Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Resident communist and Russian Dossier conspiracy peddler, 

  I know this concept is too big for your simpleton head to figure out or understand, but there can be ballot harvesting and election fraud that doesn't result in someone losing an election because of it, but that doesn't mean that it didn't happen.  

  There is a good amount of evidence that ballots were dropped off in ballot collection boxes by the hundreds in many areas, as those occurrences are on video of single people doing that very thing.

  I know that nobody here on the right claimed that it was enough to overcome the amount that Donald Trump lost by, yet I do recall that You personally, our resident communist and dossier conspiracy peddler did come on and say that the Dossier was real and not made up by the Russian operative hired by Christopher Steele who was paid by Hillary Clinton to develop it and the lies that were in it.

  I do remember you doing that.  Tell me, do you still buy the BS Steele Dossier as being factual as you've put forth all along since day 1?  I mean if that isn't at this point peddling a conspiracy theory I don't know what is.  

  Now then do you accept Robert Mueller's assertion that there was/is no evidence to support the conspiracy theory that was peddled by You for over 3 years that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin, to win the general election for President in 2016?  Are you still supporting that conspiracy theory that You peddled here for all that time or do you accept Robert Mueller's investigation findings?  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Resident communist,

   No, nothing has been debunked.

Because your leftist news outlets make that assertion, it means nothing. 

There are videos out there that show people in the middle of the night, 2am, 3am, etc... dropping off garbage bags fuil of votes into drop boxes in various areas of the nation.  

  This is what your links say about that fact:   "But that’s based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box, according to experts".

Let me just address some of the accusations above that your links assert:  

First, let's talk about the claim above that "anonymous accounts" can't be trusted, as if that is some sort of evidence of "debunking".  

Virtually every person in articles that the Washington Post, NY Times, LA Times, Boston Globe, USA Today, uses and cites as EVIDENCE is referred to in their articles of "Fact" as "anonymous sources".   

That is how all of the above "News Outlets" report on stories, using anonymous sources.  

But now YOU are going to say that citing anonymous sources are not credible?   LOL!  

No, if your newspapers above are going to cry foul because the sources that show ballot box stuffing are "anonymous" and can't be trusted, then every single article that these newspapers print are lies and not credible.  IF they are going to cite anonymous sources in every article they pen, then they don't get the luxury of calling out others for their 'anonymous' sources.  

Next, their claim is that the people in the videos shown dropping off garbage bags full of ballots to drop boxes in the middle of the night, and using cellphone GPS as the indicator of their location, is faulty.

Really?  GPS from cellphones is "faulty" and can't be trusted?

Well you might want to inform the FBI itself of that statement, because the FBI Itself USES GPS Cellphone data in their investigations and Has used that same cellphone GPS data in trials of criminals to prove their locations when committing crimes.

Well then, if it good enough evidence for the FBI to take and use in court then I think that is good enough evidence to show that these people were at these locations in the middle of the night, regardless of what your leftist news outlets and fact checkers say.

Do you have anything else that I can destroy with facts and contrary evidence or is that enough of a beatdown for one afternoon?   

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

I guess the bottom line is if the house republicans care about security of classified documents on both Hunter's laptop, as we saw last week in the committee hearings, or Hillary's email servers they should care about this. If they don't they are all hypocrites and partisan hacks.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-aide-laptop-copies-of-classified-docs-report-says-2023-2

"Lawyers for former President Donald Trump discovered more classified materials in January and gave them to federal investigators, multiple reports say.

Among the materials turned in were papers with classified markings, an empty folder with classified markings, and the laptop of one of Trump's aides, multiple news outlets reported.

The classified documents were discovered at Mar-a-Lago, but not in the area where Trump stored the batch of materials seized during the August search of his home by FBI agents, ABC News reported.

Sources told ABC News that James Trusty, Trump's attorney, told federal investigators that classified materials had been electronically copied onto the laptop of the aide. The aide apparently did not know that they had scanned classified materials onto their laptop, sources told CNN."

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

LOL....pot, kettle, black much Rod?

Originally Posted by David Cotterell

It is more clear every day that every government official above the level of the caretaking staff has now, or has had in the past, classified documents on their laptop, in their iPhones, under the kitchen sink and buried in the backyard.  Surely this is the most bipartisan issue in American history. 

Dave

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

And, of course, neither Hunter or Hillary were ever the president at any time


Which of course makes what either of them did so far worse that it is incalculable

They didn't have the Constitution behind them and they had NO business removing classified docs for any reason while Trump as the Pres, possessed the Consitutional power to declassify any documents he wanted to at any time.

I can just imagine how utterly irate the left would have been, to the point of apoplectic had Don Jr. or any other Trump been caught red handed with Classified docs in their possession, yet you are just that stupid that you will defend Hunter, a drug addled loser of all time having classified docs in his possession.

I can't make up this story and just how damned stupid you are for trying to defend it.  LOL!  

Thanks for making my job easy here.  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Oops....Rich beat me to it. So how about that Huma Abedeen question he asked you? You answer that and I will answer you. Seem fair? LOL

Originally Posted by James Lacey

The problem seems to be especially bad with the executive branch. At least, that's where most of the recent revelations are coming from. Maybe it isn't good in the other components of the government as well.

Another thing that should be painfully clear is that no high-level current or former government executive will be charged for the simple mishandling of classified documents. I mean, if Trump is not going to be charged, no one will ever be charged. His abuse is egregiously wrong compared to the other cases we know about, including Hillary's. I remember the popular refrain against Hillary: "If it were anyone else, they would be in jail already!" Well, that sentiment applies to Trump to a very high degree. We are far from the ideal that "no one is above the law."

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Right....you were so loud and adamant about Huma and Hillary's transgressions back in the day as well right? LOL