Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Brown

"The Times' sources stressed that though Trump had asked about the plan, he did not seem to entertain it seriously."

Hi Russ:

You've questioned several times whether I take the threat posed by Trump seriously enough.  On the contrary, I've often wondered why you seem to buy into the more outrageous and fantastic tales about Trump and his strategies, especially when the tales are foisted upon the public by Trump's enemies in the press and contradicted in the very articles pushing them. 

We agree that the US is better off with Trump out of the Oval Office.  We disagree completely on whether he is a threat to the United States.

Jim

Originally Posted by James Brown

Trump is sure as hell being petty about the transition, but it is going to happen whether he likes it or not.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-al-gore-elections-b622c6d946d320508a4d6756fb279b93

Jim

Originally Posted by James Lacey

Trump is going to leave. The only question that remains is how much damage will he do on the way out.

• Wisconsin finished its canvasses for its audit of the vote. The result? Biden gained 10 votes and Trump lost 271.
• The Secretary of State of Michigan issued this response to false reports about the Dominion voting system:

         https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127--544676--,00.html

         False claims from Ronna McDaniel have no merit

         The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses.

• Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees:

        https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election

        There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

"It is generally considered the norm for Supreme Court justices and federal judges to refrain from commenting on politically partisan issues, with many believing that the legal professionals have a responsibility to be fair adjudicators of the law, rather than political advocates."
Sammy and Clarence need a refresher class on jurisprudence and ethics...
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/525936-elizabeth-warren-slams-justice-alito-over-nakedly-partisan-speech