Posts Made By: Jim Babcock

Libs always have a narrative about their leaders that is designed to make themselves look intelligent.

Obama is a waffler, not a Spock. The character Spock is intelligent. Obama is an idiot. Spock is a deep thinker, Obama spent so much money and taken over industries for simple political advantage. Spock does what is right for the Federation 99% of the time, Obama is out for himself and the Dems 100% of the time. Spock only speaks the truth, Obama has not a clue what the truth is. Spock speaks intelligently all of the time, Obama cannot put 2 sylobals together that makes sense without a teleprompter. Spock has a long record of positive accomplishments, Obama has a year of experience destroying the country. Obama plays 3D chess, Obama plays basketball. Spock is straight, there are questions about Obama's sexual orientation. We know for sure where Spock was born, there have been questions about where Obama was actually born.

It is really hard to see how anyone who has a brain would see these two as comparable, except that they both have funny looking ears.

What a joke this idiot president is. Because he cannot speak without a teleprompter any better than Bush, and when he does he causes scandel, this failed president now is starting to be quiet.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/01/obama-learning-the-presidential-art-of-ducking-the/

Libs say that he has become overexposed, when instead they are just afraid that his stupidity is exposed every time he speaks. This extremist lib president owns the media and it is his comrades who control what is published.

Of course Obama has been overexposed. For his level of experience and how extreme his is, he has received way too much exposure for the past 2 years. It seems that nothing in the world could happen without his propaganda ministry putting out the party's line. So while many of us hope that we never have to listen ever again to his pompus lib voice, we know that we have to put up with him at least occasionally for a couple more years.

I guess even some libs can learn. They learned that when Obama speaks people roll their eyes and his poll numbers tank more. So the new strategy is for them to just silence him.

The Chinese and everyone except for Obama's adoring followers are sick of his policies. His throwing of other people's money around may be what libs think is change they can believe in, but not even the communist can stomach his extremist policies. Like many others, they simply are giving Obama the finger, as he has earned and deserves.

So now with libs in complete control, it looks like the best way to manipulate the government all you have to do is support extremist lib policies like the destruction of the health care system.

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/04/comcast-nbc-deal-does-the-mergers-approval-rest-on-health-care/#more-41222

Considering that Obama and his jack boots come from Chicago where this is SOP, there should be no surprises. Liberalism in action.

Actually not enough said.

This is indicative of this president. Contrary to the article, he hates criticism. He is arrogant beyond compare. When a public voice speaks contrary to the emperor's extremist agenda, then they are publicly attacked by his hit men in the press and administration. Since Conyers is actually needed by the president, he simply slapped his hands in private.

Of course the most interesting part of this is that Obama's devastatingly destructive policies are not going down well anymore with even some of his most liberal friends. Unfortunately, I expect his spin machine propaganda arm to try to make this sound like he is a centrist. The public will not buy it. We know he is a loser with a failed presidency.

Obama is setting a new standard for the definition of a failed presidency. "President Obama's job approval rating has fallen to 47 percent in the latest Gallup poll, the lowest ever recorded for any president at this point in his term."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/08/obamas-percent-approval-lowest-president-point/

The only thing saving this failure at all right now is that his jack boots use their strong arm tactics and his party completely controls the government. We are now at the start of the political season where we have a chance to neuter this idiot. While he retains a small amount of support from his most extreme followers, even they are questioning this failed president and his obviously failed policies.

Did you see how the Joker president told the Republicans to stop scaring the people? 8O Obama and his leftist comrades are the ones scaring the people. From the moment they took control of Washington they used strong arm jack boot tactics to threaten and scare the public. We have been told over and over by the tyrannical lib that unless we do exactly as he says the sky is going to fall. As just a simple example, do you remember how he personally, publicly and forcefully pushed through his spending spree saying that unless everyone got on board and passed his insane policy that unemployment would hit 8%? We shot past 8% long ago. This Joker is a blight on the country. He, Pelosi, Reid and the rest of the lib leadership need to exiled from Washington ASAP. The American public are sick of this idiot and his stupid destructive lib policies. Obama, his policies and his leftist comrades should scare the crap out of any American.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/71449-obama-to-gop-stop-trying-to-frighten-the-american-people

It seems that some of the press is finally starting to do their job by asking questions about the fraud related to AGW. What is interesting is how these pillars of openness and "science" are doing everything possible, including security guards to silence inconvenient questions. How "scientific" of them.

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/11/un-security-stops-journalists-questions-about-climategate/#more-44722

It seems the last thing warmers really want is openness and truth.

Libs have never been real supporters of the military and have used every opportunity and tactic to undermine it. Unfortunately, even some Republicans have supported only clean wars where there are no losses of our troops or civilian losses. To be successful in war people die, that is what war is about. Soldiers are trained to kill. When we went into Iraq, there were literally lawyers sent along to advise soldiers on what to do so that they will not end up in court. This ridiculous and dangerous method of fighting war continues to become more entrenched everyday. If we want to fight and win wars, then we need to release the full fury of the US military, without soldiers first thinking about what a lawyer would tell them to do. We need to provide overwhelming numbers of troops to complete the job as safely (which means not wasting a fraction of a second thinking about or talking to lawyers) and quickly as possible. Obama's half ass Afghanistan escapade is a great example of how not to run a war. I find it interesting that even the leftist NPR is publishing in a lib fashion about the stupidity of this manner of warfare.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121330893

Our military when called to action simply should be there to kill the enemy and go home. The job of the UN and other similar organizations can help rebuild the war zone. That is not what soldiers are for. When our soldiers have to focus more on civilians and lawyers than on killing the enemy, then more of our brave men and women die unnecessarily. Maybe that is just part of the lib agenda. Sure some libs serve too, but like they tell us it is not out of patriotism, it is simply looking for another lib free ride to get health insurance or because evil businesses will not hire the lazy, uneducated, and worthless. Leftist scum is antiwar, but so is anyone who ever was in a war zone. The difference is that conservatives understand that we need the strongest military affordable and that when we need to go to war we need to be deliberate and decisive. We need to go in with overwhelming force, kill the enemy, destroy the infrastructure that supports the enemy, and leave. Anything less plays into the hands of limp wristed peacenik libs who have a record of spitting on our troops.

So when the warmers got caught in their fraud, did you find it interesting that within an unbelievably short period of time they definitively stated that they would need [SIZE="Large"]3 YEARS[/SIZE] to redo their science? This is questionable on several fronts. We have been told forever that they were doing peer reviewed "science". Does this not mean that those who were doing the review had access to the data and should be able to provide if the "scientists" were so sloppy with their careers work? Wasn't the science just a bunch of computer models calculating on raw data? If that is so, then why can they not quickly produce the data from the computers and the programs? Are we to just trust "scientists" who are so sloppy with their careers work? Why 3 years? It seems like it should be able to be provided much more rapidly, unless there is another agenda that requires delay. Is there a political event that is scheduled, like an election that fits into this somehow? Do they believe that by delaying producing the fraud that the public will have moved on to something else or that this gives decision makers who the warmers have in their pocket enough time to do their damage?

It just seems suspicious to someone who thought science was supposed to be repeatable when it takes 3 years to make public data and programs from a supposedly active project on a computer.