Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Yeah, I was sorry to see JB, aka Water Boy start with the "lips on Greg's ass" thing.  

That really was such a classless remark, but hey considering the source....  

Such a gutter mouth.  

And back to the subject.  

They should be upset.  The way the Biden Admin. has been weaponizing the DOJ, is appalling.  

I seem to remember when Trump made a snide remark about Hilary, saying "Lock her up", and the left went absolutely ballistic claiming that Trump was going to weaponize the DOJ and use the DOJ for Political purposes.  

Hmm.... looks like the Biden admin. did that yesterday.  How unusual.  

Oh wait, I almost forgot again, the double standard of the left takes precedence again.  And all the RINOs cheer it.

Would you call that Hypocritical Jim on the part of RINOs and Democrats?  

Just curious.  

 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

That's got to be the funniest thing I've read.  

Gee, do you think the guy who ran the Hilary investigation, the one where they ignored completely her use of a Personal server in her home to transmit classified emails would say "Yeah, we let Hilary slide"?

This guy who "RAN the investigation" whereby she destroyed 33,000 emails that were already subpoenaed by the gov't and they did nothing at all...

This guy who "RAN the investigation" where they didn't charge her for destroying her cell phones with hammers and throwing away the SIM cards......

Yeah, this GUY has a helluva lot of credibility doesn't he?

And we're now supposed to take His word that there is no comparison?  

LOL.   Thanks again, you provide laugh out loud ignorance every single day here.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

James Comey testified numbnuts that they found 110 Classified emails on her server that she had sent.  

Comey's direct testimony:   "Our investigation found ... 110 [emails with then-classified information] that she either received or sent"

Then the corrupt Comey gave her an out, saying "No prosecutor would have charged her or tried to convict her" to which DOZENS upon DOZENS Of Former Federal Prosecutors came out immediately to call out Comey as completely full of shit.

We all watched the FBI senior level cover up for Hilary.  Because you're a clapping seal, don't include the rest of us who actually have grey matter upstairs with your gullibility. 

As I said before, thanks for the laughs.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

You are just such an absolute buffoon.  

The facts are out there and you can't refute the facts, so you turn to another country's state run media which is so totally left that it makes Soviet Russia look to be right center.

Here's directly from your article:   FBI director James Comey announced the results of a separate FBI investigation on 5 July and concluded that that while "there is evidence of potential violations" of criminal statues covering the mishandling of classified information, "our judgement is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". It referred the matter to the Justice Department, which closed the case against Mrs Clinton and her aides with no charges.

The State Department has since resumed its investigation into whether Mrs Clinton or her aides violated government policy in their handling of classified information. If it determines that they did, the punishment could include a formal letter of reprimand or loss of security clearance.


Your BBC confirms EXACTLY what I previously stated.  LOL

And also this:  whether Mrs Clinton or her aides violated government policy in their handling of classified information. If it determines that they did, the punishment could include a formal letter of reprimand or loss of security clearance

And the leftist clowns in the fake media are screaming about Trump possibly having Classified documents, but instead they'll give him a jail cell, IF they could (which they can't of course).

But Hilary Clinton would only receive a "reprimand".  Gee another confirmation of what I stated earlier that the Double Standard among the left is alive and well in Corrupt Wash. DC

Their BS appeals to the most ignorant among us, which is why you suck it up and ask for more.  

As Bugs Bunny says "What a maroon"!  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Just so interesting to watch you simply deny and lie.  So that article didn't confirm ANYTHING I said, as you put ANYTHING in Big Bold letters above?

Let me reiterate for emphasis, it didn't confirm ANYTHING I said?  I'll just prove it here in about 1 minute.

Let's just take the one sentence that I highlighted in your article from your article:

Your Article stated:   "FBI director James Comey announced the results of a separate FBI investigation on 5 July and concluded that that while "there is evidence of potential violations" of criminal statues covering the mishandling of classified information, "our judgement is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". It referred the matter to the Justice Department, which closed the case against Mrs Clinton and her aides with no charges".

Now let's examine what I stated in my post #65 in this thread.

Here are my words verbatim:  "Then the corrupt Comey gave her an out, saying 'No prosecutor would have charged her or tried to convict her' to which DOZENS upon DOZENS Of Former Federal Prosecutors came out immediately to call out Comey as completely full of shit".

You know something, proving you out to be either of these 2 things,

A: Wrong,
B: A completely full of shit Liar..

Is becoming easier than shooting fish in a barrel.  

Any other BS that you spout out of your piehole, which you need corrected as I just did above, then you can have your people contact my people Ok?  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

So since I just established that your response was totally full of shit, whereby you claimed this:   "The BBC article doesn't confirm ANYTHING you've stated", and I showed (using your article) that the BBC article verified precisely what I said,

you're now going to jump to whether or not those prosecutors who DID say they could have easily prosecuted her, and that they would have prosecuted, were retired??

This is your best response?  So when you're proven wrong, your response is now "well, those guys are retired".  

Thanks for the laughs.  You're now becoming my daily dose of humor.  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Just more of the same lol

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Right.  Here's the rub for you.  And this has been ruled upon by Federal Judges in the past.

Trump has plenary power to declassify documents.  He doesn't need the approval of Congress.  He doesn't need the approval of the courts, and he doesn't need the approval of the leftist media or the Dep't of Justice to do so.

Hilary Clinton was Sec'y of State and didn't have the power to declassify the Top Secret documents that were on the illegal server, the one she had put at her private residence.

The top secret emails that were on her server were there with the ability to be hacked by our enemies at any time.

The Documents seized at Trump's residence were in boxes not on an illegal server like Hilary Clinton had. 

Donald Trump and his lawyers had a meeting with the Feds just 6 weeks prior to the raid on his Home. 

The Feds came to look at his storage areas and they told him to put another lock on one room where they said they had concerns about it.

Trump and his lawyers complied.

Donald Trump didn't burn evidence as Hilary Clinton did when she destroyed the evidence of the 33,000 emails that the DOJ had already subpoenaed and that she destroyed after the DOJ issued that subpoenaed.

And if you are agree with Comey when he didn't charge Hilary Clinton because he said that there needed to be "intent" by Hilary Clinton to commit a crime then you of course agree that Trump committed no crime whatsoever because there was no "intent" by Trump to commit a crime.

So just going by those facts, this whole thing was and is absurd and nothing here to see.

And therefore out of simple consistency in the 2 situations, I can then make the learned assessment that you agree, there Is nothing there.  

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

That would be the retard wing of the GOP.

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

The problem is the rhetoric from Rubio, DeSantis and others in the GOP is just as bad and it's stirring up the wingnuts in much the same manner as Hawley's fist pump on Jan 6th among other similar GOP actions on that day. The media is already reporting intercepted statements from wingnut groups of "crossing the rubicon" which is their code for civil war...