Originally Posted by James Brown
I'm curious. You read the Vox article and you did not get the overall impression that the author believes Bragg will "probably not" win felony convictions... I think "probably not win felony convictions" is a very fair summary of the article, starting with the title. One does not use the word "dubious" without tipping their hand as to the author's underlying opinion. Did anyone else read the article and form an opinion? I get it that this is really pedantic stuff.
As I had already stated in my prior post, I think the author of the Vox article is attempting to present all sides of it in an effort to inform the read of the legal ramifications of the case so no I don't think the author believes Bragg "will probably not" win the case.
Nor do I think our justice system lays in ashes. I think it's absurd to think that it does based upon a case that hasn't come to trial. Some people in the forum and in the GOP don't like it, have been biased against it before the indictments, don't like what they see in the indictments, and fortify each others belief system in their own echo chamber. Bragg believes he has a case. A grand jury believes he has a case. Let's hear what a trial jury has to say without the legal gymnastics in the form of the appeals due to supposed conflicts in state vs federal law that have been described in the Vox article occur that may potentially negate a guilty verdict at trial. THAT would indicate our system lies in ashes since the judicial system would be manipulated in in order to make it happen...