Image of the day

Captured by
Philip Imbrogno

Pleiades M 45 with the Pleiades 68

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: James Brown

November 8, 2024 04:01 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Lacey


First, crime is already incredibly low. I know there has been a constant drumbeat in the right-wing press that crime is rampant, but all the available data tells a much different story.

Second, for Trump to lower energy costs by reducing the cost of gasoline by half, oil would have to go to at least $20/barrel and possibly lower. If oil went to $20/barrel, domestic oil and gas production would collapse and cease to exist. Companies could not profit at $20/barrel, and tens of thousands would become unemployed. We would soon become utterly dependent on oil imports alone. Doesn't that contradict another of Trump's promises to make us energy-independent? The economic damage done by energy costs being that low is incalculable. Trump has lied to you again. 

Third, no one wants to kill babies. I know that it is a common rumor, no outright lie, that Democrats want to kill babies, but it's simply not true. What many people do want is safe and legal abortion that is accessible when it's medically vital to the health care of a woman. But don't worry, under the current situation, those who want to keep killing women and forcing them to endure unimaginable and unnecessary pain and sorrow can continue to do so.

Fourth, I'm sure that Trump will use the power of the executive office to go on a revenge tour. Grievance, spite, and revenge are some of his core character traits, and if you are honest with yourself, we all know he has not changed. Heck, he tried to use the power of the executive office to ruin the Biden family already and got impeached for it. What makes you think he's not going to do it again? It seems to me to be incredibly naive to believe that Trump has suddenly become a good guy who is a President for all Americans. 


Lastly, I'm confident that Putin, Kim Jong Un, and Xi are all emboldened by Trump's election and that Ukraine will likely have to cede lots of territory to Russia. Trump deferred and praised all of these dictators during his first term, and nothing has happened to make us think he will do anything to try and deter them in his second term. Trump said on the campaign trail he would end the Ukraine war in 24 hours but has never provided any details regarding how that would work. Trump noted that Zelensky never should have started the war, even though Putin is the one who started it. Trump has called Zelensky a thief because every time he comes to Washington, he walks away with $100Bn. All available evidence points to Trump drying up military aid to Ukraine, which would cause them to have to surrender. I'm sorry, but Trump has lied to and misled you again.
Hi James:  In my opinion, you have diminished a thoughtful post by grossly mischaracterizing the motivation of pro-life citizens.  J

November 8, 2024 04:02 PM Forum: Politics

Elon Musk

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll
Compare what SpaceX has accomplished to the entire history of the US space program. There should be no doubt that a better way forward, and by a VERY wide margin, has emerged.

I'm not in a position to tell you Elon Musk gets most of the credit or little of the credit, but he gets the benefit of the doubt, at least from me. SpaceX is not a one-off for him, and he's succeeded where others have failed.

IF he can do to other parts of the Federal government what he has done to the space launch and EV industries, it would be transformational in a very positive way.

I get that he is a very controversial figure, and I don't like a lot of things about him, but his quirks could simply be the price of genius. Again, I'm in no position to label him a "genius" or not, but he gets the benefit of the doubt from me.
If Musk and others can somehow make the federal bureaucracy more efficient, it will be of huge benefit to the nation.

November 8, 2024 04:45 PM Forum: Politics

Some random thoughts

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll
People are not buying what Dems are selling. The GOP ran the trans surgery-in-prison ad 30,000 times for a reason. The Lincoln project pointed out in an ad they made that reassignment surgery was a policy under the Trump administration. Does ANYBODY believe it will be policy under the new Trump admin? No way, so pointing this fact out without denouncing it herself is meaningless. Tip of the iceberg.

Allowing minors access to drugs or surgery to alter their gender was also left unchallenged. Too woke to address it even if she agreed it shouldnt be allowed. I wrote a post warning about these issues during the election. Here was a post I made today. You want to know why you lost so many hispanic men? Here is one of the reasons:

"My Democratic friends, and yes I consider you friends: In the spirit of trying to learn from the electoral beat-down that the Democrats took in this election, let me re-echo something I tried to warn about before the election.

There is a huge difference between trying to protect the rights of people that hold minority beliefs or practices versus trying to impose societal norms against the desire of the majority. Its one of the bigger lessons from this election IMO, that I hope the left figures"
I've never had a Facebook account, but my wife does, and her feed of friends from high school though college and career is heavily skewed to the left.  The occasional righties keep a very low profile.  

I am really getting tired of our privileged, white, rich/middle class friends calling out the Trump voters because they think Trump is beyond the pale.  A college friend of ours posted a lengthy screed yesterday accusing all 70,000,000 Trump voters of xenophobia, racism, sexism, homo and transphobia, and greed!  This guy, who has never missed a meal in his life,  included a remarkably snotty comment in his screed dismissive of people who voted for Trump "because the price of bacon was too high."   

This sort of virtue signaling is nauseating.  Much of this forum despises Trump an appropriate amount, but I am pleased that no one has resorted to overtly blaming the Trump voters, especially those voters whom inflation hit the hardest.  

When thinking about the Trump voters, consider these shocking stats:   

"Trump won Latino men by 10 points, compared with a 23-point win for Biden and a 31-point win for Hillary Clinton among this group.

Latinas. They went +44 for Hillary Clinton, +39 for Biden—and just +24 for Harris.

Miami Dade County. Trump won here by 11 points, becoming the first Republican to win in this Latin American mecca—55 percent foreign born—since 1988.

Starr County, Texas. In the most Hispanic county in the United States, Trump won by 15 points after losing by 5 points in 2020 and 60 points in 2016."

https://www.city-journal.org/article/say-thats-quite-a-coalition-youve-got-there

"According to unofficial results from The Associated Press, Trump came within about 5 percentage points of winning New Jersey — a state that hasn’t backed a Republican presidential candidate since 1988.


In New York, which President Joe Biden won by 23 percentage points in 2020, Trump trailed Vice President Kamala Harris by about 12 percentage points.

Trump lagged about 5 percentage points behind Harris in Virginia, according to unofficial results. That’s a marked improvement over his 2020 performance, when he lost the commonwealth to Biden by a margin twice as big.

The outcome was similar in New Mexico, where Trump was on course to lose by less than 6 percentage points, according to unofficial results. In 2020, he lost New Mexico by more than 10 percentage points.

The 2024 Democratic ticket even underperformed when compared with Biden in Minnesota, the home of the party’s vice presidential nominee, Gov. Tim Walz, and in Harris’ own political base, California."

https://rollcall.com/2024/11/06/trump-surge-in-blue-states-added-to-dem-house-headwinds/

I want to be careful because racism, sexism, xenophobia and the like surely motivated some voters.  But I have faith in this country and our people and I myself am confident that Trump won because of economic and immigration policy plus, as Russ suggests, social overreach, plus lawfare backfire, and something we have not discussed much, censorship backfire.  One could argue the pandemic gave the Ds the White house in '20 and the pandemic took it away '24 because of inflation, government overreach, and censorship.

It is reasonable to ask if I have "called out" any of my socially conscious friends and acquaintances on my wife's Facebook?  You must be kidding!  I only share these thoughts with you all, my wife and a very few people in real life. 

The above only applies to swing voters of course.  What do I think of the huge majority of R's who fell in line and voted for Trump anyway?   More on that next.

November 8, 2024 05:15 PM Forum: Politics

Some random thoughts

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Brown

The above only applies to swing voters of course.  What so I think of the huge majority of R's who fell in line and voted for Trump anyway?   More on that next.
I am OK with the 65,000,000 or so Republicans who fell in line and voted for Trump anyway.   I did not vote for Trump, but I think I understand those who did, including the significant number of his voters who are middle class Republicans who were relatively less impacted by inflation.  I'm probably projecting a lot here, but what the hell.   Bottom line, I don't regret my vote for Harris, but I will still campaign for and vote for Nikki Haley if I get the chance, even though she supported Trump.  

1.  These republicans (me too) never believed that Trump is an existential threat to democracy.  Most probably think that Trump has horrible authoritarian proclivities, but trust our constitutional system to rein him in.  We could be wrong.  I don't believe we are.  So virtually no one voted for fascism, no matter what MSNBC might say.

1A.  The Democrats have proved themselves to be incredibly authoritarian too.   Dissenting voices on climate change, social issues, the pandemic, and other topics are not rebutted, instead contrary opinions are vilified.  I read a lot of Matt Taibbi over the past two years, and I agree with him that the Biden administration has stepped way over the censorship line under the guise of curbing "misinformation."  R voters have not forgotten the big Russian Collusion lie and this and many other things completely dilute the D argument that Trump is a uniquely dangerous authoritarian.

2.  The rank and file Trump republicans honestly prefer R policies, and therefore trust Trump with the economy and border far more than they trusted Harris.

3.   I think most view J6 as a riot, and not an insurrection.   A huge stain on Trump and the party, but a huge stain that did not justify the D reaction.

4.  I think most feel the lawfare, especially the criminal prosecutions of Trump, were entirely politically motivated.   Therefore, I expect most R voters see nothing but hypocrisy when the D's campaign on the threat of Trump "weaponizing the DOJ."

5.  Bottom line, I believe the vast majority of Rs who voted for Trump did so knowing that he is a cad, a buffoon, a narcissist and certainly a misogynist.   But they voted for him and the Republican party because they think R governance is best for the country.  Not because they are closeted racists, misogynists, or haters of any sort.

November 8, 2024 05:26 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Really, by stating reality?
Yeah sure, Rod.  The pro life crown is motivated by a desire "to keep killing women and forcing them to endure unimaginable and unnecessary pain and sorrow" just like the pro choice crowd is motivated by a desire "to kill babies."

November 8, 2024 05:29 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Brian McFarland

I think you missed the point.  I read it as a response in kind to this: "For those who killing babies was an issue, you will continue to be able to kill babies."
Upon reflection, you are probably right.  The rest of James' reply was a reasoned, level headed and articulate rebuttal, not any sort of  "response in kind."   So, if he chose to inject sarcasm of snark at this point in his reply, I did indeed misread it.   James will let us know at some point.

November 8, 2024 05:31 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Lacey


Chris grossly mischaracterized the motivations of pro-choice citizens, so I was returning the favor in kind to make a point.
Roger.

November 8, 2024 05:37 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

No, but that's the outcome of the so-called pro life conservative agenda.
Yes, and if one believes the spark of humanity is bestowed by God at conception, the outcome of an abortion at any stage is the killing of a baby.   

Do you know anyone in your circle of friends and colleagues who believes that humanity begins at conception?  I know lots of good and sincere people who have this view.   Many are cautiously pro-choice as a matter of law and political compromise, I am myself.  That compromise does not diminish the fact that these people sincerely and honestly believe that abortion at any stage kills a baby.

November 8, 2024 05:40 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Lacey


Chris grossly mischaracterized the motivations of pro-choice citizens, so I was returning the favor in kind to make a point. My apologies if it offended you; that was not my intent. I have great respect for you.
No offense was taken!  Thanks though.  I simply missed the sarcasm in context and it seemed beneath you.

I am indeed frustrated that Rod can not appreciate that many pro-life advocates have sincere motivations that have nothing to do with dominating or hurting women.

November 8, 2024 05:51 PM Forum: Politics

not gloating here

Posted By James Brown

Originally Posted by James Brown

Yes, and if one believes the spark of humanity is bestowed by God at conception, the outcome of an abortion at any stage is the killing of a baby.   

Do you know anyone in your circle of friends and colleagues who believes that humanity begins at conception?  I know lots of good and sincere people who have this view.   Many are cautiously pro-choice as a matter of law and political compromise, I am myself.  That compromise does not diminish the fact that these people sincerely and honestly believe that abortion at any stage kills a baby.
I ought to elaborate (reiterate, we have discussed this many times), that I see the issue of abortion as a human rights issue. 

The key question is "when in the arc between conception and birth do human rights attach to the developing embryo/fetus."  At the point in time human rights, including the right to life, attach to the developing embryo/fetus it should be illegal to kill him or her, unless necessary to save the mother.  She has the right to life too.  Plus a right to self defense.

Obviously this is not a dispositive observation, because the conclusion of when do human rights attach to the embryo/fetus is highly subjective, philosophical, religious, or even arbitrary.

Because the underlying question has an infinite number of legitimate answers, compromise is mandated.  I favor the Roe-type compromise where abortion is permitted freely early on in pregnancy and regulated and then prohibited later.

But, I get really frustrated when the viewpoints of people who sincerely believe human rights are granted by God at conception are dismissed out of hand as irrelevant, or evilly motivated.

As should be obvious from my many posts this morning and over the last few days, I think this country would be a lot better off if we took the time to try to understand the folks who disagree with us, rather than vilifying them.