Hi Joseph,
If not for your exuberance for an image that is so obliviously over processed I would normally not comment on an image like this.
With no disrespect meant for you or the person who took the image this IMO is one of the most over processed images of Mars I have seen in a long time, I think most people that frequent here know that I very seldom say anything negitive about an image and I at first hesitated to say anything about this image.
Thanks,
Wes Higgins
joseph cannavo said:
Hi all.
As a visual observer who greatly enjoys watching the incredible strides you guys are making, I ask for reactions to the following image:
http://www.buytelescopes.com/gallery/view_photo.asp?pid=7570
It seems that the theoretical resolution limit is being significantly exceeded.
As someone who knows nothing about CCD imaging, I pose what is perhaps a silly question:
Is it possible for the expectations of the imager (based on what they know about the actual details of the target) to somehow be inadvertantly "processed" into the final image.
Joe
Please note, I am in no way challenging integrity here. My question only addresses methodology.