To paraphrase Clinton (this is the politics forum, after all 8) ), define "excellence".
I am a visual only observer--used to do astrophotography but now I have no wish to blow $50k. Some time ago I sold most of my high dollar APOs to free up some funds, in anticipation of the financial market turmoil. At the same time Celestron was doing a promotion of the CPC line. I found a store demo CPC9.25 and was able to get it for less than $2000 after all discounts.
Based on my memory, is the scope as good as the AP155 I once had on planets? No. Is it as contrasty on clusters? No. Is the star test perfect? No (but not bad at all). Is it better on DSO? Well, the image is brighter.
I bought the CPC knowing full well it is nowhere as optically superior as the high dollar APOS... for crying out loud the whole scope costs a lot less than a decent mount that can support the AP155. Am I satisfied? You bet... and I don't need someone to tell me my CPC is not as good as their APO... I have owned a handful of them (see my feedback

) Best of all, I had FUN observing and not worrying about whether I would scratch its paint.
The funny thing is, this astro-snobbery NEVER manifests itself in star parties. We all share scopes and stories, not once did I hear anything like "my APO is better than your Meade". Perhaps people have better things to do than bickering online?
ps: I have NO idea where the CPC is made in. Never bothered to look.