Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by David Cotterell

I found this anonymously written piece which sums up why bringing up the BLM/Antifa riots as some sort of weird defense of the MAGA rioters is a false equivalency.

"You need to stop with the BLM/MAGAt false equivalence.

Make no mistake, the BLM folks shouldn't have destroyed property--that's wrong. And you'll find precious few defending it; and when they do it's a "Well, it was wrong but I understand why" kind of defense.

BLM: Has a legitimate grievance, whose actual existence is trivially proven. To wit: Whole lotta black people getting shot with very little provocation, and a whole lot of white people getting away with the same thing but not getting shot. In response to their voices not being heard, they burned down a donut shop or two and a police station. In response the government sent out paramilitary/LE folks with no identification to scoop them into vans.

MAGAts: Do not have a legitimate grievance. There is exactly zero evidence of large-scale voter fraud. To date, they have had over 60 cases laughed out of court. Not one of those cases presented evidence other than "I heard something might have happened," "I don't understand Benford's Law," "I watched them count the votes and people were mean to me," "I was confused that so many of the mail in ballots, which Trump said were bad, were for Democrats." After numerous recounts (hand and machine) and audits with signature matching, all we got was even more votes for Biden, plus three dudes in PA who tried to use the identities of dead people to vote...for Trump. The states all certified their results, and according to the Constitution, which MAGAts like to masturbate to (although just the Second Amendment, and not the bit about the regulated militias), that was the end of it. Way more electoral and popular votes for Biden. Recounted, audited, and proved. End of story. But MAGAts' orange god told them they would win, and so they threw a gigantic tantrum and stormed a building which, until now most people assumed was the sort of place that if you stormed it you would be shot, and the cops let them right on in. They went it with an obvious motive to put an end to a constitutionally-prescribed process that ensure orderly transition of government, and given their stash of zip ties, were hell bent on kidnapping folks.  Good jerb, MAGAts.

So BLM broke the law and upset civil order because they were upset at time after time being patted on the head and told their very real grievances aren't important. MAGAts breached the heart of US government and attempted to overthrow it, because they were sad that they lost. This is sedition. BLM is mad that the laws are not being applied fairly to them, MAGAts are mad because laws are being applied fairly.


Dave

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

No thats the bullshit.....he did not call for violence....He urged them to be peaceful.....accusing him of doing what the left has done countless times wont make it true lol

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I hadn't heard this, yet. Like I said, they don't even want the possibility of getting sued. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Indicate how he "persuaded" anyone to incite a riot.

When did he say "go down there and invade the Capitol, break down doors, and start a riot"?

When did he even come close to any language like that?

Perhaps you dreamed it when you were going through your daily delusion!  LOL