Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

When you're able to create the narrative and ask leading questions without challenge or any defense permitted, as the Narrator you can its pretty damned easy to make anything look however you like it to look.

Simple example is when Liz Cheney posted about Donald Trump and put up all of his words, except the sentence "I know many of you are going to March over to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard", it is simple to understand how that is lying by omission and creating the narrative she wants the world to see.

It is what has been done all through this sham.  

Ever heard the phrase that a Grand Jury would indict a ham sandwich??

I guess not, but when you don't have much upstairs, you don't get it.  

Just as the gal got up in front of the Jan 6 committee to fabricate a story that the Secret Service Agents who were there, said did not happen.

They said that she just made it all up, but yet they haven't testified have they now?  And guess what?  They never will.  

And just for the record, who exactly are these Trump loyalists that are testifying?  LOL  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

And of course that's a complete lie.  Jonathan Karl had the weasel Kinzinger on This Week with Stephanopoulis and he said to Kinzinger flat out "Are they not cooperating" to which weasel Kinzinger said "You'll have to ask them", and Karl replied "because they've put out statements saying they would be willing to testify Under Oath. Are they not"? and the weasel's response was "well I'll tell you this much, the committee is ready to throw the doors wide open to them". 

Now the fact is that Liz Cheney and the committee haven't asked them and they have made NO time available for them to testify.

Both Cheney and Kinzinger are their usual lying sacks of shit.

Both of those 2 are such f'in sleaze buckets that they won't answer the question directly, they dance and weave and parse words and facts.

BTW, did you hear that Cheney got literally stomped in her relection bid against the Primary Repub. Challenger? 

She was squashed like the cockroach that she is.  

With 75% of the vote in, Cheney got less than half of the number of votes that Hageman got.  It was a slaughter and that was with all the Dems changing parties to vote for Cheney.  If they hadn't tried their sleazy trick, she would have likely got about 20%.

She is toast and she now knows that Wyoming voters hate her guts. 

Bye, bye Lizzie.  See you on MSNBC.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Ha, ha, ha!!  
Let's examine your statements above:  
YOU stated:  
1. "your nonsense about the secret service agents refusing to testify under oath"

Hmm....My nonsense?  Hmm... YOU put forth the idea that they refused to testify under oath 
I then immediately put up evidence of Adam Kinzinger speaking to John Karl of ABCs Sunday Show, where Karl flat out verified TO Kinzinger that the FBI agents Did agree to testify under oath, and Kinzinger had no response other than to say "they have an open invitation". 
He didn't say WHEN they were going to testify, because the Jan 6 committee never put forth a slot of time for either of the agents to come and testify.  The agents were never offered up the chance to testify.

Then YOU stated:
2.  "the Republican primary turnout in the reddest state in the country was off by 80-90,000 no-shows"

Can I offer you a bit of simple advice?  When you're as dumb as you've proven to be in the past regarding 1st grade math and numbers in general, it is best to not dig yourself into a deeper hole.
YOU gave the numbers that there are 200,000 Republican voters registered in the state of Wy.  Those were the numbers that YOU gave.  
So then, last night 170,000 Republican voters turned out in the REPUB primary to vote. This was the breakdown:  
113,050 voted for Hageman
49,300 voted for Cheney. 
8000+ others voted for the 4 other Repub candidate.  

Do the math in your head moron.  That adds up to 170,000 or so, out of 200K (the number YOU provided as Registered Repubs).  
So where do you come up with your moronic assertion that there were 80,000 to 90,000 NO shows?

The difference there is 30,000.  Realizing that you're among the lower if not lowest IQ citizens in this country, even you can't be this stupid..... Or can you? 
Let's revisit what YOU said earlier:   "Wyoming has over 200,000 registered Republican voters compared to around 43000 Democrats". 
So then, if there are a total of 243,000 registered Repubs AND Democrats in the state and it is proven that 170,000 voters voted in the Primary, out of 243,000 voters total (not including Reg. Ind.) then where do you come up with your moronic idiocy that 90,000 REPUB voters were NO shows?  
200,000 Repubs - 170,000 voting Repubs = 30,000..

So explain, where are the MISSING 90,000 Repubs?  85% voted in the Primary.  
I have to just say that when you're a mathematically illiterate Moron, its best to keep your pie hole shut rather than exposing to the entire world what a complete idiot you truly are.  

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I also sometimes think he's a bot of some kind that's gone haywire, created by the powers that be here on AM to antagonize the participants of this forum.

Why else wouldn't he post a picture? He doesn't have a phone? 

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

Is it just me, or do others find it hysterical that the entire contents of townhall articles are contained in the URL's to the stories?

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

But of course, his sycophants here will try their best to come to his defense of this:

https://twitter.com/ksorbs/status/1560238181273915392?cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=email


Oh.... Hmm.... So the Best defense is to get the virus yourself and then you don't need a vaccine??  Really Dr. Fauci?

I seem to recall the Fauci bootlickers here assure us that we were all washed up because we stated that contracting the virus was BETTER than a Vaccine.

The Fauci Bootlickers told us that he IS Science, and that if we disagreed with his recent statements about which is better, natural immunity or a vaccine.....

Suffice to say, that if we claimed that Natural Immunity was better than a vaccine, we were "Science Deniers".

I guess Fauci used to be a "Science Denier".  

Wow, that's interesting!  

P.S. Oh how the Science changes when one is a political hack who is carrying the Democrat's water, because one is really a Democrat politician Masquerading as Fauci, aka 'The Science'. 

Fauci   'The Science' :  

"The BEST vaccination is to get infected yourself.  Its the most potent vaccination is getting infected (the virus)  yourself"

"The BEST vaccination is to get infected yourself.  Its the most potent vaccination is getting infected (the virus)  yourself"

"The BEST vaccination is to get infected yourself.  Its the most potent vaccination is getting infected (the virus)  yourself"


I had to reprint that 3 times, because Joe Biden does that for effect.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Not me, I always knew that you were a gullible DSOB.  

https://www.nbc12.com/2022/06/22/natural-immunity-offers-greater-covid-protection-than-vaccines-study-finds/

A study published this month in the New England Journal of Medicine shared findings that supported natural immunity providing greater protection from COVID infection than multiple vaccinations.


https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946

Among persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 (regardless of whether they had received any dose of vaccine or whether they had received one dose before or after infection), protection against reinfection decreased as the time increased since the last immunity-conferring event; however, this protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons. A single dose of vaccine after infection reinforced protection against reinfection.