Unrealistic and inconsistent requirementsPosted By Paul Kammueller |
Neither of these sorts of experiences or evidence is really a comparable situation.
Pain: a subjective experience to be sure. But this subjective experience is easy for people to accept as 'real' because everyone feels pain. Not so the case with religious experiences, visions, divine revelations, etc. If only a few people in the world had ever felt pain, there would certainly be reason among others to doubt that this thing called "pain" really existed. And of course if people from different cultures experienced very different kinds of 'pain' it would make things harder still.
Black holes, by contrast, are theoretically deduced structures based on what our understanding of physics 'should' result in given a certain set of initial conditions. That is physics, theory and deductive reasoning, which is a very different thing than subjective reasoning.
Pain: a subjective experience to be sure. But this subjective experience is easy for people to accept as 'real' because everyone feels pain. Not so the case with religious experiences, visions, divine revelations, etc. If only a few people in the world had ever felt pain, there would certainly be reason among others to doubt that this thing called "pain" really existed. And of course if people from different cultures experienced very different kinds of 'pain' it would make things harder still.
Black holes, by contrast, are theoretically deduced structures based on what our understanding of physics 'should' result in given a certain set of initial conditions. That is physics, theory and deductive reasoning, which is a very different thing than subjective reasoning.