Hi Jim,
I've been kinda' tuning into Ben Shapiro more recently on the radio, and I think his legal group was one who was involved in submitting an Amicus brief on the case. He was speaking about it and his prediction was on the mark as to what the justices would do.
When I heard about it yesterday, I read the majority opinion, then switched to reading the minority opinion given by Breyer and signed onto by Kagan and Sotomayor.
It just struck me that with their dissent, once again the Constitution was pretty much not even referenced. The dissent given didn't cite Precedent or case law, just raw opinion, and the idea of the administrative state, having as much power as they simply take without authority is really bothersome.
This trend seems to me to be overtaking the liberal wing of the court, which is troubling to say the least, and why I mentioned it. Now I could be all wet and I'm reading more into it than I should, but Sotomayor seems to me to be a big offender in that realm.
Some of her writings I've read are strictly based in emotion IMO, and not at all based upon what the Constitution says, what case law is involved, and without precedent.
I sure hope this trend on the left doesn't continue, but we're now such a divided country, it is worse than ever.
I liked it much more when Renquist was the Chief Justice.
These days I'm becoming even more like Rand Paul and he's had some pretty good go rounds with a lot of bureaucrats up on Capitol Hill.
My libertarian streak is getting stronger and stronger, probably because I'm more aware that there are fewer and fewer politicians looking out for any of us Americans.
Its all about power, and its occurring on both sides of the aisle.
Have a happy and prosperous day.
P.S. If you haven't read it and you get a chance, pick up Mike Lee's book "Our Lost Constitution". He's a pretty good writer and it is very informative. If you want my copy, PM me and I'll send it to you.
