Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by James Lacey

Biden and his administration have done a fantastic job managing the Ukraine crisis. They have fostered and held together a tremendous Western coalition against Russia and reinvigorated and demonstrated the necessity of NATO and its relevance. If Trump were in charge, he would have been pressuring Ukraine to surrender a long time ago, and he sure as heck would not have been able to pull off the foreign policy victory Biden and his team have done. Biden's actions have made Russia pay a heavy price without escalating the conflict to where boots on the ground are required. Honestly, it's hard to imagine any administration could have handled it better than it has gone so far.

Russia is not a rational actor. The problem with Russia today is that a strong man effectively runs it. If Politburo had been back, and there had been more internal discussion and differences of opinion, the war might never have happened.

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

I do not think there is good evidence that Trump would be pressuring Ukraine to surrender. That would be considered a huge stain on a president's foreign policy. Every president and his advisors, hell the entire administration, would know this is the way they will be measured by history. All the other political bs would fall by the wayside.

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Is it clear he was asking Zelensky to make up stories, to manufacture evidence and lie about Biden? Couldn't a lawyer claim Trump knew the evidence was there, that Zelensky just needed to deliver it? 

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

You are so emotional your post is stupid.
They got the aid. Asking for dirt is a million miles from wanting them to surrender to Russia. But not to Rod. In fact, in Rod's mind(?) it is proof Trump wanted them to surrender to Russia!
But wait how about the BIG LIE. Isn't that proof Trump wanted them to surrender to Russia? No? It proves almost everything else, doesn't it?  But wait! LAURA INGRAHAM! Doesn't that prove Trump wanted them to surrender to Russia? No?
But, but, is not all this proof that Trump does not at all care what people, historians, and history think? In fact, is not it proof he doesn't even give a rat's ass what history will think of him? Uh no. Are you sure? Yes.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Not that I know much about this lady, but I did hear an audio clip where Fake News' Jim Acosta approached her and claimed lied, saying that she urged Trump to instill Martial Law.

He confronted her somewhere outside and jammed a mic in her face.  She came back with "read my tweet"

He read it aloud to here, which said "Many people are talking about Martial Law.  I don't know about that", to which Jim Acosta responded "your spelling of Martial is wrong". 

She said "I never urged him to enact Martial Law did I", to which he didn't have an answer. 

She then said, you're a professional Liar". 

Then he didn't know what to do so he said again "you're spelling is wrong". 

She then apparently walked away.  

That is just how much of a hack that Jim Acosta is.  The best he could come up with when she proved him to be a liar about what she said, was to then jump to criticism of her spelling of the word "Martial".

Now that has to be what any leftist drone would have to call out as "dynamite journalism".

He goes up to a citizen, lies about what they said, is called out for his lies, and then diverts the subject to criticism of her spelling.

That pathetic loser was CNN's main guy for about a decade.  Shows you the quality of the average CNN reporter. 

Not to mention that I believe his book sold about 2000 copies total. 

P.S.  Now just HOW pathetic IS Jim Acosta? 

Anyone can be the judge of this pathetic weasel: 

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/14/jim-acosta-book-signing/

The manager said he had to sign a book to himself because he didn't have an audience.  This guy is just beyond pathetic. 

After the 1st week of sales, when Jim Acosta's book came out, it was at 363 on the Amazon list of book sales. 

Books that have been out for more than 4 decades outsold his ridiculous book.  

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Is your opening post accurate? It is a fair question. Somewhere does she say she supports it?
Looks like she said several did but that she didn't know about that.

Originally Posted by James Lacey

Good, because I never said Oath Keepers liked Nazis. They are, however, an example of a far-right extremist militia that participated in the 1/6 insurrection, and not only did Trump encourage their participation, they think he did. All you have to do is RTFA and listen to Ulrich's words. There's plenty of evidence that Trump was and still is supported by neo-Nazi groups. Trump courted and sent out so many dog-whistles to these groups when he was President that we all became numb to it, but that doesn't mean it did happen.