Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Let me just address your response this way. I realize that you're able to easily con others here, because they like you haven't an ounce of honesty or more importantly integrity in their character makeup just like you haven't in yours, but that is to be expected.
Like all liberals you've gone your entire life feeling entitled to misrepresent your notions and your assertions.
Now here you're going to put qualifiers on your "
digs" as
not being gratuitous? Pretty funny I have to say.
I suppose your myriads of comments, suggesting I'm "i
n my mother's basement typing", was not gratuitous?
If that is your suggestion, then excuse me while I roll on the floor laughing myself into a fit of hysterics.
You know, at this point in the game, it is really amazing that you would even suggest that you don't make gratuitous digs at me?
I mean to say, you don't even have the balls to admit your actions.
Personally, I'm happy to say that I give you and the rest here gratuitous digs all the time.
You might want to grow a pair and man up to your statements, but then that is how all liberals operate now isn't it, as the intellectually dishonest cowards that they are.
It appears that you are just one more boring example of that.
Occasionally my kinder and gentler digs might be gratuitous. This is of course why I used the word "typically" in my original post, the post that upset you so much. I suppose I have posted that you were typing away in your mother's basement without you actually asking for it. We were not talking about those sort of gentle digs, though, were we?
Overall, I would bet good money the vast majority of my digs at you are in response to something embarrassing or vile you have posted, and I would not define these responsive digs as "gratuitous". Your definition of gratuitous may differ of course. To me, a gratuitous dig is one tossed in for no particular reason. A non-gratuitous dig is one I post
in reply to something vile or embarrassing posted by you.
All of the times I have called you a "homophobe" or "misogynist" it has been in response to you posting something I deem homophobic or misogynistic. By "all" I mean each and every time. I have never called you a homophobe, a misogynist, a racist, or a xenophobe without it being in response to something you posted. Never.
Speaking of my original post, you replied already on Friday, which led to several related replies on your part. Now on Sunday, you are replying again, with some different arguments. I apologize for upsetting you so much. I hope you can get my post out of your head soon!
Were those last two comment gratuitous, or even a dig? We'll have to let the readers decide for themselves. J
