The New Q vs. the classic Takahashi FSQPosted By Doug Peterson |
Well, my initial star tests indicate that both are superb instruments.
The classic FSQ-N has a color correction similar to the TEC 140, and the new Q slighly less red, on the order of the airspaced triplets from TMB. Both samples have superb wavefront correction and exhibit pride-of-ownership right up at the top.
Subjectively, they feel about the same bulk factor (=volume x weight), despite a slight numbers disparity.
The New Q is slightly shorter in traveling mode, but about the same length in use because of the same focal length.
More to come.
The classic FSQ-N has a color correction similar to the TEC 140, and the new Q slighly less red, on the order of the airspaced triplets from TMB. Both samples have superb wavefront correction and exhibit pride-of-ownership right up at the top.
Subjectively, they feel about the same bulk factor (=volume x weight), despite a slight numbers disparity.
The New Q is slightly shorter in traveling mode, but about the same length in use because of the same focal length.
More to come.