Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

I know James, I know.  LOL!  

Pretty much every person who is on the right has watched for years, and has pointed out the fact that the left (for at least the last 2 decades, if not longer) has had an entitlement mentality whereby your side of the political aisle has lived under this weird assumption or supposition that you are free to dish out any pejoratives on the planet to describe those on the right, with complete impunity.

And of course when those of you get it back in your face, in spades, you become SO offended.  How DARE HE!   WE are the only ones permitted to hurl insults!   

Now, the sad thing in all this is that you and those like you James walk away when you hurl insults really believing you are justified in saying anything you like because well..... You're just entitled to do it because you're a liberal/leftist, and that's all the justification you and the rest need.  LOL

Don't worry, James Brown, the resident RINO here has your same mentality.  When he hurls insults its OK, because he's only hurling the insults towards the resident right winger.

Well the simple logical response to his excuse is to point out that I'm the only right winger who exists on this forum, so then whom else is he going to hurl insults at?  He surely wouldn't ever hurl an insult towards any of you, so since he only hurls his insults towards me, well we all need to understand that it is of course different when he does it.  His insults are Justified, don't you know?   

Now don't worry, I don't expect anything I've stated in this response to sink into your brain.  You and the rest have already made up your minds, that your insults are as I've stated so many times... DIFFERENT.     ROFL!  

Yes, yes James, it is different when YOU do it.  It is different when James Brown does it.  It is different when Jim M does it.  It is different when Brian M. does it.    

And one last thing, calling you a pussy or saying that you need vagisil isn't in any way, shape, or form Misogynistic. 

If you think it is, then you really are more brainwashed by the left than I even gave you credit for being.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

And I understand that you cannot justify Your liberal hypocrisy, but that's ok.  

It was a good time to point it out.    

Originally Posted by James Lacey

The free rent inside Rich's head, I presume?

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Do you want to discuss the double standard that exists on the left?  Do you want to deny it, like the rest of the leftists here?  

Yeah, I thought not.  Lightweight RINO.  

Originally Posted by Brian McFarland

I predict Trump will find some excuse to back out. Even if he doesn't, it won't be worth watching (presidential debates almost never are).

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Ultimately, of course, it depends upon what SCOTUS does and says about anything so you can save your righteous indignation. 
Not to mention the fact wherein conservative jurist hacks are routinely sought out by conservative interests in Texas in order to do their bidding. (I can cite numerous egregious examples to back up the latter).

A prime example among many equally egregious actions of SCOTUS:

Chief Justice ROBERTS on their Clarence Thomas penned idea of the 2nd amendment debacle in the lower courts who are being forced to apply whatever so-called standards for for gun related issues be decided upon those in existence in the 1700s. Sotomayor pointed out the confusion the other courts are having applying historical references to present day gun laws and the ROBERTS explanation is that those courts don't understand the conservative SCOTUS court's methodology in the application of gun laws and/or just about anything related to the 2nd amendment. ROBERTS stated those lower courts don't have to find a twin in history to apply their gun rulings to but, rather, they have to find an analogue! Talk about a distinction without a difference! And it couldn't be SCOTUS and their methodology that's at fault now could it?

Of course their methodology is never wrong except when they revisit the methodology behind Roe v Wade and THEN  the cons on the court have no problem overturning the methodology of a SCOTUS decision, now do they? And this nonsense about the states deciding is just that since Josh Hawley's wife can go running down to Texas to easily find a conservative jurist hack to decide an abortion issue and apply it to birth control pills or whatever they want to...

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Jamal Bowman, known for his denials of the Oct 7th atrocities committed by Palestinian terrorists, was trounced in the Democratic primary by a moderate Democrat while COLORADO Republicans elected Boebert the bimbo who ran on a platform exclaiming the 2020 election was stolen. 

Comments?...

Originally Posted by James Brown

Comments?  Yes, one can make himself look poorly informed by quoting only the national headlines.

I believe that of the 4 MAGA candidates running in Colorado, only one, Boebert, won.  Too bad it was not a clean sweep, but it is a fine start.   So at least in Colorado, the voters showed 75% of the extremists the door.   

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

" You falsely claim that the election was stolen with no evidence"

Is there something wrong in stating factually correct information?