Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Dual Clusters near Antares

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

October 30, 2018 08:32 AM Forum: Eyepieces

RKE "Floating in Space" Effect

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Kenzie Young
Is the 28mm Edmund Scientific RKE the only one in the series to demonstrate the legendary "floating in space" effect? How about the 21mm? Are there other eyepieces that display this?
While the 28mm RKE is reputed to have this effect, it also prone to blackouts. I doubt that the others in the series will provide the effect you're describing. 
The larger, heavier and more expensive naglers and ES series will also provide a similar effect. I think you'll enjoy using an RKE 28mm once you get used to it and find the sweet spot in positioning your head to avoid blackouts seen in this and other longer focal eyepieces with large exit pupils and eye relief.

April 10, 2020 04:17 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Clave Eyepieces - Vintages, Specifications, & Differences?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Discussion on Clave eyepieces/asdapters:
http://www.science-bbs.com/17-astro-amateur/447329fa1f428885.htm
and:
http://www.science-bbs.com/17-astro-amateur/6292fe7b029af9ea.htm
Hope this helps.

April 14, 2020 09:55 AM Forum: Eyepieces

What to buy next?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Wayne Yaskew
I have a 2" diagonal on my CPC 925. I have 2 Baader Morpheus eyepieces (12.5 & 17 both with 1.25 barrel) I have one low-end ocular that came with the scope (40mm Plossl) I own 1 Televue; (Panoptic 41mm) and I want to add one more good eyepiece in the $500-$600 maximum range. I see Ethos 21mm going used in the neighborhood. I of course want to go 2" 

What is the one eyepiece I should own (my preference being deep sky objects) and I am not into photography of any type.

Suggestions?

W
The 21mm Ethos is a good choice but I'd opt for a 31mm nagler for DSOs with your scope. They're pricey new but can be had for a lot less used. Just my 2 cents on this one.

April 21, 2020 01:03 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Best choice in Tele Vue Delos?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Wayne Yaskew

Hey John,
I am in a fairly small community and it’s virtually impossible for me to try out different eye pieces before I buy.
In fact my dealer is 800 miles away in Alberta. I’m just trying to get opinions from other enthusiasts as to what’s the best pick for me might be taking into account what I already have in my collection.
I’ve been told the low power I pieces play eyepieces, say 7mm or even 9mm will just result into much blur taking into account by scope (C925) and conditions.

I’d like to fill the gap between 21 and 31. What would you suggest? I’m OK with the cost of say a Tele Vue. I just don’t want to pick the wrong one or a redundant one
Why don't consider utilizing a celestron F6.3 focal reducer? That'll give you  a wider ranges of uses with the eyepieces you already have and will likely cost a lot less than buying a new premium eyepiece. The reducer will give you an apparent wider/brighter FOV and can help optimize your scope for extended objects like large nebulae.  

April 24, 2020 06:43 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Filter Reviews

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Vladimir Portyanko
Here is a good recommendation from Don Pensack (post #3)

http://www.deepskyforum.com/showthread.php?1081-Filters-and-band-pass-scanning

You also may want to download his 2019 Nebula Filters Buyer's Guide unless you've got it already

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/655490-2019-nebula-filters-buyers-guide/

And specifically on Svbony OIII more details here

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/666442-svbony-oiii/

 
Vladimir, thanks, I have seen the links. 

April 20, 2020 02:27 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Filter Reviews

Posted By Rod Kaufman

I've been following a thread on an 0111 filter on that other website but when I've tried to login, it's a no go and I'm awaiting an email from their administrator so I can do so. My personal observing experience has been with 0111 filters from celestron(Baader), Thousand Oaks Optical, Zhumell, Orion, generic Chinese equivalent, and Lumicon. The Lumicon is optimum for viewing compared to the others, by far, and I'd highly recommend it as long as you can afford it. The others do work in varying degrees but are less effective in enhancing the views of responsive objects. In meantime, I did find a review of the Svbony UHC filter, including spectral analysis:
https://star-hunter.ru/en/svbony-uhc-review/
The latter is an inexpensive filter generally available on Amazon.

April 21, 2020 01:41 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Cool Filter Performance Tool!

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Check this out:
https://searchlight.semrock.com/?sid=a08a1af9-84ee-49d2-959d-153d7e7c0eb8
You click on the filter name on the right side of the screen and it's spectral characteristics instantly appear!

April 18, 2021 02:32 AM Forum: Eyepieces

Explorer scientific - difference between early vs late version of the 82 degree eyepieces

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by tom sweet
Hello,

Can anyone tell me the difference between the early and late version of the explorer scientific 82 eyepieces?  Also how can you tell the difference by looking at them?  I appreciate any help you can provide as I’m looking at buying some used eyepieces.

Thanks, Tom
Depending on the focal length their may be discernible physical differences. Some may be nitrogen purged while others are argon purged to prevent moisture and fogging. Both will generally work quite well. Here's a comparo of the 30mm version by an experienced Russian amateur/vendor:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=https://star-hunter.ru/en/&rev=search&to=aue
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=https://star-hunter.ru/en/&rev=search&to=aue
There is also the MAX vision line which are the same thing as the newer versions but without the gas purging and sell for less from an overseas supplier, Aliexpress.

September 29, 2022 03:57 AM Forum: Eyepieces

UWAN 16mm is only 14mm

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Henrik Bjørslev Andersen
Hello, recently I made some comparisons of various EPs in my binoviewer and found out that TS UWAN 16mm is not 16mm at all!! It's exactly 14mm, I can place an ES14 in one side and a TS UWAN 16mm in the other side and get a sharp image, they give exactly the same enlargement. The UWAN has a slightly wider field though. I find it amazing that such an eyepiece can be manufactured for years with so misleading specs, why hasn't it been changed? Many people must have detected that before me!

Now I wonder, if UWANs from other manufacturers than TS Optics have the same problem? Nirvana, Lacerta and others look exactly the same, I suppose they are identical, just with different brand names. But the UWANs from Williams Optics look different. Does anyone have experience with these, are they any better than TS UWANs, which have a tendency for blackouts, if you want to see the complete field, and are they actually 16mm or 14mm as the others?

Thanks for your time,
Henrik.
Well, there's more than one ES 14mm model available: the ES 14mm 82AFOV and the ES 14mm 100AFOV. I have the latter and not the former and I guess the 82AFOV is what you're referring to in your post. I suspect the ES eyepieces have the correct focal lengths while the 16mm is off but it's not too surprising to me since I've seen focal lengths misstated before, especially in zoom eyepieces.

December 1, 2023 10:39 PM Forum: Eyepieces

Ethos Focal Length Groups of Three

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Erwin
Why are Tele Vue Ethos eyepieces often recommended in groups of three focal lengths:

21mm, 13mm and 8mm

or

17mm, 10 and 6 mm?
Depends on your scope but of the two groups I'd go with the 17, 10 and 6mm because the 21mm weighs a ton and may cause balance issues and the 10mm tests much better optically on the bench tests than the 13mm.