Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

So lets recap.....because upto 12 people were carrying guns that they DIDNT use that is why it was an insurrection.....That about cover it? LOL

So those who have already pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy and weren't among the 12 noted above should have had you explain it to them so they'd plead not guilty instead? That about cover it? Lol! Wanna watch me play dump truck ya hillbilly hick?

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

That sounds like sexual innuendo so that would be a hard NO.....and I have something for you below.

How it sounds like that to you tells us you're even more whacked than we already know you to be...

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

I can continue to say Trump is whacked but nothing penetrates your thick skull. I  have not voted for Trump and never would. You should consider that this problem of yours will get worse as you age. Take a hike!

If that's the case, who do you continue with posts in this thread and in others that support Trump's position and actions regarding Jan 6th?

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi Rod:

Mel's position makes sense to me.  He would never vote for Trump and never did vote for Trump.  Even so, he is not convinced that the union was nearly lost on Jan 6, or that Trump was the mastermind behind the insurrection.  So he posts here.  Mel's position is not unlike my own.  I think we will both wait and see if Trump is referred for prosecution.  I hope he is, but I don't think the likes of Adam Schiff can get it done.  Jim

I'm not speaking only to the attempted insurrection of Jan 6 but also to the conspiracy to overthrow the results of the election. These acts are concurrent with one another and, like you, I hope the DOJ prosecutes Trump but a referral for prosecution from the Jan 6 committee isn't necessary for that to occur.
Today's testimony was quite powerful. Did you watch it?

"Fox anchor: Jan. 6 witnesses outlining ‘huge, stunning, clear’ lack of voter fraud evidence"
https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/3531399-fox-anchor-jan-6-witnesses-outlining-huge-stunning-clear-lack-of-voter-fraud-evidence/

I find it interesting and a bit perplexing that Jim is criticizing Adam Schiff for his role on the committee without listening to anything he had to say... 

Originally Posted by Mel Maki

Anything? People that dislike Schiff a lot get their fill of him fast. Ten minutes?

Schiff asked some questions and the GOP reps, in very compelling testimony, detailed Trump's plot to pressure them to overturn election results in their states. The GOPreps did most of the talking and everybody in attendance listened. 

Originally Posted by James Brown

Adam Schiff has no credibility because of his numerous Russian collusion and Steele dossier lies.  I suppose he still has that smoking gun somewhere?  Schiff is a rabid lying attack dog.   

Look, maybe everything Schiff has done on this particular committee is above board...  Could be I suppose.  But he has no credibility with me because of the entirety of his career.  I doubt he could ever rehabilitate himself in my view, and as you have been told, I'm a RINO.  If I seriously wanted to uncover crimes committed by Trump, Schiff is not the kind of congressman I would put on the committee.  If I wanted maximum impact on the daily talk shows, Schiff would be my guy.

Jim 

Here's politico's fact-checking on Schiff:
https://www.politifact.com/personalities/adam-schiff/
And from Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-adam-schiff-tamper-jim-jordan-jan-6-evidence-meadows-hearing-1660490
Seems like he's keeping his nose above board to me...

Pence on being informed via email on a draft-resolution from the house to remove Trump from office by invoking the 25th amendment: "yeah, excellent"
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/politics/trump-jan-6-documentary-footage-pence-25th-amendment/index.html

Talk about twisted logic: "Fox News anchor Bret Baier praised the elected Republicans, state officials and local elections workers who have testified before the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol in recent days."
“This testimony shows not only the Arizona House speaker — all of the state officials, these officials in [the Department of Justice], who again were working for President Trump, stood up saying, ‘we have an oath to the Constitution,'”
Ok, so they all stood up and took a position against Trump's fraudulent attempt and pressure campaign to overturn the results of a legitimate election. And based on the fact that they did, Trump did not overturn the election and, therefore, the Democrats on the committee are wrong and the country and Tump did not come close to overturning the results of the 2020 election! 
https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/3535023-fox-newss-bret-baier-patriots-testifying-before-jan-6-panel-stood-up-to-trumps-bid-to-overturn-election/
Ya gotta hand it to a Fox news commentator to confuse and obscuate the findings thus far of the Jan 6 committee...