doses consumed. Not to mention in 2015 the two responsible for its development were awarded the Nobel prize for medicine.....Due honorable mention is the fact that Merck, the original patent holder has donated 3.7 million doses to developing nations.

I certainly make no claims about how effective or not it may be for Covid but claims that it is only for horses or that the human version is dangerous seem a bit ridiculous as long as it is prescribed by a physician.  

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James, Rod:

Understood.  Still, if the original Covid 19 virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology it is an enormously big deal.  The world wide death toll is 4,624,078 and counting.  And that does not include the uncounted dead in India, China and elsewhere.  You get my point I am sure.

Fauci has approached this topic and in particular any possible US support for Chinese research into bat-born corona viruses in a very political manner.  Whether the research was useful and typical, or whether it was beyond what is considered unreasonably dangerous are good questions to ask.  No reason to get hung up on whether the research meets the current or past definition of "gain of function."  Bottom line, this issue is not a couple of scientists "talking past each other."  This looks/sounds a lot more like a political dissembling.  I hope we get to the bottom of it eventually.

Jim

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

He wasn't tried in a court of law no matter how many times you say it.

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

Like I said, you rightie tightie guys just aren't funny.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

No, that joke Greg put up, was REALLY funny.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Hi Steve, and you captured their responses perfectly with the Seal of the Democrats that You put up.

One could insert any of their photos in the center and it would show the same crying view from them!  

Originally Posted by James Brown

I will not read or reply to any thread that calls me or any other forum member out by name in the title.  Only Richard does this.  It seems rude to me.  I encourage you all to join me.  Jim

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Why would you expect him to do that? He's a Republican...