Clarence & GinnyPosted By Rod Kaufman |
No RD, its based upon various retired judges interviewed who have stated Clarence's vacation revelations far exceed the norms for reporting procedures. What Clarence has done is unprecedented in the courts:Originally Posted by Richard Davis
DS in Cal wrote:
Up till now, nothing of the magnitude of what Thomas did occurred with any other member of the court at anytime
The simple fact is that you have not one iota of knowledge as to what others on the court have done unless you know everything about their life and have seen every tax return they have provided while they are/were on the court.
So then what you stated above is beyond conjecture and clairvoyance.
Not only that, you are too clueless to even realize just how moronic the comment you made above is to anyone with a reasoning brain.
Then you followed up the 1st moronic comment you made with this next moronic comment:
It's a safe bet that he didn't describe in any detail the degree of the value of the various vacations that he failed to disclose to anyone.
Once again, you make a 2nd comment that is nothing more than guessing on your part.
Is there any other stupid conjecture/remarks that you want to continue embarrassing yourself by making here?
If so, feel free, because we know you are certainly capable of more moronic stupidity.
"In the past, lodging and food provided on someone’s property has been exempted from disclosure requirements, but transportation, which Thomas accepted, has not been. Per ProPublica, the “extent and frequency” of gifts that Thomas received from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow — which included flights on private jets and trips on luxury yachts — have “no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court.”
"Thomas’s lack of disclosure about these trips is a clear violation of government ethics law, legal experts told Vox. Federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, are required to disclose such gifts under the Ethics in Government Act, which establishes rules for federal officials regarding what’s acceptable. As detailed by the law, transportation gifts, like those that Thomas accepted, need to be divulged."
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/4/6/23672921/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-propublica-luxury-trips-harlan-crow