HuntingPosted By Rod Kaufman |
You never fail to recognize reality do you Greg?...Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer
You never fail to rise to the bait do you Rod?
HuntingPosted By Rod Kaufman |
I have my doubts about its "necessity". These doves reportedly produce more eggs and therefore offspring than their counterparts elsewhere in the world. If that's the case, then nature intended it to be that way for good reasons other than becoming mass casualties for voracious "hunters". Surely there are other ways of protecting the crops of an indigenous rancher. A couple of trained dogs working the fields scaring off the birds and/or noise makers and the like could probably serve as deterrents. I suspect the only thing that hasn't forced these doves to near extinction at this point is the safety and distance from the relative few who travel there to kill them for the pure enjoyment of doing so and not because they want to protect the crops of the locals...Originally Posted by James Brown
After some research, I see that my first off-the-cuff impression was off. Mass dove shooting in Argentina is quite possibly necessary, environmentally beneficial and environmentally sustainable. No less ethical than the alternative, which is wholesale poisoning. This is not at all like "shooting a baboon just to see what it felt like to kill a stranger."
So, even though I would not participate and I doubt that this activity would be interesting to the hunters I know, I will withdraw my "sicko" characterization. Jim
HuntingPosted By Rod Kaufman |
Probably not any happier than the villagers whose "problem" elephant was killed but was really any elephant the trophy hunter happened upon and shot...Originally Posted by Steven Moore
Rod you should travel down there and tell them what they should do about all these doves and how to protect the crops if you are so worried about all this. I am sure they would be happy to hear from you!
HuntingPosted By Rod Kaufman |
First The Senate Minority Leader, Now The House Minority LeaderPosted By Rod Kaufman |
11Posted By Rod Kaufman |
It's That Bad...Posted By Rod Kaufman |
Wrong, fact checked again by AP: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-235651652542Originally Posted by Richard Davis
She doesn't oversee or otherwise have anything to do with capitol hill security?
Actually Yes Nancy Pelosi IS in Charge. She isn't the ONLY person, but YES it is her responsibility and she blew it before the Capitol Attack.
You wants facts. CNN once again misled you.
The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House.
Nancy Pelosi was told there might be big trouble coming to the Capitol.
Chief of Police Sund on Jan. 4 requested that Nancy Pelosi provide National Guard Security to the Capitol.
Being in charge of ALL operational decisions in the US House of Reps, Nancy Pelosi DENIED his request for Nat. Gd presence.
His request required the approval of the Speaker of the House and SHE DENIED his request.
She'll try to keep that question from coming up when they do their song and dance and try to cast blame everywhere aside from themselves, and you'll absorb the lies hook, line, and sinker.
The question about Pelosi's responsibility will NEVER be asked by the 2 RINOs (Pelosi Democrats) on the Commission, so she'll never take her obvious responsiblity.
Here are the Facts:
1. Police Chief Sund requested that National Guard be placed at the Capitol on the 4th of Jan.
2. Nancy Pelosi DENIED the request of the Police Chief.
Nancy Pelosi lied according to Chief Sund, whose resignation she requested.
She said he never contacted her.
Chief Sund refuted that in a letter directly sent to Pelosi who is a liar (like most leftist Democrats) that he did contact her 2 times on the 6th.
Here are the specific times: At 5:36 PM and at 6:25PM.
That's pretty precise.
FACT (from Letter to Pelosi): Chief Sund requested the National Guard be activated ahead of the January 6th Joint Session of Congress, the response from the SAA, acting on your behalf, was that the “optics” of having the National Guard on-site were not good and the intelligence didn’t support the move. The request was not approved.
Chief Sund confirmed all those facts above.
End of story.
It's That Bad...Posted By Rod Kaufman |
Nonsense! And it' the same nonsense you're parroting from the silliness of various Republicans who are attempting to deflect blame from Trump and his riotous insurrectionists.Originally Posted by Richard Davis
No, what I wrote was correct. You've simply done your little link to an article that you most likely didn't read past the header, and you can't debate anything because you're a total lightweight when it comes to knowing anything.
Here's a clue for you and the author of the article, who has no credibility, since she didn't address the fact that the SAA takes his orders from Pelosi.
The author is so stupid that she brought up McConnell.
Here's a clue for you and her. McConnell is in the Senate, not the House of the Reps.
Not that I'd expect you to know that, but that's ok.
This is the first sentence from the AP moron: As Speaker of the House, Pelosi does not direct the National Guard.
Gee, really? She doesn't??
What the hell does that have to do with anything. it is Nancy Pelosi's House, not McConnell's House.
FACT: She was offered the National Guard by Trump. Pelosi on Jan 4 was told that the National Guard could be there to assist.
FACT: Nancy Pelosi DENIED the request to have them sent there on the 4th of Jan.
FACT: Then at 5:36 PM on Jan. 6 during the riot, She gave in and said "Yes, please send in the Guard".
FACT: Pelosi was the one who dropped the ball. She was WARNED by more than a dozen people that things could go awry and she didn't Care.
Why? Because Pelosi was HOPING that something big would occur so that she could blame Trump.
FACT: Pelosi doesn't care about anything except power.
FACT: Your Democrats are running a one sided JOKE of a hearing.
FACT: This is the VERY 1st time in the history of this country that the Speaker threw out members of the committed chosen by the opposite Political Party.
Deal with all those facts.
It's That Bad...Posted By Rod Kaufman |
You might expect that from a wingynut but those wanting to know the facts can, instead, read this: https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/24/politics/capitol-sedition-charges-garland/index.htmlOriginally Posted by Richard Davis
There was no insurrection.
You might want to look that up.
Nobody has been charged with "insurrection", not one. Why do you think that is? C'mon, rub those 3 brain cells together! You can figure out why.
Anything else?
It's That Bad...Posted By Rod Kaufman |
The one you claimed you "heard" that the Flynn audio was doctored...Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Name one.
