Image of the day

Captured by
Ralph Ford

M31 with Redcat 51

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Mollise

July 9, 2011 08:42 PM Forum: N.A.S.A.

Last Shuttle Launches

Posted By Rod Mollise

Andreas Saldivar said:

Another beautiful launch of the shuttle.

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=100244431

It's a sad day though. Never thought I would see the end of the US manned space flight program. I know that may be an exaggeration but I think it will be at least 15 years before we see another.

Andreas

Maybe we will. Probably we won't. And beyond that? I doubt it. I will put it this way: I do not expect to live to see us return to the Moon much less go to Mars. And I ain't _that_ old. Furthermore the _unmanned_ space program is on the chopping block and I fully expect it to be whittled away to nothingness.

August 3, 2011 09:57 PM Forum: Global Warming - REAL or NOT

New Nasa Data...Blow to GW Alarmists

Posted By Rod Mollise

Timothy McDougall said:

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

Summary:"When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are."


Yeah, from Forbes, that basion of objectivity. LOL!

TRANSLATON:

"Scientists: have you stopped beating your wives?"

August 8, 2011 10:26 AM Forum: Reflectors

Older Telescope?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Looks home-brew to me.

August 12, 2011 01:22 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Webcam for Astrophoto

Posted By Rod Mollise

Ted Smith said:

What webcam for astrophotography do you recommend that is compatible with Windows 7 32-bit OS that would have good control of exposure, gamma, etc? ('scuse me if I am revealing my ignorance....)

None. Oh, if you can find an older Quikcam or Phillips Toucam, it could work, but it will require modification if you expect to use it on anything but the Moon and planets. On which it will work fine. Today's webcams, the few available ain't much good for Astro.

If you want to try webcam Solar System imaging, look at the Celestron NexImage.

August 12, 2011 01:25 PM Forum: Global Warming - REAL or NOT

The Majority View about the Science

Posted By Rod Mollise

Unfortunately, Alan, it's not a question of science. The political demagogues of our era have found it to be a convenient political football, and even if they new pea-turkey about science, it would be IGNORED. wink

August 13, 2011 02:36 PM Forum: Refractors

80mm preference

Posted By Rod Mollise

I use a William Optics Fluorite 80, but, alas, those are long gone, I believe. My current fave? A buddy's new Explore Scientific.

August 17, 2011 09:50 AM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

A Question for Those Who Observe with Smaller Tele

Posted By Rod Mollise

Mark Costello III said:

I'd like to throw this out for those of y'all who spend a fair amount of time observing with telescopes 6" or smaller. Last night, I spent maybe an hour, hour and a half in Ophiuchus, divided about equally between Globulars M10 and M12. Observing both with a 5" refractor, at times it seemed that there was a thin spray of stars that could be seen across the face of each, particularly at 206X. Also, at both 103X and 206X, it seemed that I could see a spray of stars around them. The background material on these clusters indicate that they are a bit loose for globulars. So I wasn't too surprised to see some individual stars in and near them. But I thought I'd ask: Has anyone gotten this type of partial resolution (or better) with a telescope of similar size?

Thanks very much.

I get fairly good resolution of both globulars with my 5-inch MCT...when it's dark and they are decently high.

August 20, 2011 03:27 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Auto-Guider / Planet Camera

Posted By Rod Mollise

Russell Sipe said:

I am putting together a new system from the ground up. I am looking at both the new SBI Auto-guider/Planet Camera and the Starlight Express Lodestar. I am hoping to get some opinions on these two products.

Also, I know the advantage of a mono ccd for going deep in the sky, but what wouild be the advantage of a mono camera over a color camera for auto-guiding and planetary work? SBIG offers color or mono at the same price.

Thanks in advance for any comments

I have no doubt it will be a fine autoguider. Planetary camera? I will have to be convinced by results, which I haven't seen yet. SBIG's wide field and fairly low resolution Moon pictures ain't showing me much. wink

August 20, 2011 03:29 PM Forum: Mounts

CGEM vs CG-5 mounts

Posted By Rod Mollise

robin woolsey said:

I've got a quick question about the tripods for the CGEM and CG-5 goto mounts. Are they the same tripod and would the CGEM head work on a CG-5 tripod? I know Celestron beefed up the tripod from 2" to 2.75" for the DX but the tripods for the CG-5 and CGEM look the same.
Thanx robin

I believe you will find the tripods are not interchangeable, just as the CG5 and Atlas tripods ain't interchangeable despite being nearly identical.

August 23, 2011 10:23 PM Forum: Mounts

Alt/Az mounts for astrophotography?

Posted By Rod Mollise

Bob Polcyn said:

Hi all -- Are we anywhere near a time when alt/az mounts will have steppers fine enough for astrophotography? The big mountain top observatories have had them for years. IOptron sells units that GOTO and track but not well enough for astrophotography (I haven't had a chance to play with one myself).
I can guess at least part of the answer -- cost -- but are there other factors which make such a mount impractical?

Bob Polcyn

It's not the drive motors, it's the field de-rotator that is the stumbling block. Not only do you need a derotator that is accurate, autoguiding software must guide in alt-az mode AND guide on the third axis. So far no amateur grade equipment has met these needs...mainly because a wedge is cheaper and easier.