Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Dual Clusters near Antares

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Mollise

October 29, 2009 12:11 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Looking to trade 8" and 11" Nextstars!

Posted By Rod Mollise

Dan Starr said:

smile

Hey folks myself and another member here are looking to trade Nextstars. I was wondering if anyone can confirm that we wouldn't need to worry about shipping the tripods or wedges. Both wedges are the Celestron heavy duty one and on the Celestron website it lists the heavy duty wedge for use for both...nothing about the tripod there though that I could find.

Bummer we live more than a few hours apart but we are working on a face to face exchange too though...

Thanks in advance for the assistance!

Dan

edit...yes they are both GPS models by the way!

wink

The wedges are interchageable.

October 29, 2009 12:12 PM Forum: Reflectors

CPC800 vs LX90ACF

Posted By Rod Mollise

Walter Schmitt said:

Both scopes cost $2000. What are the relative strenghts and weaknesses? Walter

They are quite comparable. I prefer the CPC HC for sure. Please be aware the newer LX90s have suffered from drive problems since the move of production to Mexico. Have these problems been fixed? I don't know...I'd check the LX90 Yahoogroup.

October 31, 2009 01:46 PM Forum: Ham and Shortwave Radio

Sangean PR-D5

Posted By Rod Mollise

I've been told those are very good receivers. Last time I wanted an am/fm, what I could find in town (at Bestbuy) was a little Boston Acoustic receiver. I continue to be amazed at the quantity and quality of sound that little thing puts out.

November 3, 2009 12:00 PM Forum: Eyepieces

TMB 100

Posted By Rod Mollise

Walter Schmitt said:

Another 100° eyepiece is coming for $299.
Has anyone seen a review?


There was an indoor test posted briefly on CN of the Zhumel-badged version (same as the TMB). Unfortunately, the author deleted his post for some reason before I could look at it and the "moderator" locked the thread after that (for no good reason I could see). Be that as it may, the one comment that referenced the findings referred to "90% of the performance;" make of that what you will.

November 4, 2009 10:48 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Scope downsize

Posted By Rod Mollise

Tom Mengel said:

Hi all,

I’m finding myself in a (unfortunately) common situation of a “early forced retirement” while my wife is preparing for grad school. The bottom line is my well loved (and used) LX-10 is way to large for my projected future life style (and in truth it was getting to be a pain to set up anyway). So now I’m in the process of “trading down” to a smaller scope that must be able to hibernate in a closet corner in what may end up as compact student housing for the next few years.

I don’t want to rekindle the seeming never ending “Cats vs. Refractors” or “DOBs vs. Cats” threads but would like some feedback on small footprint scopes that involve minimal setup efforts. What I want is at least a 5 inch aperture and easy to carry (possible down stirs) to transport to a dark site. Area contenders range from USC in LA (not renown for dark skies) to Cornell in Ithaca NY (small town in the mountains – probably OK skies).

Right now I’m leaning towards trading “even” for something down the lines of a Celestron G5 on a EQ 3 mount. GOTO is nice but not requirement, just want a utilitarian setup that works well. Figure an older LX-10 with a adjustable field tripod and Magellan I DSC would be a fair dinkum trade for a newer, smaller setup.

Your thoughts?


If you were talking a 12-inch Dobsonian, it might be different. Frankly, an LX10 is not much larger nor does it take up much more room than what you are proposing (you don't have to keep it in a case, etc., you know).

You won't like going from 8 to 5-inches if you are a reasonably serious observer. Casual observer who likes to peep at the Moon once in a while? A C5 is fine. I do suggest you get the OMNI XLT, as the EQ3 is really insufficient for the scope to really shine.

Again, not much space saving with either, though.

November 5, 2009 12:28 PM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

Does an Ethos EP enhance galaxy details?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Mike Alexander said:

For those of you who either own or have evaluated Ethos eyepieces, all other factors the same: telescope, observation sight and time etc - have you found that using an ethos eyepiece enhances the view of details in galaxies?

Thanks.......Mike

Yes. The contrast and sharpness of these eyepieces is remarkable.

November 6, 2009 03:54 PM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

REVISED question on Ethos EP & galaxy details

Posted By Rod Mollise

Mike Alexander said:

Hi folks,

Please allow me to rephrase my original question:

I currently have a 12 inch f/10 Meade LX90.

I have been using University Optics HD orthoscopic EP's for viewing details in galaxies. I use either a 9,12 or 18 mm ortho EP, depending on the galaxy size.

That said, in your opinion would using an Ethos EP enhance the view of galaxy details vs the orthos?


Clear skies......Mike

Yes. Not that the UOs are not good eyepieces.

November 11, 2009 12:41 PM Forum: Politics

Hey Vets...

Posted By Rod Mollise

Mike Strieber said:

Thanks! wink
Mike

You're welcome (typed from work where I spend EVERY Veterans' Day LOL)...!

November 16, 2009 03:18 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Question on Celestron Ultima 8

Posted By Rod Mollise

Are you sure the screws in question really are ones that attach the rear cell assembly to the tube? I'd doubt that. Typically finders/dovetails, etc. are attached to the rear cell and corrector assembly by pairs of "Accessory Screws." If that is the case, there is nothing to fear. Might have a local C8 toting club member have a look at your scope.

November 20, 2009 12:05 PM Forum: Religion

"cosmology and ...................."(YES religion)

Posted By Rod Mollise

refet dehari said:

Not this time cause but next time I’m beck in this forum I’ll share some verses or hadiths that names deferent places on universe with different names and the hadith describing the deference’s on the size ,for instance first layer of heaven decorated with stars
And there is place is called Qursijj witch is bigger than 7 layers of heavens.
Then there is a space is called Arsh (throne) on this one is bigger than kursijj
It shows us that God created anything but he is not inside of his creation.
we have hadiths about begining of creation.

And _I_ say there is a unicorn in my garden eating lilies. What evidence do you have for these things besides the stories in your sacred book?