Image of the day

Captured by
Shane Yarnall

LDN 1622

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

November 17, 2021 10:33 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Are you truly THIS stupid?  I'm asking because I don't think I've ever dealt with a person who is proving in real time, just how Ignorant they are of a situation like this.

The Settlement REQUIRED that the Covington kid or his lawyer NOT reveal the amount, so why would HE or Lyn Wood Brag openly about the amount since it would result in him losing the settlement, since he would be violating their legal contract?

Do you really NOT know this fact of the settlement?

He can't talk about it you complete and utter ignoramus!   tongue

It is called a confidentiality clause.  Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with one.

Then you wouldn't be exposing your abject stupidity.  wink
“If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss."
https://lawandcrime.com/media/some-lawyers-think-covington-catholics-nick-sandmann-walked-away-from-media-lawsuits-with-peanuts/

November 18, 2021 02:26 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Lacey


Grosskreutz, the only survivor shot by Rittenhouse, testified he pursued Rittenhouse because he thought he was an active shooter. An all too common problem when you start inserting lots of armed civilians into volatile situations.

I'm not saying the defense had not put up a good counter-argument. I'm merely saying if you ignore all of the politics and the left versus right, it seems clear to me that Rittenhouse caused the whole situation.

Here's an analogy.

I'm walking down the street, and I see some people vandalizing cars that are not mine. I tell them to stop. Instead, they flip me the bird. I then pull out my gun, point it at them and ask them to stop. One of the vandals then charges at me completely unarmed. He is threatening, and I'm in fear for my life. So, I fire at him four times, hitting him each time killing him. Am I legally justified in my actions, or is this murder? The above analogy is almost identical to Rittenhouse's actions, and I think he was wrong and caused the whole situation. Rittenhouse had no business being there with a rifle trying to protect property that was not his, and the owners did not ask him to watch. It's not self-defense since Rittenhouse provoked and caused the entire situation. When you do something to provoke a crisis, you cannot use deadly force to defend yourself from the threat you caused. Imagine if you could get away with that what our society would look like.
Well, there are the actions taken by Rittenhouse and what he stated his motivations were for being at the scene in the first place. He didn't live in the community and he took it upon himself to come armed when he arrived there. Once there, he lied and told people and caught on camera that he was there as an EMT. He has never been an EMT. So, his stated representation of himself on scene doesn't jive with his stated motivation of being there to aid the community. Perhaps you can recall instances where EMTs are on scene to render aid with an AR15 but I can't. 
I don't think the area he was in has a "stand your own ground" law in effect so that negates a defense based upon that idea. 
So what's left as his motive for being at the scene armed with an AR15? 
I think the dead people there as the result of his actions represent his motivation for being there...

November 18, 2021 03:14 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James:

Rittenhouse would probably be getting on with his life right now, if there had not been a riot going on.  So I do not agree that he caused the whole situation.  Nor do I agree that you "caused" the situation in your hypothetical.  The man who charged you before you shot him quite possibly put you in legitimate fear for your own life. I think that is an issue in the Rittenhouse trial, although I have not read the jury instructions.  Given the circumstances, was your fear for your own well being reasonable?  It matters that the victim chose to vandalize cars.  He chose to charge you when you pulled a gun on him.  

I would not be surprised if you violated a gun law or two or maybe committed manslaughter in many states, but I do not think you committed murder.   

Jim
" if there had not been a riot going on."
If it wasn't that riot, it very well may have been another. That doesn't give a shooter a right to show up and shoot and kill people. A man gets caught in his own doing...

November 18, 2021 12:11 PM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Lacey


His home is in Antioch, Illinois. He was a lifeguard at Pleasant Prairie, a village between his home at Antioch and Kenosha, WI. I never said he bought the gun. There was lots of drone footage shown at the trial showing him pointing the gun at people repeatedly. I believe that you are striking out, but more importantly, it's impossible to have a simple difference of opinion with you. Instead, you always have to be in this rabid attack-dog mode where the only possible conclusion is that everyone else is an idiot, and only you have access to the truth. You might, for example, look at how Jim and I disagreed on some of the salient points of the matter without being assholes. It won't happen, I know, but what the hell; I thought I'd give it the old college try.
I'd add that much of what he disagrees with is frequently characterized as a "lie" no matter what the context. No mistakes no factual disagreements just you're a liar no matter what. No shades of grey, all black and white; typical con behavior...

November 19, 2021 01:54 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Brown

"It was found that the prosecution had deliberately kept exculpatory evidence of drone footage by the cops out of the hands of the defense when they had it all along."  

If this turns out to be literally true, Rittenhouse walks.  That sort of misconduct can never be tolerated.  J
Both the prosecutors and the defense lawyers got the email and the compressed file from a police detective. The drone footage seen by the jury was the enhanced version and not the compressed version, both during the trial and, at the jury's request, upon review during their deliberations.

November 19, 2021 03:19 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

The original footage that the defense team saw was the grainy footage. 

That is a fact, and you're free to believe whatever you want.  

The prosecutor already admitted in open court that their copy was "MUCH clearer".  

He said flat out, verbatim because I listened to it:  "Yes, our version is MUCH clearer". 

That's Word for Word demorrhoid. wink
"Prosecutors countered that the jury saw the highest-quality version of the video during the trial and it was played without objection."

November 19, 2021 09:56 AM Forum: Politics

November 24, 2021 05:40 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Kyle's apparent plans on defamation lawsuits:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2ofQ_UXFSM

November 28, 2021 03:58 AM Forum: Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse should be a very rich person after he sues everyone in the media who defamed him.

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Oh, that moron again?

I watched the 1st 15 seconds of that idiot you watch, the bleeding heart lib who said "they're doing exactly what we thought and they're making a hero out of Kyle Rittenhouse".

As opposed to You and your side who are making heroes out of, the Feloniously Convicted Pedophile who was shot by Kyle R. and the other Convicted Felons.

I'd rather be on my side, supporting a kid who was found not guilty of any crimes that night, as opposed to You who supports the career criminals, while your bleeding heart weeps for those cretins.

So I'll just point out who Your personal  heroes are.  They are the scum of the Earth.  You might want to check your morality. Its pretty much non-existent IMO.

The first one you are lionizing is a 5X convicted Pedophile, who anally sodomized 5 young boys, ages 9 to 11, and served 10 years in prison, for his crimes against children who tried to kill Kyle R., whom Kyle R. had to shoot to save his own life from the criminal who told him "I'm gonna' Kill you Mother F'er", and then tried to do just that.

He is the first one that You and your guys made a martyr and hero of.

The 2nd was another criminal with a rap sheet longer than my dick, and was up on charges of domestic violence.  That's Your 2nd hero of the night.

That scumbag Huber had already bashed Kyle R. in the head with his large wooden skateboard that night and was in the process of trying to Kill Kyle R. WITH that skateboard, when Kyle R. shot him to prevent him from Killing Kyle R.

You and Yours weep for the scumbag criminals which isn't surprising, rather than standing up for the right to self-defense of a 17 year old boy being attacked by the MOB.

That's just how sick in the head You and yours are.  

The third was a convicted criminal who tried to shoot Kyle R. with his GLOCK handgun, and whom if Kyle R. did NOT shoot, would have shot Kyle R. Dead.

Those are the scumbags You and Yours are making into heroes.  

I'll stick with the 17 year old kid and take his side, the side that was vindicated in Court last week, while You can continue to stand with convicted Felons and a convicted 5X PEDOPHILE who sodomized 5 young boys.

That's the guy YOU support you sick bastard.  

November 17, 2021 12:55 AM Forum: Politics

Nothing says "trust the science" like

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer
"you cant sue us if something goes wrong"

or

"covid testers arent required to quarantine when someone tests positive"

Jus sayin...... lol
Typical Greg non-cited quotes without citations so one might be able to ascertain the source or read the article for either bias or context.
Jus sayin......lol