Hugh Bartlett said:
On another thread, someone has implied that those who questioned the urgency of taking action to limit man's influence on global climate change were "anti-science". In response to that accusation, one might be interested in this Yale University study of who really is more scientifically knowledgeable: those espousing the sky is falling scenario, or those who are skeptical of this alarmist message.
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/07/yale-study-global-warming-skepticism.html
You are right. But many of them _are_. There will be a few well qualified scientists who will be in opposition to mainstream opinion ON ANY ISSUE, and that is fine.
However, the majority of Deniers are not scientists. They are the barely scientifically literate (judging by their public comments) like Michelle Bachman and Jame Inhofe. If they are not scientifically illiterate, they are pretending to be for political advantage.
Oh, and most scientists are not saying THE SKY IS FALLING, either. That is completely incorrect--unless you judge that the consensus: "Manmade global warming is a serious problem" means "the sky is falling," And I do not believe you do.