It's quiet. Too quiet.Posted By Rod Kaufman |
It's clear from Trump's many actions that he's a psychopath. As such, he doesn't care about the ramifications of his actions along as they serve an immediate gratification of his own needs. In this instance, his actions by way omission and co-mission in his speech was to incite the crowd in order to keep in himself in power to satisfy his own need to do so. That's also why he watched, with great satisfaction, the rioting within the capitol without calling for it to stop.Originally Posted by James Brown
Hi Rod, Jim:
Is Trump a mastermind or a buffoon?
You guys think he incited violence. If Trump truly was inciting an insurrection, he clearly was cagey enough to walk up to the line of criminality but not step over it. I have read the transcript of his speech. Some quotes taken out of context make it sound like he was inciting violence. But overall, each of those quotes, in context, has a more innocuous "political rah-rah" interpretation too. If Trump was actually inciting violence, he was masterful and cautious - he spun up the crowd to march on the Capitol, but never really exposed himself to legit criminal charges. This would be Trump the mastermind, and I'm not buying it.
I think he spun up the crowd of adoring fans without thinking of any consequences. When did he ever think before he acted? Did he even know there were some in the crowd hell-bent on violence, up to and including allegedly hanging Pence? I doubt it. Maybe he should have known the danger. Maybe he should have listened to level headed advice. But when did he ever do that, to this day? I'm in the Trump as a buffoon camp, and I do not think the second impeachment was righteous at all.
We'll see if any future or current president pays the price for cheapening the impeachment process into something along the lines of a feeble censure. You could argue that the cheapening of impeachment has been a long time coming, and you'd be right - but that does not mean the most recent instance was a good idea.
Jim