Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

They were the actions of a few nutcases.  

We had 1000s of BLM rioters murder, loot, destroy property, commit arson all over the place, kill cops and YOU and the other DSs on the left never said a word.

You lied about it then and you're still lying about it.

Have you gotten that Big tattoo of a backwards "L" on the middle of your forehead yet, like we all thought you should??

It would be a reminder for you, every time you looked in the mirror.  

Or you could just get a T-shirt emblazoned with big red letters saying "I'm with Stupid" and then have an arrow pointing upwards to your fat meathead.

That would work as well.   

"They were the actions of a few nutcases". Funny, none of 'em have been found not guilty by reason of insanity. And do those "few nutcases" include Trump and his co-conspirators?
"We had 1000s of BLM rioters murder, loot, destroy property, commit arson all over the place, kill cops and YOU and the other DSs on the left never said a word."
"You lied about it then and you're still lying about it."
Actually, we've already covered this, time and time again, and nobody condones the violent actions of any protesters so if anybody is lying about it, it's you... 

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Why is he lying? You just said nobody condones the violence. But the BLM was more violent.

He's lying when he says I've lied about it. 

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

I don't know how one can watch the personalities on the more liberal news and believe they are not doing the same.
I think both sides do it. Naive to think otherwise. This is war!

No,  they are not Mel. Fox news' Maria Bartiromo sent her questions for her Trump interview to Meadows in the WH for vetting to make sure she could carry the interview as planned. Nobody does that. Hannity clearly played a significant role in an adviser capacity to the Trump WH. Nobody does that. Fox news propagandists continually pushed the big lie of election fraud and Fox and several of 'em now have to face the music from Smartmatic and Dominion. Nobody does the scale of this kind of propaganda except for Putin's Russia...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

"Nobody does the scale of this kind of propaganda except for Putins..."

Remarkable you believe everything one side says.
The side that was honest would not be doing their job and those smart professionals that went to some of our finest schools would be talked about a lot (can you believe they did not take advantage of ANY of those situations!) and fired immediately.
Politics is a dirty business with at least two sides doing dirty business!!!

I don't believe everything the other side says, if I did I wouldn't occasionally vote Republican from time to time. My point remains nobody has approximated the scale of co-operation of advising, favorably interviewing and favorably reporting on Trump the way Fox has done and that's a fact and not opinion or conjecture...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Definitely opinion. You are not giving credit to most of the media except FOXNEWS. Is FOXNEWS 20% of all other media? Don't know. But that was the amount aligned against Trump for a couple of years. It does dwarf FOXNEWS. I looked and for a couple of years it was all Trump in Putin's pocket and on and on and on.
Remember how you could look at the morning news and see the same words used in nearly ALL other news? Now that took some kind of co-operation. In fact in my 50 years of paying attention to the news I had not seen it!!

Don't confuse and conflate issues here. When Trump made a fool out of himself in front of the world with Putin in Helsinki, it's definitely newsworthy and, of course, you're going to see that being reported by the majority of new outlets. When Trump's campaign manager was found to be cooperating with the Russians by a Republican led Senate investigation team and later pardoned by Trump, then, of course, you're going to see that reported by the majority of news outlets. 
You need to go back and reread post #37. As the saying goes, Mel, you're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

No surprise to you that I am not moved at all by your "cold hard facts"
It is Trump's fault because he made a "fool of himself"
Newsworthy? For years he is Putin's stooge? Millions of words printed and you will not admit that the media simply did what they could to get Trump out in an operation that was the largest. EVER! Most of you still want to believe the computer was Russian disinfo!!
LUDICROUS!
The hell of this is that despite new info that will come out, 5 years from now you will still be blowing your horn with the same song.

Notice how Mel changed my original post:

Originally Posted by OUSRod Kaufman

Don't confuse and conflate issues here. When Trump made a fool out of himself in front of the world with Putin in Helsinki, it's definitely newsworthy and, of course, you're going to see that being reported by the majority of new outlets. When Trump's campaign manager was found to be cooperating with the Russians by a Republican led Senate investigation team and later pardoned by Trump, then, of course, you're going to see that reported by the majority of news outlets.
You need to go back and reread post #37. As the saying goes, Mel, you're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts...

No surprise to you that I am not moved at all by your "cold hard facts"
It is Trump's fault because he made a "fool of himself"
Newsworthy? For years he is Putin's stooge? Millions of words printed and you will not admit that the media simply did what they could to get Trump out in an operation that was the largest. EVER! Most of you still want to believe the computer was Russian disinfo!!
LUDICROUS!
The hell of this is that despite new info that will come out, 5 years from now you will still be blowing your horn with the same song.
Definitely the post of a rational man, wouldn't you say?...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

And what is the "rational man" crap? Do you want us to go back to those grade school days?

That's what you are doing by adding OUS to my name in my post!

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Why jump to that conclusion? We were doing fine. Maybe if I created a word by adding those letters. When I was typing LUDICROUS in capital letters I must have bumped the keyboard and the letters jumped to the start of my post.

Frankly, modifying a poster's original post absolutely violates TOS and I could notify Herb and ask him to intercede. In other words, you've crossed the line anytime you change a poster's original post in any manner. Get that through your head...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Here is something claiming the pressure is increasing on Hillary. I will quit complaining about her if she gets a long prison sentence.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/02/why-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-cant-hide-38-documents-from-the-special-counsel/

We've already covered this one before and it's another nothing to see here. The tip-off in this link is the image of jail birds with Bill and Hillary names on their backs...

Originally Posted by James Brown

Rod, I don't get it.  Mel explained that the OUS was an accident.  It is not exactly like OUS has some derogatory meaning.  

When you or anyone else gets upset and threatens to bring Herb into the discussion, that is where I decide to stop dialoging with that person.  At least for a while.  Is that your goal here, to further stifle communication?  Jim

What, Mel doesn't proofread his own post before he posts it? Or, he doesn't read it when it does post it to make certain it's correct? When I read his so-called explanation, I took it to mean he was going to add "LUDICROUS" to my name and, instead, because he "bumped" his keyboard,(or so he says) just the "OUS" found its way in front of my name which he, somehow, didn't see or didn't bother to correct if he did read it. I'm tired of his old, tired BS, and what he did is just more of it.