Image of the day

Captured by
Gerald Elkin

House Finch

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Mollise

May 13, 2010 12:47 PM Forum: Religion

Hmm, and I though it was the Religion forum.

Posted By Rod Mollise

Floyd Blue said:

The thing that I do not understand is this. Why is this forum here, it is just a place for people to ridicule others that are Religious or only for the debunking of Religion? Where is the ability for believers to discuss Religion in a forum dedicated to the topic?

It is here for the OPEN DISCUSSION of religious topics. Which does not mean "anything claimed by religion is accepted at face value." It is OPEN to dicussion.

May 15, 2010 11:00 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

HELP Meade SCT assembly question

Posted By Rod Mollise

Charles Littell said:

Hi folks: I have become an expert at assembling and disassembling my 8" Meade SCT (model 2080 oldie but goodie), along with associated skills such as cleaning optics, replacing grease, losing and finding little parts in the carpet, etc. But for all this, I still have more focus-driven image shift than I think is reasonable (about 10% of FOV in my 26mm EP.)

It is a LOT better since I tightened the primary mount (dried/shrunk cork ring.) But I am now contemplating the remaining possible sources of shift. Could it be the mount of the center tube to the rear frame? Searching the web, I find no reference to how this tube is attached to the frame. It looks like it MIGHT just be threaded and spun in, but I don't see any set screws as would be expected.

Does anyone have experience with this? Is the center tube removable?

Thanks-=-Chas in Dayton

By "center tube to frame," you mean "baffle tube to rear cell"? If so, likely not...it would have to be way off true.

May 23, 2010 02:20 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Reducing vibration in fork mounts

Posted By Rod Mollise

Paul Ste. Marie said:

Has anyone had success trying to dampen vibration in fork mounts by adding some sort of non-elastic (in the technical sense) material to the fork? I'm thinking of trying some of the squirt-in expanding foam in the channels of the fork on my LX50 to absorb and deaden vibrations.

I figure anything adequately mushy should reduce the tuning fork effect I seem to get whenever I touch the scope to focus.

Depends. Is your scope on a wedge? That is the usual source of a large part of the vibrations. Answer? Get (or build) a heftier wedge. If you are in alt-az, look to the tripod; there are various things that can improve that, including Celestron's vibration reduction pads (which will also help a wedge-mount scope).

May 23, 2010 02:22 PM Forum: Solar System Observing

Sunspots

Posted By Rod Mollise

Michael Greenham said:

There's a nice grouping today with one of the biggest spots I've seen yet. 8) If you've got a sun filter then get out and take a look and get a tan at the same time.

Cheers,
Mike

Yep...just got done looking at it. A Bunch, with some nice detail in my 80mm f/11 refractor and Thousand Oaks filter.

Sol: keep 'em comin, buddy! LOL!

May 28, 2010 08:53 PM Forum: Religion

Re: What evidence would make you believe?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Scott Satko said:

Rod, thanks for your opinion. I was hoping for something a little more specific, though. Tell me what your ideas are for the design of a specific experiment that would prove the hypothesis that we're discussing. The problem with using vague terms is that even if such an experiment could be done, there would always be naysayers who would say "that doesn't count," and would claim that they disagreed with the conclusions of the experiment.

It is not up to me to design an experiment in hopes of supporting these ridiculous claims. That is the province of those who posit the existance of a supernatural being. I wouldn't waste my time worrying about something that is nonsensical on the face of it.

The place to look for gods and goddesses is not "out there," but "in here," in the human heart. Gods and goddesses clearly have no physical reality at all...but they do have psychological reality and they COULD be a force for good if their believers would let them be.

May 29, 2010 12:08 PM Forum: Off Topic Discussions

Science Question: What's In the Rain?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Lee Spain said:

If Gulf Coast towns get an insane amount of rain each year (65-75 inches or so) and there is a huge oil slick off of the coast. What's going to be in all that rain? 8O Is it going to be full of oil and petrochemicals? 8O shocked

Not likely. While some of the more volatile substances may become involved in rain, I doubt to any great extent the way the scenario is playin' out now. Believe you me, it's not rain we are worried about. sad

June 1, 2010 11:28 PM Forum: ASTRONOMY

Lens cleaning

Posted By Rod Mollise

Craig M Carl said:

Hey guys, the newby is back. I've got a question about the best way to go about cleaning a corrector lens on an SCT. Got any suggestions?
Products, methods, do's and don'ts.


Rule number one? DON'T. SCT correctors are quite tough compared to mirrors, but you still don't want to be cleanin' 'em because there are dust specks on 'em!

If you must clean, what I've used over the last 30+ years is original Blue Windex and original white Kleenex (NO LOTION).

Dust the corrector with either canned air, like you'd buy in a camera store to clean lenses with, or a clean camel's hair brush. Spray Windex on the tissue NOT on the corrector. Swab from secondary holder outward, changing tissues frequently. When done, brush or blow away any lint left by the Kleenex.

But, again, don't do this because you noticed some dust motes when you shined a bright flashlight on the dadgummed corrector. wink

June 2, 2010 12:02 PM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

Her M83 from a "His and Hers" Session

Posted By Rod Mollise

Roland Beard said:

With my wife's permission I have posted her quick sketch of M83. We had opportunity in early May to go after M83 and M68 together using a C8 with astro video equipment. It makes for an interesting time as we huddle around a monitor. She is much faster than me and whipped this out in half the time it took me. Then we went to M68. Hope someone enjoys it. This sketch is from a story and 3 sketches on our Inspiration pages at a little ministry site (address under my signature in case you want to go look).

Very nice indeed.

June 3, 2010 09:10 PM Forum: ASTRONOMY

Focal reducers

Posted By Rod Mollise

robin woolsey said:

Hello! I am considering the purchase of a focal reducer for my C8 Celestron to improve the image quality and for astrophotography. Am I headed in the right direction and does brand name matter?
robin

Yes, it matters. Stick with the Celestron f/6.3 reducer/corrector. The Meade has problems backfocus-wise, and other similar units may as well.

June 5, 2010 12:32 PM Forum: Guns and Hunting Optics

Armed while observing at dark sites

Posted By Rod Mollise

Louis Busby said:

Anyone here take telescope protection while observing at dark sites.

I live in Northern VA and have to go to remote dark sites to observe/image. I usually always have a pistol with me since I am out in the dark alone with thousands of dollars worth of equipment. I have a concealed carry permit and usually wear the pistol concealed. Also in some areas I go there are bears

The exception to that is if I am at a star party with lots of kids. I lock the pistol in the truck just to be safe and to keep the little ones from freaking if they spot it accidently.

Jus wonderin.

I used to carry a piece with me into the boonies...even just my little bitty (but sweet) Walther PPK. I stopped doing that, though. I finally decided that if I was so nervous about a site--for whatever reason--that I needed to be armed, I would NOT get any productive observing done. If, at every snapped twig, I pulled away from the eyepiece and prepared for COMBAT. LOL.

My solution? I don't observe alone and I always take a cellphone. You might say you want to be armed even in that case, and that's OK. I find that armed or not, when I'm with my friends I _feel_ safe and get lots of work done.

That's the other part of the equation. Choose as secure a site as possible--don't set up at the side of the road or in rest stops. I never had a problem out in the dark, and I doubt I ever will. If anybody happened along, it was usually an LEO. The thing, really, is not being safe, but FEELING safe so I can observe comfortably, and I find buddies and a cellphone do that rather than a piece.