Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Dual Clusters near Antares

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Mollise

August 21, 2010 01:14 PM Forum: Beginning Astronomy?

Light Polluted Skies - TMB 92 SS or 130 SS?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Raul Jarquin said:


What would you do in my shoes under bad (perhaps terrible) skies in your own patio?
Thanks.

I'd get a C8.

Under light polluted skies, aperture is extremely important. Four or five inches really ain't gonna get it. And that lovely wide-field performance for visual and imaging of the refractor doesn't amount to pea-turkey under compromised skies. More aperture and more focal length is the way to go if you're troubled by light pollution.

August 23, 2010 08:23 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Upgrade to CCD Camera or Stick with DSLR?

Posted By Rod Mollise

alan orr said:

Hi,
I have ~$1600 I can spend on a CCD camera if it makes sense. I was thinking used market. Wondering how much better this would be for short as well as long exposures than my Canon 50d? My short exposures are at 30 seconds and long exposures at least 5 minutes. This is with a Nexstar 11" GPS SCT with some light pollution (i.e. I can barely see spiral arms of the whirlpool galaxy with 30 second exposures ISO 3200 on reasonable nights).

I am weighing the trade offs with purchasing the CCD camera versus the Explore Scientific 6" refractor with the Celestron gc-5 (sp) mount.

In many ways I am newbee to the hobby. Thanks for any guidance and help!

Alan

In part it depends on your goals. If you want to go super deep, or do science, a CCD is recommended. HOWEVER...if you are more interested in pretty pictures, especially pretty color pictures, stick with DSLRs. You would be better off using the money to buy a modified DSLR or having your current one modified. TYou would be far better off with an 80mm ED refractor piggybacked on your SCT if your main focus is imaging.

At any rate, best advice is to get real good with what you have before jumpint to the More Better Gooder. wink

August 26, 2010 01:04 PM Forum: Celestron

C5 focus

Posted By Rod Mollise

James Black said:

Came across a white C5 spotter today. Focus on it is "rough". Focus on all the other S/C's that I had were smooth and even loose feeling. This on focuses sharply but is rough. Not tight, but rough. Does it need to be lubricated?

Could be due to any number of problems including the thin layer of grease on the baffle tube or problems with the threaded shaft. Try moving focus to both limits a few times and see if that helps.

August 28, 2010 12:51 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

DSLR question

Posted By Rod Mollise

David Landreth said:

I have done ccd imaging and did enjoy it. Now I want to try DSLR imaging, but I am not sure what camera would be a good one right off the shelf for under $900.00. I want to go for deepsky, not so much for planets, bright stars or star clusters.
Any info on brands, models and what I can expect on a non modified DSLR would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks David
Odessa,TX

Your best bet is to stick with Canon or Nikon; particularly Canon. Have a look at the Digital Rebel.

August 29, 2010 04:45 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

8" edge HD CGEM or meade 8" LX90 ACF?

Posted By Rod Mollise

aaron vaillant said:

Ok, I'm looking at purchasing one of these two systems but I can't make up my mind. Both are aplanatic and have great optics to my understanding. The Celestron is $400 dollars more than the Meade for the same aperture. I know the celestron comes on an CGEM mount but is it really worth the $400 difference. Would the meade with an equatorial wedge give me the same results for astrophotography? I'd like to use one of these systems to get started in astrophotography with a hyperstar setup. I guess my dilemma is trying to determine if the extra $400 is worth it to get the CGEM. Will it make a difference with my astrophotography if I'm using a hyperstar setup? Any good advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.


Neither will help you with Fastar. The Celestron provides field flattening and coma reduction via a corrector lens in the baffle tube, which is obviously not used during Fastar/Hyperstar operation. The ACF provides field flattening by means of a strongly aspheric secondary, which, again, won't be used during Fastar operaton.

For my money, the more steady GEM mount and more user friendly HC of the Celestron puts it in the lead, but I have always liked the 90, too.

August 29, 2010 04:49 PM Forum: AstroMart FAQ

How many times must I sign in?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Robert Schmall said:

I just spent a half hour and a lot of my limited brain power to post a thoughtful response to Christine Canelos Walsh's post on abortion. After all that that effort I hit the popup that required me to sign in again BEFORE posting. How the hell do you think I got onto that thread in the first place? BY SIGNING IN. So my effort was lost--my post never appeared. Please explain.

I've had this happen to me a time or two... I believe spending too much time in the editor will cause you to time-out and be logged off due to account inactivity. If the words are really beginning to flow, I suggest you use an external editor--even Notepad--and cut and paste.

September 7, 2010 01:37 PM Forum: Celestron

CPC 1100

Posted By Rod Mollise

Good on ya. 8)

September 9, 2010 09:35 PM Forum: Mounts

Guiding a C8 Fork Mount

Posted By Rod Mollise

Matthew Reiche said:

Hey guys. Has anyone ever tried guiding with a Fork Mount? I have a Celestron C-8 with a powerstar PEC. It has the dec motor and very slow stepper motors. I got a st-4 converter box and successfully got it to connect and work with PHD guiding.

However the program loses its star after a minute or so and im not sure what im doing wrong. The motors, while slow, should be plenty fast enough to guide if run properly. I have tried playing with the settings and I think I have the pulsing length set to max. But still when the program sees the star moving in a direction, it just sends a quick pulse and then sooner or later the star just takes off in the other direction leaving me with awful star trailing.

I guess im looking for someone who has heard of this being done or done it themselves. Maybe one of you more experienced guys have some words or wisdom! I don't want to have to break down and buy a GEM! Any help or advice is appreciated.

The speed of the motors has nothing to do with it. I've guided plenty of older scopes both manually and with an autoguider.

What matters? Balance is critical. Make sure you are slightly east heavy.

Polar alignment. You don't necessarily need to drift, but you need to be close.

Settings. You need to play around with them to optimize performance. You do not mention whether or not your calibration is completing successfully either; if it is not, you will never guide properly.


September 16, 2010 08:06 PM Forum: Reflectors

Starblast 6 on a VersaGo II

Posted By Rod Mollise

Alan Koff said:

Was not happy with the little table-top mount that came with Starblast 6, worked OK, but you need a level platform, not the hood of your car or truck, and the height is very limiting.

So I figured on the Orion VersaGo II with steel legs to be the ticket for a better grab-n-go. The OTA and mount weigh just over 30 lbs. and provides good height for shorter peeps, or my starchair at my 6'2" height.

Plenty of clearance at the legs with the short tube, can go up to 75* elevation at the legs, or near 90* in between. I also went with an Orion 8" dovetail plate, I think that is 3" wider than the Starblast mount holes.

Super steady mount, I have not needed to extend the legs at my height with this short tube reflector. Smooth hand slewing from the factory bearings, and it was easy to get balanced with the 12 lb. 750mm OTA. Circles as well for object locating. Good stuff from Orion.






I'm doing the same thing with my 4.5-inch StarBlast--great little scope, useable but inconvenient mount.

September 22, 2010 12:00 PM Forum: AstroMart FAQ

Possible Scam?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Joel Johnson said:

the response struck me as being overly reassuring that the seller could be trusted.


Does that mean you _were_ reassured or you _weren't_? What your problem was is not at all clear.

Anyway, no, Astromart has not been hacked. wink