I think I'll keep my ProntoPosted By Larry Citro |
Hi,
Last night I was looking at double stars with my orange tube C8 and my Pronto mounted side by side. The seeing was very good (7 to 8) and I took time to collimate the C8 at 600x.
I’m not a big time double star observer, but I decided to observe some of the doubles which were listed in James Mullaney’s article in the July issue of Sky and Telescope.
The C8 did outperform the Pronto in some respects. I was able to split Antares at 666x with it and see a second diffraction disk at the 274 degree position in moments of better seeing. It was hopeless in the Proto.
What amazed me is on the brighter pairs (down to mag 7 or 8) the Pronto gave views just as pleasing and sometimes better because of the lack of a bright first diffraction ring then the C8. Izar for instance at and the double double were equally pleaing in both scopes.
V Sco the C8 split the brighter closer pair (mag 4.3 and 5.3 , 1.3 “ ) at 400x while the Pronto did elongate them at 210x. Both scopes split the dimmer wider pair ( mag 6.6 and 7.2, 2.4” separation).
As far as the color of the doubles, the C8 displayed them with greater intensity but false color was not an here issue for me with the Pronto.
On the moon at 210x & 250x the views between the Pronto anc C8 differed .. the c8 the winner.. better resolution, no false color on the limbs ...yes it is present in the Pronto but not obtrusive. But the pronto threw up a very respectable view. The moon itself was of course dimmer and slightly more yellow in color in the Pronto.
The Pronto takes a lot of knocks because it’s not an apo, but IMHO it makes a fine scope for viewing the brighter doubles with separations as close as 1.3”. For wide field viewing at 15 to 30x it makes a great lightweight quick look scope on it Panoramic mount.
I think I’ll keep it for a while.
Clear skies,
Larry Citro
Last night I was looking at double stars with my orange tube C8 and my Pronto mounted side by side. The seeing was very good (7 to 8) and I took time to collimate the C8 at 600x.
I’m not a big time double star observer, but I decided to observe some of the doubles which were listed in James Mullaney’s article in the July issue of Sky and Telescope.
The C8 did outperform the Pronto in some respects. I was able to split Antares at 666x with it and see a second diffraction disk at the 274 degree position in moments of better seeing. It was hopeless in the Proto.
What amazed me is on the brighter pairs (down to mag 7 or 8) the Pronto gave views just as pleasing and sometimes better because of the lack of a bright first diffraction ring then the C8. Izar for instance at and the double double were equally pleaing in both scopes.
V Sco the C8 split the brighter closer pair (mag 4.3 and 5.3 , 1.3 “ ) at 400x while the Pronto did elongate them at 210x. Both scopes split the dimmer wider pair ( mag 6.6 and 7.2, 2.4” separation).
As far as the color of the doubles, the C8 displayed them with greater intensity but false color was not an here issue for me with the Pronto.
On the moon at 210x & 250x the views between the Pronto anc C8 differed .. the c8 the winner.. better resolution, no false color on the limbs ...yes it is present in the Pronto but not obtrusive. But the pronto threw up a very respectable view. The moon itself was of course dimmer and slightly more yellow in color in the Pronto.
The Pronto takes a lot of knocks because it’s not an apo, but IMHO it makes a fine scope for viewing the brighter doubles with separations as close as 1.3”. For wide field viewing at 15 to 30x it makes a great lightweight quick look scope on it Panoramic mount.
I think I’ll keep it for a while.
Clear skies,
Larry Citro