Originally Posted by James Lacey
The fight over RBG's replacement has invigorated both sides, but so far, it's looking like Democrats benefit more than Republicans as far as fundraising goes. The Democrats will use that money not only to oppose replacing RBG before the election but also to try and turn the tide in other pivotal elections in 2020. If the Democrats had taken control of the Senate in 2018, we would, of course, see a completely different dynamic playing out.
While I would prefer a Biden nominee over a Trump nominee, and I will vote blue to try and make that happen, most studies show the court remains remarkably centered regardless of who is appointed. I think once freed of the necessity of caring about politics, most judges find themselves leaning left or drifting centrist. For example, so far, Gorsuch has been moving to the center. There are exceptions and extremes, such as Douglas or Thomas. But overall, the court stays remarkably center regardless of who is appointed.
It seems inevitable that progressives will lose some battles, they would not have otherwise if Trump gets to name the nominee. I think, for example, the PPACA is under more threat now. But political power is not only wielded in choosing of the Supreme Court. There are other battles to win elsewhere, more easily won, once Democrats regain control.
"Extreme" is putting it mildly in reference to Thomas. What was it, just a few years ago, when he had his own wife interview him for some sort of conservative outlet. Completely inappropriate, to say the least, for a sitting supreme court justice. With him, you don't have a justice on the court, you have a conservative advocate. As I've stated in the past, I don't believe he needs to show up to a hearing. If he does, he doesn't even ask a question. He can phone, text, fax, and or email his "decision" because everybody already knows what it is; there's no mystery about it. His decisions are already stamped on his forehead...