Posts Made By: Richard Davis

Fuck the communist Democrats, eh...

Fuck the communist Democrats, eh...

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Well, I guess there is a silver lining:

"Election law attorney Ben Ginsberg said Monday that President Trump’s executive order imposing restrictions on mail-in voting will largely impact Republican voters."

“One thing is, I think you’re going to see some blowback from Republicans in the coming weeks, because after all, Republicans are the older party and older folks like to vote by mail. They’re the rural party,” Ginsberg said during a Monday appearance on CNN’s “The Source.”

“And certainly vote by mail is important to people in rural areas. And thanks to Donald Trump, there are many more low propensity voters in the Republican Party,” he added."


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6050455-trump-mail-voting-order-impacts-gop/

Yes because leftist atty Ben Ginsberg is all knowing. If he makes the claim, it must be correct.  Omnipotence remains among one of the left's most outstanding abilities!!  LOL

Originally Posted by Pete Brayton

I too thought BRIBERY was illegal!

How is that in any sense of the word Bribery. I thought that you were smarter than that Pete, but for once I am proven wrong on this forum.  

Did he say that he would pay all adults to vote for him?  Oh wait, he did NOT.  

He said "if the Republicans win both houses of Congress, then he (the gov't) would pay every adult in the US $5K.

It appears I'm missing the bribery portion of the statement.

If a politician said to the masses "If the Demo-rats win both the house and the Senate, we will lower taxes on all Americans by 5%" is that a bribe?  Yes or no please.  

Now, I realize that the above Might appear to be a trick question, since the Demo-rats will NEVER Lower taxes on the American but will only RAISE taxes, because they are socialists/communists who hate capitalism.  Understand that is not a trick question but a valid one.  

And to sum up, of course there was NO bribe at all in any sense of the word, but feel free to explain your confusion.

Thanks Pete and enjoy the weekend.

Originally Posted by Pete Brayton

Vote for me and I'll give you $5000. Sounds like a bribe to me. But then you know everything.

"Vote for me and I'll give you $5000".  Why do you have to lie about what he said?  Is your assertion that lame and pathetic that you just have to make up and lie about what Donald Trump said.  

I've noticed that so much with you leftists, that you just make stuff up.  "

He didn't say anything like that. He said "IF the Republicans win both the house and the Senate, then I will issue a dividend of $5k to every adult American".

So I'll ask again since you failed to answer the question and had to make up what you said.  How is anything that he said REMOTELY similar to a bribe?  The words that you claimed he stated are a flat out lie.

Now then, where did I say that I know everything? I asked a question and challenged the lie that you put forth. I realize that you TDS suffering Socialist Democrats hear what you want to hear 90% of the time, rather than what is said but don't get angry and pissed off because someone challenges you on the lies that come out of your mouth and you can't defend your lies.  

Simply put, you sound like a petulant little boy whose Mommy took away his Tonka truck. 
Get over it.  You lied.  I called you on your lie and you're ovviously as mad as a hornet.  

Originally Posted by James Brown

Mad as a hornet?   🐝.   I must have missed that part of your post, Pete.   

Only a fool would defend Trump’s most recent “dividend/rebate” lie.   Only an extreme fool would resort to pedantic nit-picking to defend the indefensible.   Jim

Oh, so now the little leftist tool here is butthurt that I'm taking on his Communist/Socialist buddies on this forum I see.  

If you had a pair, I'd simply challenge you to "defend" the lies of your little buddies here, however since your past responses are an indicator of your inability to debate any subject, political or otherwise, I will just assume you are too much of an intellectual lightweight to engage.  Then again, such is the nature of intellectual cowards like yourself.  

Having stated the facts above, let me just posit that aside from another pathetic attempt at a drive by insult, and before you wriggle back to the dog crap that sustains maggots like you, would you care to take a shot at answering how Donald Trump's political promise/statement is a "Bribe"?  

I doubt you will because like all leftist losers, the best you can muster is to run away and hide under your desk as you invariably do when challenged. 

It certainly isn't surprising that your intellectual vacuousness is driving your anger and irritation.

Now you can feel free to wriggle away like a leftist worm.  

Originally Posted by Pete Brayton

18 U.S. Code § 597 - Expenditures to influence voting
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and

Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 601(a)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝

Wow, you mean to tell me that you were a teacher and are THIS ignorant of the reading of a statute?? 

No wonder our young people are just so damned stupid after graduating high school.  

The dumbest ones must have been your students if this is your interpretation and understanding of that statute.  My only reponse to you is to tell you to quit watching Joy Reid or Al Sharpton over at MSNBC.  They will simply make you dumber than you obviously are.  

P.S.  Did you get your misinterpretation of the statute there from George Conway or some other idiot suffering from TDS?

Originally Posted by James Brown

Mad as a hornet?   🐝.   I must have missed that part of your post, Pete.   

Only a fool would defend Trump’s most recent “dividend/rebate” lie.   Only an extreme fool would resort to pedantic nit-picking to defend the indefensible.   Jim

I see that as always, you once again hide under your desk as you do your usual drive by commentary whereby you are too big of an intellectual pussy to answer or engage.

So then are you going to continue to dodge and hide under your desk after your attempt at an insult?  

Gee, what a shocker, that you don't have the balls to engage, and instead choose to ignore the very basic question which is this, Where was the bribe that the dumbest of people out there are trying to claim?

Are you just another "extreme fool" since you don't have the intellectual chops to make the legal case?  It certainly appears that you are just that.

So once again nothing new from the clown who purports to be a lawyer.  Its too bad that you are woefully incapable of arguimg the issue, but then why would we all expect anything different from a person who is nothing more than a glorified bookkeeper?

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

If playground insults were legal arguments, you’d be Clarence freaking Darrow.

If playground insults were legal arguments, then I'd be in 2nd place behind Jim Brown who was the first to call me a "fool" and then an "extreme fool" in his drive by response.

Of course leftist Democrat ideologues like yourself feel entitled to ignore the insults hurled by those who hold the same leftist ideologies as you towards anyone on the right.

But hey, don't let principles get in the way of your leftist Democrat hypocrisy, which is always there 24/7/365.

Originally Posted by James Brown

If I were you Rich, I would call you a liar because I never actually called you a fool or an extreme fool in my post. Reread my post. I simply didn’t call you those things “by name.“ I did describe certain characteristics of people I believe to be fools and extreme fools, and if you happen to apply those characteristics to yourself, so be it.   In any event, according to the Davis rules of engagement, you are clearly a liar.

On the other hand, for rational people, it was indeed pretty clear from the context of my post that I was implying you are indeed a fool, and an extreme fool at that. I’m glad you caught my drift.

This  little  example of pedantic gamesmanship is instructive, because I don’t think Trump‘s statements would ever be prosecuted as criminal bribery. On the other hand, it is clear to everyone with half a brain that Trump was trying to buy votes. I’m not as fussed about it as some since I think all politicians do this. For example, Biden was trying to buy votes when he canceled student debt. Trump was trying to buy votes when he passed the big beautiful Bill. Biden was trying to buy votes when he passed the inflation reduction act, and so on and so on and so on. Bottom line, it is pretty darn hilarious to see you strut about (metaphorically) and resort to pedantic nitpicking to defend the indefensible.

Other than to laugh out loud at your attempt to weasel out of your words, the only suitable response would be to say that I've seen some extreme examples of spin in that first paragraph of yours, and then I've seen the Academy award winning example of it, in your reply above.

So then let me try to make sense of your convoluted thinking and the mentally deranged thinking, coming out of your warped brain here.  You addressed my post, then sideswiped in a drive by attempt for a record breaking 2nd time at an insult, then claimed you were NOT calling me out "directly", but then you actually have the balls in your second paragraph to admit that "indeed it was pretty clear from the context of my post that I was implying you are indeed a fool, and an extreme fool at that", which were YOUR words, and then say "I'm glad you caught my drift"?

I have to say that i can't even imagine what it is like in your household to even think of the bizarre conversations that must take place in that domicile of yours there, when you are involved.  Do the others look at you most of the time with a glazed look of confusion across their collective faces, when you start into your fits of mental madness???

Honestly, I would love to be a fly on the wall then just to see their dropped jaws!  LOL. Tell your wife to have the straightjacket ready to have those men in the clean white coats show up to take you away.

I can only imagine that your word salad above and your unhinged mental state, where you epitomize the phrase "baffle another with complete bullshit" will play well with the rest of the leftist loons here on this forum of psychotic mentally challenged midgets.

I can't be positive but your response above clearly indicates as I have stated many times before, you don't have the balls to engage in a rational dialogue, and that certainly proved out in your reply above.