Originally Posted by Mel Maki
This should be cut and dried. No action about him having relations with somebody underage a year ago?
Everybody should be more skeptical about, "...a person familiar with the..."
Seems if Carlson was pissed he will likely say something on today's program. He is a, "in your face type" of person.
This should be cut and dried. Everybody should be skeptical comments from a Melvin.
"No action about him having relations with somebody underage a year ago?" Er, ah, investigations of members of congress take time and considering it evolved in the waning days of the last administration, it certainly isn't unreasonable to understand why time as elapsed for the investigation to proceed, unless, of course, you happen to be a Melvin.
I rarely believe anything a Fox propagandist like Carlson says so I don't care or expect him to say he was "pissed" about it on his show tonight.
So, the bottom line is I'd much rather rely on the comments from "a person familiar with the" than those typed by a Melvin. And, in other similar situations, the comments from uncited sources, a common journalistic practice to protect anonymity, have usually proven to be correct...